Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Mihai Budiu

Congratulations, Mihai! On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 08:08 Ran Tao wrote: > Congratulations, Mihai ! > and thanks for the review in the issue and PR ! > > Best Regards, > Ran Tao > > Stamatis Zampetakis 于2023年10月26日周四 16:57写道： > > > Apache Calcite's Project Management Committee (PMC) has invited

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Alex Plehanov

Welcome, Alex! On Tue, Jan 10, 2023, 11:01 Stamatis Zampetakis wrote: > Welcome Alex! Looking forward to working with you. > > Best, > Stamatis > > On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 2:48 AM Chunwei Lei > wrote: > > > Welcome, Alex! > > > > > > Best, > > Chunwei > > > > > > On Sun, Jan 8, 2023 at 3:59 PM

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Dmitry Sysolyatin

Congratulations! On Tue, Nov 8, 2022, 16:08 Francis Chuang wrote: > Congratulations, Dmitry! > > Francis > > On 9/11/2022 6:13 am, Julian Hyde wrote: > > Congratulations, Dmitry! Thanks for the great work you’ve already done > for the project. > > > > Julian > > > > > >> On Nov 8, 2022, at

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Andrei Sereda joins Calcite PMC

Hi All, Thanks for your kind words. I'm looking forward to our continued collaboration, expanding the community and making Calcite a better framework. Regards, Andrei. On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 8:03 AM Alessandro Solimando wrote: > > Congratulations Andrei and thanks again for driving the

Re: Calcite Release 1.31 started

-- C > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Aug 3, 2022, at 8:30 PM, Benchao Li wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Andrei for being the RM for 1.31.0 > > > > > > >

Re: Calcite Release 1.31 started

1.31 has been released. You can resume dev work on the main branch. Thanks for your patience. On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 2:52 AM Andrei Sereda wrote: > Hello, > > I'm starting the Calcite 1.31 release. Main branch will be frozen until > completion. > > Please avoid committin

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Calcite 1.31.0 (release candidate 3)

gt; > > > >> - checked signature and checksum: OK > > > >> - build and test from source: OK > > > >> - diff sources with release tag: OK > > > >> - checked NOTICE file and licenses: OK > > > >> - checked files in repo staging: O

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Calcite 1.31.0 (release candidate 3)

Thanks to everyone who has tested the release candidate and given their comments and votes. The tally is as follows. 5 binding +1s: Ruben Q L Julian Hyde Francis Chuang Stamatis Zempetakis Chunwei Lei 3 non-binding +1s: Andrei Sereda Enrico Olivelli Benchao Li No 0s or -1s. Therefore, I am

Re: [CANCELLED] Release Apache Calcite 1.31.0 (release candidate 1)

I had to skip RC2 because of some changes to history.md (while the rc2 tag was already created on gitbox). The vote for RC3 has been sent. On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 1:14 PM Andrei Sereda wrote: > Hello, > > Due to checksum mismatches, voting for RC1 is cancelled. > > I will se

[VOTE] Release Apache Calcite 1.31.0 (release candidate 3)

Hi all, I have created a build for Apache Calcite 1.31.0, release candidate 3. Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release. You can read the release notes here: https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/calcite-1.31.0-rc3/site/_docs/history.md The commit to be voted upon:

[CANCELLED] Release Apache Calcite 1.31.0 (release candidate 1)

Hello, Due to checksum mismatches, voting for RC1 is cancelled. I will send another vote for RC2 shortly. Regards, Andrei.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Calcite 1.31.0 (release candidate 1)

a0b19b75e856e9a81e31c0252e8f6afed79c40ec88f71ecd708d90a63a1e5815a95dedfab56ebfa7e81851b3153833736447100a8f47 > > apache-calcite-1.31.0-src.tar.gz > > > > -1 (binding) > > > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 6:40 PM Andrei Sereda wrote: > > > > > Hi all, &g

[CANCELLED] Release Apache Calcite 1.31.0 (release candidate 0)

Hello, Due to some issues detected with RC0 we have decided to prepare a new candidate RC1. The voting thread for RC0 is therefore closed. Please follow communications on RC1 thread. Regards, Andrei.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Calcite 1.31.0 (release candidate 0)

