On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Gregory Chase gch...@pivotal.io wrote:
Does ...based on Apache Hadoop require a clear dependency notation as to
which versions of Apache component releases are part of the commercial
distribution?
No, it cannot. Trademark law is not a matter of such
Send from Lenovo A368t.
good ,if you are a human ,nice to meet you
Ross Gardler ross.gard...@microsoft.com编写：
Asking on the PostgreSQL list is likely the best approach since its one
prohect/list to our many.
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Roman
Does ...based on Apache Hadoop require a clear dependency notation as to
which versions of Apache component releases are part of the commercial
distribution?
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 5:39 AM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 7:53 AM, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org
Bill,
So I can release Niclas Hadoop platform, based on Apache Hadoop ?? I
thought the discussion a few years ago was that this was misleading...
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 12:30 PM, William A Rowe Jr wr...@rowe-clan.net
wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 7:50 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 7:53 AM, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote:
Bill,
So I can release Niclas Hadoop platform, based on Apache Hadoop ?? I
thought the discussion a few years ago was that this was misleading...
Things in law are rarely binary except at the edges or after an actual
On Aug 7, 2015 3:20 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Gregory Chase gch...@pivotal.io wrote:
Does ...based on Apache Hadoop require a clear dependency notation as
to
which versions of Apache component releases are part of the commercial
