Thanks, Rich. I hope others will jump in and improve the use cases,
ideally illustrated with some publicly viewable links or summaries by
people like @Niclas Hedhman and @Ted Dunning
who have helped communities through challenges in
the past.
Phil
On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 6:54 AM Rich Bowen
Thanks, Phil. Patches applied. This is all good stuff.
—
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
> On Feb 12, 2024, at 5:21 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
> Sorry, last message got away from me. The point of the use cases is to get
> a rough consensus of the kinds of things that a Sharpener will work on.
Sorry, last message got away from me. The point of the use cases is to get
a rough consensus of the kinds of things that a Sharpener will work on.
Ideally, these get a) fixed / better organized and b) fleshed out with
useful links, suggestions and scope of engagement statements.
So for example,
OK, I added a brain dump on the use cases. This is in the spirit of "good
ideas, bad code" ;)
Phil
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 2:06 PM Phil Steitz wrote:
> I just added a patch to the readme and to add me to the members list.
> Perfectly OK if the patch is rejected. I can see both sides of this.
I just added a patch to the readme and to add me to the members list.
Perfectly OK if the patch is rejected. I can see both sides of this. I
just want to be very careful not to encourage too much private discussion
and "community adjustment" happening without visibility or input of
community
> On Feb 12, 2024, at 10:57 AM, tison wrote:
>
> Thank you for starting this discussion, Rich.
>
> I'm trying to get the points of this WG:
>
> 1. This WG is NOT a new office to "shepherd" TLPs, but to write down
> how any community member can help in sharpening an ASF project.
> 2. For
Thank you for starting this discussion, Rich.
I'm trying to get the points of this WG:
1. This WG is NOT a new office to "shepherd" TLPs, but to write down
how any community member can help in sharpening an ASF project.
2. For applying any suggestions, the request is delegated to the
Board,
—
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
> On Feb 11, 2024, at 6:04 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
> I am working on a PR to take a stab at tweaking the wording. I am also
> playing with some ideas around use cases - kinds of things sharpeners will
> work on. I think it's really a good idea to get some
On Sat, Feb 10, 2024 at 7:07 AM Rich Bowen wrote:
> Yes that's probably a good improvement. My one concern is that one
> shouldn't have to be a technical expert in the project to do this work, so
> careful wording is necessary.
>
Agreed on the no need to be an expert on the code, but they will
Yes that's probably a good improvement. My one concern is that one
shouldn't have to be a technical expert in the project to do this work, so
careful wording is necessary.
Rich
On Fri, Feb 9, 2024, 20:49 Phil Steitz wrote:
> Thanks, Rich. I think we have been headed in this direction for some
Thanks, Rich. I think we have been headed in this direction for some time
now and something like this is needed. Many thanks for coming up with a
concrete proposal.
I have one suggestion for improvement, which is in part a problem
statement. Instead of just subscribing to the private@ list, I
> On Feb 9, 2024, at 11:33 AM, Christofer Dutz
> wrote:
>
> Hi Rich,
>
> I love every line of it … the only thing I would possibly “fine tune” in the
> text, would be to be a bit more explicit:
> “You must not already be a member of the PMC.” -> “You must not already be a
> member of the
lks
Datum: Freitag, 9. Februar 2024 um 17:02
An: dev@community.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [WG: Sharpeners] Proposed - Sharpeners
This is another great idea.
You mentioned objections along the lines of "who are you to tell me what to
do?" Most volunteers do better with some direction, rather th
This is another great idea.
You mentioned objections along the lines of "who are you to tell me what to
do?" Most volunteers do better with some direction, rather than being told
"just submit a PR" or "just contribute." Most volunteers, especially new
volunteers such as myself, find that lack
> On Feb 9, 2024, at 10:18 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>
> I like this proposal a lot, and would be happy to sharpen some pencil
> mahogany cases, if allowed (unless this pun was so bad you have to decline my
> offer).
>
> I do have one question, which is where this ... report bit
> would go,
On 2/9/24 14:54, Rich Bowen wrote:
Ok, this one probably requires a LOT of discussion, but it’s something I’ve
been thinking about for more than a year, so if some of this seems like I’ve
already wordsmithed it, that’s why.
Projects go through the Incubator, learn how to Apache, and then they
Ok, this one probably requires a LOT of discussion, but it’s something I’ve
been thinking about for more than a year, so if some of this seems like I’ve
already wordsmithed it, that’s why.
Projects go through the Incubator, learn how to Apache, and then they move on.
The membership changes.
17 matches
Mail list logo