I have started a separate thread for RC1. Among fixes that have been discussed previously, it also includes new Avatica version 1.22: CALCITE-5221 On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 6:33 PM Andrei Sereda wrote: > Hello, > > Thanks for the detailed feedback. > > Regarding differences betw

[VOTE] Release Apache Calcite 1.31.0 (release candidate 1)

Hi all, I have created a build for Apache Calcite 1.31.0, release candidate 1. Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release. You can read the release notes here: https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/calcite-1.31.0-rc1/site/_docs/history.md The commit to be voted upon:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Calcite 1.31.0 (release candidate 0)

s wrote "Old behavior: > The Project operator is transformed into Calc. New behavior: The > Project operator is not transformed and the rule becomes NOOP.") > > 3. Andrei, you should have added yourself ("Andrei Sereda (release > manager)") to the list of contri

[VOTE] Release Apache Calcite 1.31.0 (release candidate 0)

Hi all, I have created a build for Apache Calcite 1.31.0, release candidate 0. Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release. You can read the release notes here: https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/calcite-1.31.0-rc0/site/_docs/history.md The commit to be voted upon:

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.31.0

of the pushRepositoryProvider override ? On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 10:47 PM Andrei Sereda wrote: > Thanks, Julian. I did include GITBOX in the prepare vote command. > > $ gradle prepareVote -Prc=0 -Pasf -Pasf.git.pushRepositoryProvider=GITBOX > > > > On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 1:31

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.31.0

E-4856 ? > > On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 7:36 AM Andrei Sereda wrote: > > > > Quick update. > > > > I've addressed all comments in the release notes PR. > > > > While tagging RC0, I've run into small issue with apache gitbox > > authorization (see below) bu

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.31.0

.GitPushTask$pushTag$1.invoke(GitPushTask.kt:54) On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 1:14 AM Andrei Sereda wrote: > Hi Julian, > > I think it is a great idea. > > Please take a look at proposed release notes: > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2858 > > Thanks, > Andrei. >

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.31.0

> release notes. People can then review the release notes, comment on that > PR, and add their own release notes. As RM you would not submit the PR, but > instead manually rebase onto the final RC. > > Julian > > > > On Jul 19, 2022, at 6:44 PM, Andrei Sereda wrote: >

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.31.0

Hello, Anything specific you'd like to be added to the release notes of 1.31 ? If so, please provide a short summary as well as JIRA id. Andrei. On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 10:07 PM Andrei Sereda wrote: > Hi Julian, > > > > Andrei, Are there any remaining blockers for 1.31

Calcite Release 1.31 started

Hello, I'm starting the Calcite 1.31 release. Main branch will be frozen until completion. Please avoid committing anything to main until further notice. Andrei.

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.31.0

> > to 1.32，I think pr-2838 <https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2838> > for > > CALCITE-5045 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5045> > should be > > merged before 1.31, because it's simple and Yingyu Wang encountered this > > problem also. > &

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.31.0

t;> Dmitry Sysolyatin 于2022年6月14日周二 17:18写道： > >>> > >>>> Hi! > >>>> It would be good to merge: > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5134 > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5127 >

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.31.0

t responded). > > Julian > > > > On Jun 4, 2022, at 2:17 PM, Andrei Sereda wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I have created a JIRA filter > > < > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.31.0%20A

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.31.0

t; Julian > > >> > > >> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/g8tjg0qxbot8b69rgv3poo618o3xvob1 > > >> > > >> > > >>> On May 26, 2022, at 12:58 AM, xiong duan > wrote: > > >>> > > >>> +1 for mid-June for the first RC. >

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.31.0

; On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 4:26 PM Ruben Q L wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > It has been more than two months since our last release [1], and I think > we > > should make an effort to continue keeping the rhythm of one release every > > two months approximately. > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.30.0

t; > > > > > Thanks for driving this Ruben! > > > > > > > > > > > > Another alternative if Andrei is unavailable at the moment would > be > > > to > > > > > see > > > > > > if they can switch places with Liya. Would this b

Re: Mailing list's policy on job postings?

