On 15/09/2017 Isabel Drost-Fromm wrote:
Am 12. September 2017 23:27:42 MESZ schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
That is what I am required to obey each year when selecting talks for
the devroom I co-organize.
Who is asking you to obey that?
At some time in 2012, when I was organizing the current
On 06/09/2017 Sharan Foga wrote:
It sounds like the general feeling is to do it, so I will put something
together for the Developer room request.
Note that I submitted a request on behalf of the OpenOffice PMC to have
the traditional "ODF Editors" devroom that has been co-organized by
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
people.a.o is gone and/or there is some sort of ssh problem with both
people.a.o and home.a.o.
You must use minotaur.
Old people.apache.org = minotaur.apache.org (SSH accepted, your old
stuff is here)
New people.apache.org = home.apache.org (SFTP only, only
Daniel Gruno wrote:
Thank you so much for an amazing FOSDEM last week!
Thank you for being there and for the report! I had to cancel my
attendance just a few hours before my scheduled departure, but it's
great to know that the ASF booth was successful as expected. This is
probably the first
Daniel Gruno wrote:
We have been granted a 2-table stand (the biggest they could offer) at
FOSDEM to represent the ASF and its projects.
Good news! The OpenOffice booth request (which had been sent as a
backup, with the explicit indication that it should be ignored if the
ASF one was
Daniel Gruno wrote:
On 12/15/2015 11:01 AM, Upayavira wrote:
I also currently plan to attend, but can't update the wiki.
I've added you, Sharan and Pierre to the wiki space now.
Can I be added too, please? I also currently plan to attend, but can't
update the wiki.
Thanks,
Andrea.
Jim Jagielski wrote:
To be clear, we ask first, and ensure that we edit out info
that she doesn't want public.
I agree we should ask her for permission to publish an edited version of
her letter. Actually https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/pmc/ is
already a public place and this is
On 29/09/2015 RA Stehmann wrote:
On 28.09.2015 23:08, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
So you think it's better not to apply (additionally) as OpenOffice? We
don't have any assurance that the ASF will be granted a stand, and
OpenOffice has always been granted one for years.
Before your posting, I've
Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
I am not aware of any other devrooms with strong affinity to
ASF projects
http://s.apache.org/rCo
but if you know of any please add them to the wiki.
I don't have time/access now.
And I can now confirm that my privileges do not allow me
Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
I'm happy to announce that our proposal
for Big data and Datascience devroom got accepted
and I would expect a lot of ASF projects to be represented there:
https://hpc-bigdata-fosdem16.github.io/
I am not aware of any other devrooms with strong affinity to
ASF
Pierre Smits wrote:
I also submitted a talk.
It seems quite early to submit a talk. In order to submit one, you need
that a devroom sends out their call for talks, and devrooms won't be
defined until next week.
Maybe you submitted one for the main track? Usually competition for that
track
On 06/10/2015 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
I'm going to submit a proposal for an ODF Editors devroom too, similar
to http://s.apache.org/ved (the one we sent last year).
This was sent yesterday. I didn't CC the list since submissions now
happen through a web form, but content is not much different
Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
just wanted to let you guys know that I've just submitted
a proposal for Big Data and Data Science devroom for
FOSDEM.
Good!
Not sure how to increase our chances of being accepted,
but would love any feedback on that.
Both booths/stands and devrooms are accepted (or
Pierre Smits wrote:
Thank you all for having a great Apachecon experience
+1, thank you all, especially Jan, the Linux Foundation, Rich and the
surely many others who in a way or another made sure we could have a
great ApacheCon.
I had to miss most of it due to unforeseen problems, but I'm
On 28/09/2015 RA Stehmann wrote:
as promised Mechtilde and I will join the Apache booth (stand) team at
FOSDEM 2016.
So you think it's better not to apply (additionally) as OpenOffice? We
don't have any assurance that the ASF will be granted a stand, and
OpenOffice has always been granted
On 25/09/2015 Daniel Gruno wrote:
On 09/25/2015 09:11 AM, Sharan Foga wrote:
I've just seen this call for participation at FOSDEM and I know we
talked about getting more of an Apache presence there.
https://fosdem.org/2016/news/2015-09-24-call-for-participation/
Indeedy, I was notified by
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
It is useful that this kind of feedback reaches ComDev, so projects learn
from each other and can make informed decisions.
As Jan and me have written several times, OpenOffice moved its "Extras"
area (which, in the OpenOffice case, consists simply in a binary file
Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
On the other hand, somebody taking said snapshot and releasing it under the
name Project BOO, licensed under the ALv2. Is something that both the ALv2
license AND our trademark policy are totally fine with.
