On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 6:13 PM Gary Gregory wrote:
> > I can do the 64 bit builds on Mac, Linux and Windows, so I'm happy to
> > provide whichever of those is required. It seems that Geoff can do the
> > arm64 build. Do we even bother supporting 32 bit architectures at this
> > point?
>
>
Hi.
2020-04-13 1:08 UTC+02:00, Xeno Amess :
> most of commons projects use travis-ci but only few of them uses cache for
> .m2
> for example, commons-lang's .travis.yml looks like:
>
> language: java
> jdk:
> - openjdk8
> - openjdk11
> - openjdk13
> - openjdk-ea
>
> matrix:
> include:
>
On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 8:57 PM Alex Remily wrote:
> I can do the 64 bit builds on Mac, Linux and Windows, so I'm happy to
> provide whichever of those is required. It seems that Geoff can do the
> arm64 build. Do we even bother supporting 32 bit architectures at this
> point?
>
I can do the 64 bit builds on Mac, Linux and Windows, so I'm happy to
provide whichever of those is required. It seems that Geoff can do the
arm64 build. Do we even bother supporting 32 bit architectures at this
point?
On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 7:36 PM Marcelo Vanzin wrote:
> Hi Gary,
>
> On
Hi Gary,
On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 8:53 AM Gary Gregory wrote:
> > The 1.0 release on maven central only included linux32 and linux64 native
> > libs, even though the Makefile supports many more targets
> >
>
> Please see the snapshot builds which now include more:
>
2020-04-12 20:23 UTC+02:00, Alex Herbert :
>
>> On 12 Apr 2020, at 15:58, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>>
>> Hi.
>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> I propose to release version
>>>0.1-beta1
>>> of "Commons Statistics", as part of the dependency
>>> requirements for a beta release of the next major version
>>> of
most of commons projects use travis-ci but only few of them uses cache for
.m2
for example, commons-lang's .travis.yml looks like:
language: java
jdk:
- openjdk8
- openjdk11
- openjdk13
- openjdk-ea
matrix:
include:
- os: linux-ppc64le
jdk: openjdk8
allow_failures:
-
> On 12 Apr 2020, at 15:58, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
>> [...]
>>
>> I propose to release version
>>0.1-beta1
>> of "Commons Statistics", as part of the dependency
>> requirements for a beta release of the next major version
>> of "Commons Math".
>>
>
> Should we change the
I can look into the code coverage this week. The arm64 build needs to be
included, I can provide that from rhel8 if needed. I believe the target is
in the pom file.
On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 11:14 AM Alex Remily wrote:
> I'll see if I can look at the code coverage this week. Today is busy with
Very cool! Would it be possible to get this one included -
https://github.com/apache/commons-io/pull/110
On Sun, 12 Apr 2020 at 17:54, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Hi All:
>
> It's been a long time since 2.6, so plan on cutting an RC for 2.7 soon-ish.
>
> Gary
--
Adam Retter
skype: adam.retter
I'll see if I can look at the code coverage this week. Today is busy with
family stuff. I can contribute an OS X build (High Sierra) if you're
looking for one.
Alex
On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 11:53 AM Gary Gregory
wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 10:49 AM Geoffrey Blake <
>
Hi All:
It's been a long time since 2.6, so plan on cutting an RC for 2.7 soon-ish.
Gary
On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 10:49 AM Geoffrey Blake
wrote:
> Gary, Alex,
>
> Let me know what else needs doing.
Hi All:
See my previous email WRT code coverage using JaCoCo.
> I can certainly help with building
> artifacts, just need guidance on minimum distro and Java to use.
>
Thank you for
Hi.
> [...]
>
> I propose to release version
> 0.1-beta1
> of "Commons Statistics", as part of the dependency
> requirements for a beta release of the next major version
> of "Commons Math".
>
Should we change the "version" from
0.1-beta1
to
1.0-beta1
?
The rationale for a 0.x was
Gary, Alex,
Let me know what else needs doing. I can certainly help with building
artifacts, just need guidance on minimum distro and Java to use.
The 1.0 release on maven central only included linux32 and linux64 native
libs, even though the Makefile supports many more targets
-Geoff
On Sun,
On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 1:55 PM Alex Remily wrote:
> This looks to be done. I added a comment to the ticket with a link to the
> commit.
>
>
> https://github.com/apache/commons-crypto/commit/3466943e4552474ab681d7852dbfa62c74d8e1ce
Thanks Alex, I resolved the parent ticket and added it to
16 matches
Mail list logo