Hello, This was discussed here: https://lists.apache.org/thread/31o50vg2k8oolqj19m7rj6cfto56owq5 Thanks, Andrei On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 6:17 PM Ian Bertolacci wrote: > > Howdy, > What is this mailing list’s policy regarding job postings? > > Thanks! > -Ian J. Bertolacci >

Re: [DISCUSS] Upgrading Elasticsearch in Calcite from 7.0.1 to 7.15

+1 Also take a look at vendor's official support schedule: https://www.elastic.co/support/eol I think it is safe to upgrade ES rest client to currently supported version. On Mon, Nov 22, 2021, 19:00 Julian Hyde wrote: > +1 > > Sounds like a good idea. > > > On Nov 22, 2021, at 6:40 AM,

Job postings on the dev list ?

Hello, I wanted to ask what members of this list think about receiving / posting job opportunities (related to query optimisation / database engine) to calcite-dev ? Is it an appropriate usage of the dev@ list ? Should one use a different channel ? Thanks, Andrei.

Re: (CALCITE-4292) Wrong results in ElasticSearch when query contains NOT EQUAL

I also agree that we should preserve SQL semantics, regardless of the adapter. For more details see a good article about Three Valued Logic . On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 11:32 AM Julian Hyde wrote: > I support Stamatis’ position. Our SQL adapter

Re: [CALCITE-4232]-Elasticsearch IN Query is not supported

Hi Arpit, I'm also happy to take a look at your PR since I'm more or less familiar with that part of the codebase. Thanks, Andrei On Wed, Sep 22, 2021, 06:17 Stamatis Zampetakis wrote: > Hi Arpit, > > Given that it has been a long time since the last review there are quite a > few things

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Managers

I volunteered for 1.30 but happy to release a different version. On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 6:53 PM Haisheng Yuan wrote: > Thanks, Rui. > > Now we have release managers: > Rui Wang for 1.29.0 > Liya Fan for 1.30.0 > > Thanks, > Haisheng Yuan > > On 2021/06/04 22:05:34, Rui Wang wrote: > > In

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Managers

I'm happy to help with 1.30 On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 1:27 PM Julian Hyde wrote: > Yes, I'll be release manager for 1.28. > > I think I promised to be a release manager a while ago. I forget which > release. Sorry about that. > > On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 1:09 AM Stamatis Zampetakis > wrote: > > > >

Re: How to test new datasource without "in memory/mock" implementation

I agree with Julian. Not everybody has the option to run docker locally. Perhaps execute tests against embedded (or fake) instance as well as a real one (docker or externally managed) ? Like it is done in MongoDatabasePolicy.java [1] Currently tests for Elasticsearch, Geode and Mongo are all run

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.26.0 (release candidate 0)

+1 (non-binding). - build locally: ok - check git hash: ok - check sha512 for artifacts: ok - check GPG signature: ok openjdk version "1.8.0_212" Note that I'm getting 404 for your public GPG key located here: https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/rubenql.asc So I've used Calcite KEYS

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.25.0 (release candidate 0)

5.0 as released? > > Francis > > On 23/08/2020 8:29 am, Andrei Sereda wrote: > > There are two things to be done by PMCs (unfortunately I can't due to > > restricted access): > > > > 1. Add release date 2020-08-22 for 1.25 to Apache Report Helper [1] > > 2. Mark vers

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.25.0 (release candidate 0)

[1] https://reporter.apache.org/addrelease.html?calcite [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/CALCITE/versions/12348564 On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 3:49 PM Michael Mior wrote: > Thanks Andrei! > > -- > Michael Mior > mm...@apache.org > > Le sam. 22 août 2020 à 15:08, A

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.25.0 (release candidate 0)

INFRA-20681 was resolved. I have published the artifacts to SVN dist area. Will update static site and send an announcement shortly. On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 5:37 PM Andrei Sereda wrote: > Hello, > > I'm still waiting for INFRA-20681 [1] to be resolved to publish 1.25.0 > arti

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.25.0 (release candidate 0)

Hello, I'm still waiting for INFRA-20681 [1] to be resolved to publish 1.25.0 artifacts to SVN. If some of you know different channels to speed up the resolution please let me know. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-20681 On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 12:58 PM Andrei Sereda wrote

Re: master locked during 1.25.0 release

397e06 > < > https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/aadb605decd6bb6a853e23fac4b0f479b2397e06 > >. > > Julian > > > > On Aug 7, 2020, at 7:03 PM, Andrei Sereda wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > Please avoid committing anything to master while 1.25

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.25.0 (release candidate 0)

> > (Usually we push branch-x.x to master and re-open commits as soon as > the release vote passes. Amendments to release notes, if necessary, > can happen later.) > > Julian > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 11:13 AM Andrei Sereda wrote: > > > > Thanks to everyon

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.25.0 (release candidate 0)

tagingRepositories/nexus.txt and send me the content in > your local repo? > > Thanks, > Haisheng > > On 2020/08/13 14:47:05, Andrei Sereda wrote: > > It can also be configured per project. > > > > > Do you know if SVN access can be configured per project ?