What if (not a fictional example; a real case) the code is
On 17/07/2015 Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
What's the process of proposing a dev room? For example, last year
I really wanted to do bigdata and/or data science dev. room
You wait for the call and you send a proposal. I mean, this whole thread
does not have a big value until the calls are out...
On 15/07/2015 jan i wrote:
On 14 July 2015 at 09:06, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 13/07/2015 jan i wrote:
who takes lead on keeping an eye on the FOSDEM team?
I usually monitor that, and I can notify this list too this year (even
though now is way too early for me to have any ideas about my
On 13/07/2015 jan i wrote:
that was my understanding as well. AOO moved a while ago.
OpenOffice hasn't properly moved, and actually we need to get this done
by the next release. The current URL is temporary as
oooextras.mirror does not make sense (it is not a mirror) and it was
meant to
On 13/07/2015 sebb wrote:
There's an old typo I spotted long ago; I would have fixed it myself, but I
got lost when trying to locate the site sources.
https://projects.apache.org/projects.html in the left block you have By
Progamming [sic] language.
Fixed in
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1690644
Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
As the title says, projects is now projects-new:
http://projects.apache.org
Nice!
Please report if there is any issue
There's an old typo I spotted long ago; I would have fixed it myself,
but I got lost when trying to locate the site sources.
jan i wrote:
Apache Big Data has July 10th as deadline for CFP.
Then https://wiki.apache.org/apachecon/FrontPage should be corrected. It
still lists today as deadline for Core (and that's OK) and July 15th as
deadline for Big Data (and that should be changed if it's July 10th as
you state
Edward J. Yoon wrote:
Just FYI, here's my slides -
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1ScAzW37oEYnaYR8yNZCyJlk_lnssSAXopeZ0NUmPoeg/edit?usp=sharing
What do you mean by
ASF philosophy is that code can be used commercially w/ restrictions?
If it's not a typo, can you expand on it?
The rest
Betty James wrote:
How do I get off this thread. don't know how I got on
Just follow the instructions others have already provided. I'm putting
you in CC in case you have already unsubscribed from this discussion list.
but I am just a totally ignorant individual using Open Office and
On 19/04/2015 Mattmann, Chris A (3980) wrote:
Thanks Andrea. I don’t see them there yet, so maybe they are
still delayed. Do you know how I can check if they are delayed,
or if I simply uploaded them wrong?
For the ACEU14 site (which seems to be the same system) I checked that
it was working
Mattmann, Chris A (3980) wrote:
Great seeing you all at ApacheCon. Quick question - I got my
slides uploaded after my talk(s) (late of course) to the website -
who should I poke at LF to make sure they are on the website? I
am not seeing them and I’m sure it’s something I’m doing wrong?
On 22/03/2015 Nick Burch wrote:
On 20/03/15 19:46, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
ApacheCon EU 2014
http://people.apache.org/~nick/NickTemplateACEU14.odp
(this ought to have been uploaded to the Templates site too ...)
I've just tried to upload it, but after creating an account
On 19/03/2015 Rich Bowen wrote:
http://templates.openoffice.org/en/search?search_api_views_fulltext=apacheconsort_by=createdsort_order=ASC
and also
http://people.apache.org/~nick/NickTemplateACEU14.odp
Also, see
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/community-dev/201411.mbox/browser
for
On 12/03/2015 Roger and Beth Whitcomb wrote:
I was involved at one point on behalf of Pivot (where we have several
projects), and Andrea Pescetti on behalf of Open Office was also
involved (since they have a bunch of stuff there). But things have gone
quiet for about 2 months
Rich Bowen wrote:
For those that weren't there, you should know that OpenOffice had a
presence there (as they always have), staffed by volunteers, with some
swag provided by the ASF, and other swag provided by the OpenOffice
community, out of their own pockets. They did an *awesome* job of
On 06/01/2015 Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
With regard to competitors, I just remind myself that forking is a
feature and that community before code means not acting like a
competitor. One should not accept the so-called competitor's terms
of debate, no matter how much individuals might see and
On 13/12/2014 jan i wrote:
The Travel Assistance Committee (TAC) are pleased to announce that travel
assistance applications for ApacheCon North America 2015 are now open! ...
http://www.apache.org/travel/
The passport/visa information on that page are still the ones for
Budapest and EU
On 06/01/2015 Vincent Keunen wrote:
On 2015-01-06 19:15, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
convenience binaries are not Apache Releases.
Let's not forget OpenOffice and the likes. Having all users compile the
source code *may* reduce the installed base. ;-)
The binaries OpenOffice makes available
On 06/01/2015 Tim Williams wrote:
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
The binaries OpenOffice makes available for download from its official site
are convenience binaries as per Bertrand's description. We are not going
to ask users to build it themselves!
