Our website footers proclaim content contained there are licensed under ALv2
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 10:02 AM Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> FWIW, I asked this question years ago, and never got a clear answer. I
> think they are HJTI (http://drbacchus.com/hjti) but the real answer is
> that they do not
On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 3:15 PM Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> I've made two posts on this list in the past couple of days regarding
> the rising ACL effort and my concerns about it.
>
> I *desperately* want this kind of grass-roots enthusiast community
> effort. I do NOT want to kill it. But I've learned
This is a 2 hour drive from my house, so provided ComDev doesn't mind
a non-ComDev-er participating, I'm happy to show up.
--David
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 9:05 AM Bob Paulin wrote:
>
> I'd be willing to help with this as well. I'll be speaking there so
> just let me know how I can be of help.
On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 3:19 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to propose setting up an official ASF swag store. I recently
> came across RedBubble [1] who produce stuff through geographically
> distributed agents so the post costs remain reasonable world-wide.
>
Have
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Raphael Bircher
wrote:
> Hi Bertrand
>
> Am .01.2017, 15:03 Uhr, schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz
> :
>
>> Hi Raphael,
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Raphael Bircher
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
> Rich Bowen wrote on 11/18/16 11:47 AM:
>> Do we have a place to track tasks/tickets for ComDev? The doc was
>> intended for brainstorming, but I don't think we really want to use it
>> as a long-term todo list.
>
>
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Jan Matèrne (jhm) wrote:
> Why Puppet? The Jenkins stuff is done via Ansible.
> Multiple automatisation tools?
>
The Jenkins stuff that was done in Ansible was done by a volunteer,
who chose to use Ansible because it was something he knew,
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Ross Gardler
wrote:
> This whole process is nonsense
In general I agree - CoCoMo is the worst model for valuation (except
for all of the others)
>
> What is important is what economic value does the code produce. If we look at
> it
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 7:38 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 July 2015 at 22:20, Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed that the new reporter output now contains LDAP in a way
that makes it sound
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Ross Gardler ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
Thanks Daniel,
Sharing admin account with ComDev PMC makes sense.
By delegating read/write access to the new repos do you mean the ComDev
owned admin account will assign individual project admin rights to the
://community.apache.org/apache-extras/faq.html
Ross
-Original Message-
From: David Nalley [mailto:ke4...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 9:09 AM
To: Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
Cc: Jim Jagielski
Subject: Re: Apache Extras, Google Code and Sourceforge
So dropping the SF
The Solaris zone has been deprecated (but still works), but please
don't use that. (Not that you could use docker with it anyway)
INFRA-8771 is tracking the new VM for use by ComDev, though I suspect
there are actually several comdev VMs (projects-new for instance runs
on a new VM)
--David
On
None that I am aware of.
A number of projects are using Travis, showing the results of that
doesn't seem to be obviously problematic.
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
is anybody aware of any (legal) problems if projects use services like
Travis
It is my understanding that moving to SF from Google Code is a ComDev
decision. I have interacted with SF and then brought the PoCs they've
done here, but AFAIK, no decision has been made.
--David
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
there is confusion over who owns the decision. Happy for it to be
ComDev if you are happy from infra perspective.
Ross
Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
-Original Message-
From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us javascript:;]
Sent: Thursday
SSL
Specifically - apache.org sites are in https-everywhere. Those sites
can't provide SSL.
None of the current TLP web sites are being served from Apache
hardware though - it's all VMs in 2-3 different cloud providers.
--David
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Mike Kienenberger
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
Who said we allow it for engineers? My position is the same for any
community member no matter what they do.
It is all
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 10:35 AM, anto...@gmx.de wrote:
Could the ASF not simply run a GitHub Enterprise server ?
No, but for varying reasons.
We've discussed GH Enterprise server, and one of the licensing points
is that you can't expose GH Enterprise Server publicly. Even in our
discussions
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 10:24 PM, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote:
Opening a new thread...
Git without Github is like sex without a partner, sufficient but not very
satisfactory. Github option has been explored in the past, and due to
various reasons, it was not possible to achieve.
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 4:06 PM, Christopher ctubb...@apache.org wrote:
All,
Has any thought been put into leveraging GitHub pages for project
documentation, static site hosting? A lot of www.apache.org is simple
static content, as are project pages. Since a lot of projects are now using
git,
-essential areas. David Nalley and
I, as part of our budget planning, are working on identifying what is
considered core and what is not. This will help address the confusion and
therefore make it easier for project communities to decide whether they
can use external services.
What we
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 7:34 AM, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
over at the Apache Commons Project, we have a long discussion about our
mailing lists. Are they to noisy? Should they be splitted up into sublists?
Should individual components go TLP?
IMHO Ben McCann summed
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 10:24 AM, jay vyas jayunit100.apa...@gmail.com wrote:
IS the ASF okay with simply doing a one time commit to SVN, of a single
HTML page which forwards to gh-pages?
I am pretty sure there is a brand requirement that the project's web
site is at $foo.a.o -
As for timing, it's now. But if you only have time to show up at the BOF and
share your experience that will be appreciated.
Ahh - My takeaway from the email was that the ask was for organizing a BoF.
What is it that you need help with?
--David
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 8:25 PM, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote:
Great David,
Does it make sense to have the right panel (Staff Picks, top downloads,
etc) be restricted to Apache Extras related projects ? I'll let others
comment on the adds portion of the prototype.
Frankly, I
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Agreed: How we got here is nice; where we are going (and
where we *should* be going) is better :)
Yes!
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Eric Schultz
eschu...@prplfoundation.org wrote:
All,
I'm trying to understand to the Apache Foundation model of voting in the
commit-then-review system. If a project is running on a CTR system and
someone says they dislike a piece of a previous commit, what
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
On 21/05/2014 jan iversen wrote:
It would also be nice to hear a keynote about who are we today, we all
know our own projects, but currently ASF consist of soo many projects
that I think most of us lost track.
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 4:03 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
On 30 April 2014 04:19, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
It's asked for approval on TM@, but AFAIK no approval has been granted.
Meaning they got a denial, or simply no response ? In the latter case I can
understand they cannot
It's asked for approval on TM@, but AFAIK no approval has been granted.
--David
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote:
Are we aware of this event: http://apacheindia.org/
--
Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen
http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
It might be more interesting to skip Cordova altogether. The industry
is full of ferment about CD. If everyone checks their rhetoric at the
door, there could be an interesting conversation about how to mesh the
AM, David Nalley wrote:
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
It might be more interesting to skip Cordova altogether. The industry
is full of ferment about CD. If everyone checks their rhetoric at the
door, there could be an interesting conversation
Hi Megan:
Thanks for the well documented request. As an all-volunteer
organization it will likely take us several days to get you a
meaningful response; but I wanted to at least acknowledge the request.
I appreciate the respect you folks are showing towards the ASF marks.
--David
On Thu, Feb
Copying Megan this time.
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:30 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
Hi Megan:
Thanks for the well documented request. As an all-volunteer
organization it will likely take us several days to get you a
meaningful response; but I wanted to at least acknowledge
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote:
All,
Please have a look at http://tm3.org/cfpreview Community tab.
We currently have 19 talks that have been marked as 'Accept' in the CFP
system, and I would like to fit this content into 18 sessions. I'd like some
35 matches
Mail list logo