[DISCUSS] Open SVN dist access to committers

Hello, For the last two releases ([1] and [2]) committers were not able to finalize the release due to SVN restrictions. One of the PMC members had to step in order to distribute the artifacts. By default, only PMCs are allowed to make changes to dist

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.25.0 (release candidate 0)

It can also be configured per project. > Do you know if SVN access can be configured per project ? > Yes it can, if the PMC agrees to it, the dist area can be opened up to all project committers - a few PMCs have done this. On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 10:43 AM Andrei Sereda wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.25.0 (release candidate 0)

Inquired with INFRA-20681 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-20681> seems like only PMCs can commit to dist SVN: > Are committers (which are not PMCs) allowed to commit to SVN dist repo ? > ..., nope, by default its PMC members only On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 9:27 AM A

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.25.0 (release candidate 0)

his is just the way ASF's infra is > > set up, but it's worth a look. > > > > Francis > > > > [1] > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rdb11cf78eaeecfefd68ce224cd2e6fd1e9f2ad964169d80f5d9cb82a%40%3Cdev.calcite.apache.org%3E > > > > On 13/0

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.25.0 (release candidate 0)

wrong and you were not able to push it through. > > Best, > Stamatis > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 1:24 AM Andrei Sereda wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > Can somebody from PMC pls upload my public GPG key to KEYS > > <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.25.0 (release candidate 0)

Hello, Can somebody from PMC pls upload my public GPG key to KEYS <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/calcite/KEYS> ? I don't have permissions for that svn repo. I've sent an email to priv...@calcite.apache.org. Thanks, Andrei. On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 1:17 PM Andrei Sereda

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.25.0 (release candidate 0)

* Andrei Sereda No 0s or -1s. Therefore I am delighted to announce that the proposal to release Apache Calcite 1.25.0 has passed. Thanks everyone. We’ll now roll the release out to the mirrors. I will also update release notes (in separate commit) to better reflect 1.25.0 changes. Please

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Ruben Quesada Lopez joins Calcite PMC

Congratulations, Ruben! On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 1:21 PM Rui Wang wrote: > Congrats, Ruben! Well deserved! > > > > -Rui > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 9:24 AM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > Congrats Ruben! > > > > Enrico > > > > Il Mer 12 Ago 2020, 18:05 Michael Mior ha scritto: > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.25.0 (release candidate 0)

Hi All, I plan to close the vote tomorrow (Aug 12th). If you still want to validate RC0 please do so before Wednesday. Regards, Andrei. On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 1:13 PM Andrei Sereda wrote: > Thanks, Julian, for the hint. I'll update the KEYS file. > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 11:59

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.25.0 (release candidate 0)

r key was still ‘unknown’ according to gpg. > > Julian > > > On Aug 11, 2020, at 8:04 AM, Andrei Sereda wrote: > > > >  > >> > >> * Andrei, I don’t think your key is in KEYS. Be sure to add it before > the > > release announcement. > > &

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.25.0 (release candidate 0)

> * Andrei, I don’t think your key is in KEYS. Be sure to add it before the release announcement. I see my signing key in KEYS $ curl -s https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/calcite/KEYS | grep sereda sig C41CFDDFED34C028 2019-08-19 Andrei Sereda (CODE SIGNING KEY) &l

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.25.0 (release candidate 0)

changes, > those can be updated after release. > > - Haisheng > > On 2020/08/09 03:22:28, Andrei Sereda wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I have created a build for Apache Calcite 1.25.0, release > > candidate 0. > > > > Thanks to everyone who has contributed

[VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.25.0 (release candidate 0)

Hi all, I have created a build for Apache Calcite 1.25.0, release candidate 0. Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release. You can read the release notes here: https://apache.github.io/calcite-site-preview/docs/history.html The commit to be voted upon:

