Hi Rich
That's a fair comment.
We can also take the example of Livy that we were able to "restart"
thanks to new contributors.
Call For Action can also work (as we did for a few projects),
especially when the project is in use.
Regards
JB
On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 2:35 PM Rich Bowen wrote:
>
>
Thanks, folks.
I’ve opened a PR with the feedback from this thread -
https://github.com/apache/comdev-site/pull/174 - and would appreciate a review,
and if you think it passes muster, a merge. Thanks.
> On Mar 29, 2024, at 9:35 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> This week, I’ve been approached by
A common mistake for leveraging the power of community is to make
it complicated ”what is suitable for newcomers". Working in many OSS
projects, I practice and encourage other maintainers to practice: Do not
think "community" as an external resource and you need to feed them. We're
part of the
> * Roadmap -
> a sense of new things that they could help build
> a sense the project is still going someplace
+1 This is what I advise the StreamPark podling every time I meet its
"original author". He shares the challenges that he "cannot find many peers
to collaborate with."
I told him,
Rich Bowen wrote on 3/29/24 9:35 AM:
This week, I’ve been approached by someone concerned about one of our projects,
and looking for a “how to get back on track” document, with concrete,
actionable steps that a project can take when it is struggling to find
contributors. This seems like a
This is why we emphasize community over code. And Kvrocks can be a valuable
example that although quite a few of its "original authors" faded away due
to many reasons, we keep invite new members and due to its product value (a
well-known software's alternative, named Redis), so it can be
I can share two examples:
* Livy podling. Users take over the community.
* Ambari. Vendors/Individual Devs revived the community.
But both of them don't seem to be quite active (again).
Best,
tison.
Michael Sokolov 于2024年3月29日周五 22:21写道：
> I guess it depends on what the problem with the
On Mar 29, 2024, at 10:20 AM, Michael Sokolov wrote:
>
> I guess it depends on what the problem with the project is. It seems
> implicit in your ideas that the project has lost momentum; nobody is
> contributing to it or maintaining it actively? But I just want to
> point out there can be other
I guess it depends on what the problem with the project is. It seems
implicit in your ideas that the project has lost momentum; nobody is
contributing to it or maintaining it actively? But I just want to
point out there can be other problems that might need correction with
different solutions (too