We're heading off
On 30/12/2014 Rich Bowen wrote:
Angela responds: ...
http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/apachecon-europe/program/slides
OK, thanks!
Regards,
Andrea.
A few days ago, after being appropriately nagged by the ApacheCon system
and having ignored it for a while, I uploaded my slides to the ApacheCon
site, hoping that this way they would be visible to everybody.
But then I noticed that slides live on the submissions site
On 04/12/2014 jan i wrote:
I read what you are saying, but we actually sent a lot of mails out, my
concern is that more mails would just be spam.
Late as usual, I join the group, thanking all people involved for
organizing a great event. And I believe that promotion was absolutely
enough.
On 22/11/2014 Rich Bowen wrote:
At ApacheCon EU this week, I spoke with a number of project PMCs. I
requested that they attempt to put together what they feel would be a
good track - ie., a list of topics that they feel would need to be
covered in order for their project to be properly
Christoph Emmersberger wrote:
Just wanted to raise the question, if mirroring has been considered
at any stage, or if this is completely out of scope. The mirrors are
rather a developer convenience and not meant to replace the main
repositories.
If you are suggesting that this mirroring
On 24/10/2014 Rich Bowen wrote:
One more try - can any of you fine OpenOffice folks whip up a slide
template for ApacheCon EU, like was done for Denver?
Let's forward this to the OpenOffice dev list too (in CC) and see if it
is a yes! Volunteers? Templates to be refreshed are here:
On 01/10/2014 David Nalley wrote:
Roberto and others from Sourceforge have set up a proof of concept for
the SF-based replacement for Apache Extras. You can take a look below.
Comments/Input welcome.
https://sourceforge.net/directory/vertical:Apache-Extras/
This was sent to the dev@community
On 23/10/2014 Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo wrote:
That's because dev@community is a Apache Software Foundation-wide
mailing list, not an OpenOffice.org-specific one.
And David did the right thing by e-mailing the dev@community list:
Apache Extras is foundation-wide (not OpenOffice-specific)
Joe Brockmeier wrote:
I'm including a list of suggested tweets for *all* talks at ApacheCon EU
here. It'd be great if we could start using these and tweeting from
project and personal accounts.
This is a nice idea!
Apache @OpenOfficeorg's @pescetti discusses Bending The Rules:
Community Over
Joe Brockmeier wrote:
Sorry - disregard previous list. Corrected keynote info and used the
correct (I believe) Apache OpenOffice twitter handle this time.
Thanks, I confirm the correction is OK, it's the same I asked for in a
message sent simultaneously to your self-correction. I will send a
On 19/09/2014 Rich Bowen wrote:
Here's the most important ways that you can help with ApacheCon EU right
now, in order of importance.
* If you are involved in an Apache project that has content at
ApacheCon, send messages to your users@ and dev@ list
Done for the OpenOffice lists, adapting the
Two very small issues that I met while registering for ApacheCon:
1) Tutorials hours have an unnecessary (actually, wrong) Mountain time
qualifier: http://i.imgur.com/G01c00n.png
2) The Terms and conditions say that photographs and recordings may be
used for publicity purposes for the Linux
On 08/08/2014 Rich Bowen wrote:
* Read titles and abstracts. Can they be improved? Is a title unclear,
not compelling, not descriptive, just plain boring? Are there typos,
grammatical errors, or awkward sentences in the abstract? Are there
placeholders that need to be filled? That kind of thing.
On 27/08/2014 Rich Bowen wrote:
If you want to do some kind of event on Thursday or Friday, like an Open
Office hackathon, or even present more content, please let me know soon,
as people are already making travel/lodging plans and those will be
harder to change as time goes on.
Thanks, I
On 22/08/2014 Melissa Warnkin wrote:
So I thought I'd share some exciting news with you! Back in February,
Shane and I were working with the Clearances Script Coordinator for
*/Nine Productions1 Inc. /* regarding permission to use OpenOffice in
their TV series, Intruders. The US premiere is
Branko Čibej wrote:
I don't know where you got this, but it definitely is not true that
every PMC chair is a member. This is not even a requirement.
Sure. I became PMC chair before being voted in as a member, for example.
It is
possible and reasonable that an entire project community
Melissa Warnkin wrote:
I can make room on the table for pins. When you refer to leaflet and
roll-up designs, what is that and how much real estate would they
take up?
I'll explain better: physical objects are not available, meaning that
either they haven't been printed yet or they are in
Kay Schenk wrote:
OK, I'll ask about this. I think OpenOffice does have some popular items
that have been used at other events.