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.25.0

I would say yes. On Sat, Aug 8, 2020, 13:32 Rui Wang wrote: > Is the highlight section a right place for [1] as it has bigger impact? > > > [1] > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/19edf52c76c6a1507721f5bd37f2a33497aa0c4c > > -Rui > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 a

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.25.0

, 2020 at 11:12 AM Andrei Sereda wrote: > Hello, > > I'm starting the release today. If there are some PRs which you would like > to be included in 1.25 please let me know ASAP. > > This should be a quick release mostly for CALCITE-4136 > > Thanks, > Andrei. > > On F

master locked during 1.25.0 release

Hello, Please avoid committing anything to master while 1.25.0 release is in progress. It will be unlocked after the voting / successful release. Many thanks, Andrei.

[jira] [Created] (CALCITE-4169) Release Calcite 1.25.0

Andrei Sereda created CALCITE-4169: -- Summary: Release Calcite 1.25.0 Key: CALCITE-4169 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4169 Project: Calcite Issue Type: Task

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.25.0

his would be a quick release. Above I mentioned Aug > 8th as a target, and it's Aug 7th already. Can you start moving the > release process along, please. > > Julian > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 2:23 PM Andrei Sereda wrote: > > > > Julian, > > > > Yes th

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.25.0

d get this done in by Aug 8 - i.e. 2 weeks > - if we focus.) > > Julian > > > > On Jul 24, 2020, at 9:57 AM, Andrei Sereda wrote: > > > > It should be me. > > > > I swapped the 1.22 release with Danny Chen who was supposed to be release > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.25.0

It should be me. I swapped the 1.22 release with Danny Chen who was supposed to be release manager for 1.25 On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 12:52 PM Haisheng Yuan wrote: > Do we have release manager for v1.25.0? > > > On 2020/07/23 17:15:12, Julian Hyde wrote: > > The release vote for 1.24 RC0 just

Re: Calcite PR CI offten failed due to elasticsearch:test

Hello, I'll take a look at failing tests. It seems that embedded ES doesn't start correctly. Andrei. On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 10:21 PM JiaTao Tao wrote: > another case > https://travis-ci.org/github/apache/calcite/jobs/706573803 > > FAILURE 0.0sec, org.apache.calcite.test.RelMetadataTest > >

[jira] [Created] (CALCITE-3912) Incorrect mapping parsing when properties have same name as reserved keywords in ElasticSearch

Andrei Sereda created CALCITE-3912: -- Summary: Incorrect mapping parsing when properties have same name as reserved keywords in ElasticSearch Key: CALCITE-3912 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.22

Thanks for stepping in Danny. Can I take your release ? On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 2:34 PM Julian Hyde wrote: > It would be helpful for us to test third-party projects. > > But equally, it is useful for third-party projects to test against us. > (Especially non-open-source ones, which we cannot

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.22

Is there anyone willing to swap a Calcite release with me ? On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 12:41 PM Andrei Sereda wrote: > Hi Julian et al, > > Unfortunately my current work schedule is still very tense. There are some > internal deadlines that have passed already. > > I would a

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.22

elease in December, then it was pushed back > to mid-January. We can't wait much longer. > > Julian > > On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 8:07 AM Andrei Sereda wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I would like to ask community if it is OK if 1.22 release gets delayed by > > 2-3 weeks ? &

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.22

>> Thank you for your work, Anderi. > >>> > >>> Let's get CALCITE-1581[1] into 1.22. > >>> > >>> +1 for release at early-mid January '20 (to have more time to review > >> prs). > >>> > >>> > >>> [1] https://github.c

Re: Usage of SqlStdOperatorTable.BETWEEN from RelBuilder

Hi Hrudaya, It seems that SqlBetweenOperator doesn’t correctly infer return type when created by RexBuilder. As a workaround, can you replace BETWEEN by composition of two ANDs ? (user_id >= 1 AND user_id <= 5) // RelBuilder builder = ... builder.scan("users"); RexNode condition1 =

Re: Calcite Adapter Question

Hi Charles, There is some documentation here https://calcite.apache.org/docs/adapter.html it describes how to setup and use an adapter. Note that you can only use those adapters within calcite runtime and not as a standalone library. Typical adapter would expose collection (for Mongo), index

Re: Draft board report for January 2020

+1 Question regarding Hazelcast : > Finally, the Hazelcast system has decided to adopt Calcite for query planning. Was it Ignite [1] or Hazelcast team to adopt (prototype) Calcite ?

