>They have a purpose
Hey Julian, would you please kindly to explain what is the purpose of
calcite and calcite-examples artifacts?
Vladimir
I disagree. They have a purpose. We used to publish them, and we
should continue to publish them.
If you had a good reason to publishing them when you migrated us to
Gradle, you should have let us know.
One negative side-effect is that if you search for "apache calcite" on
Maven Central [1] it
The artifacts have no purpose, they do not exist, so they are not published.
Vladimis
Rather than opening up a new debate, can we just carry on doing what we always
did?
> On Apr 28, 2020, at 12:03 PM, Vladimir Sitnikov
> wrote:
>
>> If you search for Calcite on Maven Central [1] you will see that the
> latest version of the “calcite” and “calcite-examples” artifacts is 1.21,
> If you search for Calcite on Maven Central [1] you will see that the
latest version of the “calcite” and “calcite-examples” artifacts is 1.21,
whereas the latest version of everything else is 1.22.
What is the purpose of "calcite" artifact?
Was
org.apache.calcitecalcite
useful?
A missing bit
If you search for Calcite on Maven Central [1] you will see that the latest
version of the “calcite” and “calcite-examples” artifacts is 1.21, whereas the
latest version of everything else is 1.22.
Is this intended behavior, or a mistake introduced by the move to Gradle?
Julian
[1]
