Hey Julian,
Thanks, I have subscribed to the list now.
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 10:58 PM Julian Hyde wrote:
> Your message was received. I guess no one had the time to respond.
>
> Can you please subscribe to the list? I had to moderate your message
> through because you are not a subscriber.
>
Hi，Sgybham,
According to our study, it is developed for Spark 1.x and not powerful in
production.
Rather than relying on Spark adapter, I suggest you convert RelNode back to
SQL based on SparkSqlDialect, and then execute them by Spark SQL.
Shubham Kumar 于2019年8月29日周四 上午1:26写道：
> Hey,
>
> Does
Your message was received. I guess no one had the time to respond.
Can you please subscribe to the list? I had to moderate your message through
because you are not a subscriber.
Julian
> On Aug 28, 2019, at 9:03 AM, Shubham Kumar wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
> Does anyone have any insights on this?
Hey,
Does anyone have any insights on this? Also wanted to confirm that it is
being sent on the mailing list of Calcite.
Thanks
Shubham
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 6:16 PM Shubham Kumar
wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I am trying to optimize queries by creating materialized views in Hive and
> then exposing
Hey,
I am trying to optimize queries by creating materialized views in Hive and
then exposing them to Calcite for optimized query rewrite.
I wanted to know that how mature is the spark adapter of Calcite i.e. Let's
say while making the connection I set parameter spark=true