Re: CsvAdapter (Json content) from String / InputStream

one to > convert *JAVA.UTIL.ARRAYLIST on SQL_ARRAY type right ? > > thank > > > > Le lun. 18 nov. 2019 à 19:15, Yanna elina a > écrit : > > > Big Thank Guys !!! > > > > Even if this CSVAdapter is an "example" its still really usefull :)

[jira] [Created] (CALCITE-3560) Allow generic data source (eg. InputStream) in CSVAdapter or FileAdapter(s)

Andrei Sereda created CALCITE-3560: -- Summary: Allow generic data source (eg. InputStream) in CSVAdapter or FileAdapter(s) Key: CALCITE-3560 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3560

Re: JUnit 4 and JUnit 5 annotations do not mix well

Thanks Vladimir. Most of the changes look find to me (left a small comment in PR) Once merged, I'll take care of remaining JUnit4 rules for Cassandra/ElasticSearch/Mongo etc. On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 1:23 PM Vladimir Sitnikov < sitnikov.vladi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ok, I think PR1621 is ready to

[DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.22

Hello, Calcite 1.21 was released about 3 months ago (2019-09) and it is time to start preparation for 1.22. Current open issues and pull requests can be seen in [1] and [2]. There are many PRs left from previous releases and it would be nice to review as many as possible. Please change "fix

Re: JUnit 4 and JUnit 5 annotations do not mix well

I also lean towards updating existing tests to JUnit5. Perhaps split it into two parts: 1. The ones that can be migrated easily (replacing annotations, minimal manual intervention) 2. Existing JUnit 4 rules / parameterized tests JUnit4 and JUnit5 can coexists and evaluated by the same engine.

Re: JUnit 4 and JUnit 5 annotations do not mix well

t; > I remember that we had a discussion around the subject before but I cannot > find the thread at the moment. > > > On Mon, Dec 2, 2019, 5:58 PM Andrei Sereda wrote: > > > Do you think it makes sense to perform a bulk string/replace for JUnit 4 > -> > > 5

Re: JUnit 4 and JUnit 5 annotations do not mix well

Do you think it makes sense to perform a bulk string/replace for JUnit 4 -> 5 annotations ? At least for simple non-parameterized / no-rules tests. This way IDE will automatically select correct annotations. I had some scripts prepared as part of CALCITE-2457 [1]

Re: JProfiler license for committers

> Stamatis, Andrei, have you considered JFR / async-profiler? I'm happy to try it On Sun, Dec 1, 2019 at 3:02 PM Vladimir Sitnikov < sitnikov.vladi...@gmail.com> wrote: > I find Java Flight Recorder and async-profiler to be good enough. > Both tools are free to use, they both can be used to

Re: JProfiler license for committers

I was also thinking getting open-source license for one of the profiling tools. I'm more familiar with YourKit but if JProfiler is comparable then don't have any preference. On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 1:57 AM Danny Chan wrote: > Personally I did not use JProfiler pretty much often, but adding the

Re: CsvAdapter (Json content) from String / InputStream

in the > file adapter. > > Julian > > > > On Nov 14, 2019, at 11:36 AM, Andrei Sereda wrote: > > > > I think the change is straightforward (will not add complexity). > > > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 1:24 PM Julian Hyde wrote: > > > >> Rememb

Re: CsvAdapter (Json content) from String / InputStream

I think the change is straightforward (will not add complexity). On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 1:24 PM Julian Hyde wrote: > Remember that CsvAdapter is in the “example” module. Keep it simple. > > The file adapter can also parse CSV files. > > Julian > > > > > On No

Re: CsvAdapter (Json content) from String / InputStream

Hello, Source object already exposes Reader / InputStream API. Probably JsonEnumerator can be changed to use those methods. Do you mind creating a JIRA ticket ? I'll take a look. Thanks, Andrei. On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 7:45 AM Yanna elina wrote: > Hi guys , > I saw in the code that this nice

[jira] [Created] (CALCITE-3502) Upgrade Geode 1.6.0 -> 1.9.2

Andrei Sereda created CALCITE-3502: -- Summary: Upgrade Geode 1.6.0 -> 1.9.2 Key: CALCITE-3502 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3502 Project: Calcite Issue Type: Improvem

Re: use calcite jdbc query mysql only return 10 records

This was fixed in 1.18.0 (see CALCITE-2651). You can always manually set LIMIT. ES returns by default 10 records. Now calcite uses scrolling to fetch whole index. On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 2:43 PM James James wrote: > Dear > > Recently I ticked in to a problem that use jdbc:calcite method get >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Danny Chan joins Calcite PMC

Congrats, Danny! On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 8:08 PM Julian Hyde wrote: > Congratulations, Danny! Thank you for all of your hard work on code, > reviewing others' work, answering questions, and generally making our > community welcoming to all! > > Julian > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 4:32 PM Michael

Re: Calcite - Model - MongoDB view

Hi Neha Saini, I'm afraid currently array access is not translated in mongo adapter. There is a PR https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/720 which needs to be corrected. Thanks, Andrei. On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 3:01 AM Danny Chan wrote: > Hi, Neha Saini > > What do you mean by MongoDB view,

Re: Apache Calcite Geode

Hi Viquar Khan, Currently write operations (UPDATE / DELETE / INSERT) are not supported by geode-calcite adapter. You need to load data using native API then query it using Calcite. There is some documentation on our website: https://calcite.apache.org/docs/geode_adapter.html but it is by no

Re: Cannot connect to ES

HTTPS support was added recently (see CALCITE-3335 ). To be released in 1.22 Currently ES configuration expects hostname without schema prefix (eg. https://). On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 9:52 PM Danny Chan wrote: > It seems that the host name

Re: How to connect es5 in the latest mainline code?

Hi Chen, Please use the latest calcite version 1.21 which has dependency on ES 7.x low-level rest client. We have removed elasticsearch5 and elasticsearch2 maven modules in favor of a single elasticsearch (which uses rest-client in favor of transport client) in CALCITE-2376

Re: [DISCUSS] Small contributions

I presume 3rd party library upgrades should go through regular process (jira/PR etc.) ? Dependency upgrade is not considered "small change" since impact is greater than just a "typo fix". On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 1:47 PM Julian Hyde wrote: > A few points. > > I don’t like the term “hot fix”.

Re: How to connect es5 in the latest mainline code?

Hello, What version of calcite are you using ? Can you try with latest 1.21 release ? elasticsearch5 module has been removed a while ago. Also we recommend using ES 6.2+ with calcite. Thanks, Andrei. On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 9:31 AM

Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Julian Feinauer

Congratulations, Julian ! On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 11:26 PM Amit Chavan wrote: > Congrats, Julian !! > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 8:12 PM XING JIN wrote: > > > Congrats, Julian ! > > You are well deserved ~ > > > > Haisheng Yuan 于2019年9月18日周三 上午10:38写道： > > > > > Congrats, Julian! > > > > > > -

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Muhammad Gelbana

Congrats, Muhammad! On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 11:26 PM Amit Chavan wrote: > Congratulations, Muhammad !! > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 8:10 PM XING JIN wrote: > > > Congrats, Muhammad ! > > > > 王炎林 <1989yanlinw...@163.com> 于2019年9月18日周三 上午10:38写道： > > > > > Congratulations, Muhammad! > > > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.21.0 (release candidate 1)

+1 (non-binding) Minor correction: sha256 of source distribution (apache-calcite-1.21.0-src.tar.gz) is ccd10264f89a84bc750837cc2d0e66b7d74a81dd825d0a88f501153d4745eee3 Environment: Mac OS X Java version: 11.0.4, vendor: AdoptOpenJDK Maven 3.6.1 mvn clean install - OK sh256 check - OK GPG check

Re: Virtual key signing party

forced to revoke it. > The one I send earlier is my new key. > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:43 PM Andrei Sereda wrote: > > > If there are more people interested I'll join the party (this or next > > week). > > > > Stamatis and I signed each others keys a while

Re: Virtual key signing party

If there are more people interested I'll join the party (this or next week). Stamatis and I signed each others keys a while ago. pub rsa4096 2018-10-18 [SC] 25E7 0310 6B1B 3D7B 1050 32BD C41C FDDF ED34 C028 uid [ultimate] Andrei Sereda (CODE SIGNING KEY) uid

  1   2   3   4   >