It's out of stock and needs redesign. But we could at least redesign the
pins, that used to be quite popular. We have updated leaflet and roll-up
designs, that we
Rich Bowen wrote:
The ApacheCon EU CFP closes in a week, as you know. We need your help
reviewing the talks that have been submitted. Those of you who helped
with Denver are already on the list, but if there are other people that
want to be involved in reviewing the content and selecting the
On 02/05/2014 Melissa Warnkin wrote:
The size of the case is 51x24x10, and IIRC the case alone weighs approx 20-25
lbs.
Is the size measured in cm or in? If it's inches, this will be quite
problematic to carry around Europe, no matter how much space Jan has at
home. If it is centimeters,
On 22/04/2014 Storm-Olsen, Marius wrote:
As part of the research into a thesis on Open Source Organizational
Culture, I want to send out a short survey to the Apache organization.
However, given that the Apache community is so large, with numerous
individual projects under its umbrella, I wanted
On 23/04/2014 Rich Bowen wrote:
If you would like to be involved in reviewing the content for the
conference, please let me know.
I missed Denver but I'll be happy to help with Budapest. Account pescetti.
The conference format is 3+2 - three days keynotes and conference
sessions, then two
Melissa Warnkin wrote:
Hi Andrea, I see you have a note in the s/s wrt contacting dev@;
thank you for that! Have you sent an email to the users@ and speakers
as well for OpenOffice?
I've done it now. See updated Google Doc.
Regards,
Andrea.
Jim Jagielski wrote:
One reason for the 72hour rule is to ensure that no PMC
member feels disenfranchised. ...
PMCs are *inclusive*. The processes and procedures are
designed to maintain that inclusivity.
This is not 100% incompatible with 12-hour votes.
Our current rules assume that the PMC
Arnaldo Carbone wrote:
now I will send a mail to d...@openoffice.org
Sorry about the confusion, Jan's link below is indeed wrong, the Apache
OpenOffice lists are at http://openoffice.apache.org/mailing-lists.html
proposal: to make possible to change the shape and the color of the
cursor
Arnaldo Carbone wrote:
Hi there; it is so difficult to contact you! everytime I tryed to do it, I
had an automatic failure message back! please contact me!
Arnaldo, you should be a little clearer. I received a message from you
at progetto-it-owner AT openoffice.apache.org (a mailing list in
On 22/12/2013 Jacques Le Roux wrote:
OFBiz is concerned as well. We have several components there and we
would like to know if a replacement solution has been planned?
https://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/hosting/search?q=label%3aOFBiz
Another round of Board reports, so I'm asking if
On 13/12/2013 Rich Bowen wrote:
I expect that once we have a contract signed (within the next two weeks,
I sincerely hope), we'll have a CFP out very soon, and then it'll run
through January. Once the CFP closes, I expect there would be a brief
(couple weeks?) period in which the talks would be
On 20/11/2013 Isabel Drost-Fromm wrote:
If there are any plans to have another Open Office booth at
Linuxtage - maybe it would make sense to also ship some more general
ASF merchandise?
Michael was very quick and already sent the application a couple days
ago, see
On 26/10/2013 Ulrich Stärk wrote:
just a bit more information on GCI. We need 20 tasks already for the org
application to be
considered. Just wanted to let you know.
Thank you; we already have enough tasks, but we didn't find enough
volunteers to mentor them. So OpenOffice won't be asking
On 28/10/2013 Roger Whitcomb wrote:
P.S. Apache OpenOffice are also concerned, so I have copied them as well.
Thanks. As stated in last July's OpenOffice Board Report:
---
OpenOffice, like the ASF as a whole, is hit by the announced policy
change of Apache Extras. The project currently
On 13/10/2013 Isabel Drost-Fromm wrote:
On Saturday, October 12, 2013 11:59:35 AM Bob McElmurry wrote:
I have not found some of
the functions that I like such as countifs, sumifs, and averageifs.
Because of using these functions, I do not feel that it would be an asset
to change to OpenOffice.
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 3:02 PM, janI wrote:
friday august 16 from approx. utc 17:00 and until sunday night, all forums
will be down for maintenance...
Which forums?
The OpenOffice Forums... That was for dev@openoffice.a.o
Regards,
Andrea.
Joe Brockmeier wrote:
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013, at 04:12 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/homepage/google/gsoc2013
Am I missing something, or did Apache not make it this year?!
I'm wondering if the list is fully populated. Front page says 177
organizations, the accepted orgs
On 15/03/2013 Luciano Resende wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Manish Agrawaltext2man...@gmail.com wrote:
I want to participate in GSoC 2013 through one of the ASF projects. [...]
The projects are starting to create their project ideas, and you can
start browsing them at
71 matches
Mail list logo
