Really, I don't even know what they are talking about...
Has anyone been informed about what they are trying to achieve?
What "significant push back from Legal and the Board" should we expect?
Regards,
Matthias
Am 16.10.20 um 20:59 schrieb Joan Touzet:
> Hi Jarek,
>
> On 16/10/2020 05:45,
Hi Jarek,
On 16/10/2020 05:45, Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> Joan - I hope you are back and we can continue the discussion.
Sorry, I just don't have the time or the energy to carry this further.
I only brought up OO because it was one of the outliers, and the first
"user application" that came to
Let’s keep this simple.
Focus on your needs for clarification for Helm Charts.
I really don’t have the time or inclination to parse out what troubles there
are for OpenOffice in your plan. I already have a long list with unexpected
issues and mandates.
The Foundation exists for its Project
I do not want to make any assumptions on Windows/MacOS etc - for me this is
really just proposal to clarify the ASF policies which (as far as at
least I understand) are not up-to-date with some distribution mechanisms
for convenience packages that have become popular way that our users can
Questions related to OpenOffice must be discussed with the OpenOffice PMC. Joan
is an observer and I don’t recall her asking the PMC.
Please don’t make any assumptions about builds for Windows, macOS (we support
10.7 and newer) and Linux. Community members on their own build OS/2 and
FreeBSD
Hello everyone,
As Apache Airflow 2.0 alpha is out, I have some time to come back to the
discussion. I also add Joan who was discussing the policy in a
separate thread in the builds@ devlist:
