[jira] [Created] (CALCITE-3274) Add FilterOnProjectToFilterUnifyRule for materialization matching

jin xing created CALCITE-3274: - Summary: Add FilterOnProjectToFilterUnifyRule for materialization matching Key: CALCITE-3274 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3274 Project: Calcite

[jira] [Created] (CALCITE-3273) Materialization matching rules that consider compensating MutableProject

jin xing created CALCITE-3273: - Summary: Materialization matching rules that consider compensating MutableProject Key: CALCITE-3273 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3273 Project:

Re: TVF windowing and EMIT syntax support in Calcite

Thanks Danny. I have filed a sub-task under it: CALCITE-3272. Can you grant me contributor permission so I can assign it to myself? -Rui On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 8:24 PM Danny Chan wrote: > Thanks for bring up this topic, Rui Wang ~ > > I have fired an Umbrella issue [1] about this topic

[jira] [Created] (CALCITE-3272) TUMBLE Table Value Function

Rui Wang created CALCITE-3272: - Summary: TUMBLE Table Value Function Key: CALCITE-3272 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3272 Project: Calcite Issue Type: Sub-task

Re: TVF windowing and EMIT syntax support in Calcite

Thanks for bring up this topic, Rui Wang ~ I have fired an Umbrella issue [1] about this topic where we can create sub-tasks. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3271 Best, Danny Chan 在 2019年8月20日 +0800 AM9:59，Rui Wang ，写道： > Hi Calcite community, > > I have seen [1] is

[jira] [Created] (CALCITE-3271) TVF windowing and EMIT syntax support in Calcite

Danny Chan created CALCITE-3271: --- Summary: TVF windowing and EMIT syntax support in Calcite Key: CALCITE-3271 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3271 Project: Calcite Issue

Calcite-Master - Build # 1307 - Still Failing

The Apache Jenkins build system has built Calcite-Master (build #1307) Status: Still Failing Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Calcite-Master/1307/ to view the results.

Calcite-Master - Build # 1306 - Still Failing

The Apache Jenkins build system has built Calcite-Master (build #1306) Status: Still Failing Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Calcite-Master/1306/ to view the results.

Re: Match Converter Rule based on Child Nodes

If you just want to control whether the rule gets applied, you can override RelOptRule#matches which canreturns a boolean indicating whether the rule should be applied. -- Michael Mior mm...@apache.org Le ven. 9 août 2019 à 08:48, rahul patwari a écrit : > > Hi, > > We want to create a

Re: PLC4X Request Optimization

Hi Stamatis, thanks for your response. I think my brain just needs a bit more time to get really deep into those advanced planning topics (its sometimes slow on adopting...). But I will look through it. We have a meetup this week and will discuss the matter and how to setup everything to enable

Re: Github Actions

That's great news, thanks a lot Francis! The option of using actions for CI is really appealing especially if you say that is fast. I am trying to enable slow tests in Travis but I don't think it is going to happen since they are really slow. I will try to see what can be done using actions.

Re: PLC4X Request Optimization

Hi Julian F, I admit that I didn't really get your example but talking about 'batch request optimization' and 'collapsing "overlapping" but not equal requests' I get the impression that the problem is optimizing sets of queries which may have common sub-expressions; the problem is usually

[jira] [Created] (CALCITE-3270) Close resources

Fokko Driesprong created CALCITE-3270: - Summary: Close resources Key: CALCITE-3270 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3270 Project: Calcite Issue Type: Task

Re: Github Actions

Sounds great! I've been wanting to play around with GitHub Actions more myself and this sounds encouraging. -- Michael Mior mm...@apache.org Le lun. 19 août 2019 à 18:15, Francis Chuang a écrit : > > Hey everyone, > > Previously I mentioned that I was working on automated website builds > for

Re: PLC4X Request Optimization

Hi Julian, thanks for the reply. I have to think about that, I think. But as I understand the Spool Operator this is to factor out multiple calculations of the same issue. In our Situation we aim more on collapsing "overlapping" but not equal requests. Consider 8 bits which form physically a

Calcite-Master - Build # 1305 - Still Failing

The Apache Jenkins build system has built Calcite-Master (build #1305) Status: Still Failing Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Calcite-Master/1305/ to view the results.