On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 6:23 PM Shane Curcuru wrote:
>
> Kevin A. McGrail wrote on 3/21/19 8:57 PM:
> > Anyone know where the source for this is at so I can print some for the
> > roadshow?
>
> Last updated 2017, but it is a trifold brochure layout:
>
>
On 3/21/2019 9:13 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
> Kevin A. McGrail wrote on 3/21/19 8:57 PM:
>> Anyone know where the source for this is at so I can print some for the
>> roadshow?
> Last updated 2017, but it is a trifold brochure layout:
>
>
Kevin A. McGrail wrote on 3/21/19 8:57 PM:
> Anyone know where the source for this is at so I can print some for the
> roadshow?
Last updated 2017, but it is a trifold brochure layout:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/comdev/marketing/brochure/
--
- Shane
Director & Member
The Apache
Anyone know where the source for this is at so I can print some for the
roadshow?
Regards,
KAM
--
Kevin A. McGrail
Member, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171
A few more hits on 'meritoc' since we use "meritocratic" some places.
On 3/21/19 1:53 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> FWIW:
>
> [rbowen@sasha:comdev/site]$ grep -ri meritocracy | wc -l
> 4
>
> So, that one's easy ...
>
>
> [rbowen@sasha:apache/www-site]$ grep -ri meritocracy ./ | wc -l
> 150
>
>
On 3/21/19 1:15 PM, Naomi Slater wrote:
>
> I feel like this is a good opportunity to bring up (as I have brought up
> before) the fact that "meritocracy" was invented for the purposes of a
> satirical *dystopian* novel.
Well, maybe. I kind of find that entire line of conversation to be just
On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 at 17:04, Rich Bowen wrote:
> As alluded to, I am aware of people in our community who believe that we
> have achieved this goal, and that any inference to the contrary is
> crazy-making. I explicitly disagree with that stance. We have clearly
> *not* achieved this goal, and
On 3/21/19 10:51 AM, Naomi Slater wrote:
> "I'm not aware of anybody (ok, fine, I am aware of one person) that thinks
> that Apache has arrived at meritocratic ideals. Rather, we strive towards
> them."
>
> that's not how we communicate it at all, in my view. here's an ASF blog
> post from
"It appears to state that because we haven't yet achieved equity, we
shouldn't bother striving for it"
is this in relation to the first article or the second? either way, it's
not what I'm suggesting
I'm not too sure how to answer your question without repeating what is said
in the article. but
Thanks for these links to interesting reading. These are topics I care
deeply about. I'd be very interested in related analyses around specific
forms or instances of open source governance.
Kenn
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 6:21 AM Rich Bowen wrote:
> I read the article last week when it was doing
I read the article last week when it was doing the rounds, and I must
admit I find it confusing. It appears to state that because we haven't
yet achieved equity, we shouldn't bother striving for it. This seems
false and harmful.
I'm not aware of anybody (ok, fine, I am aware of one person) that
don't wanna spam the list. but here's a bit of serendipity. another piece
crossed my newsfeed today
https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2018/8/21/17687402/kylie-jenner-luck-human-life-moral-privilege
this one is a longer read. but perhaps interesting for this list's
subscribers, because
this article crossed my news feed today:
https://www.fastcompany.com/40510522/meritocracy-doesnt-exist-and-believing-it-does-is-bad-for-you
here's a key takeaway:
> [...] in companies that explicitly held meritocracy as a core value,
managers assigned greater rewards to male employees over
13 matches
Mail list logo
