Hi ComDev,
I am a PhD student from the Univesity of São Paulo, Brazil. I've been
studying the range of outcomes of programs such as GSoC.
So far, we have created a model of what motivates students to enter GSoC,
considering both students and mentors perception.
Our next task involves
Ok, skip it then. However, I'm concerned that what we don't measure, we
don't know how to improve.
On Dec 6, 2016 3:36 AM, "Ulrich Stärk" wrote:
> On 05.12.16 22:24, Rich Bowen wrote:
> > So ... stepping back a bit here. Are you saying that even attempting to
> > measure
On 05.12.16 22:24, Rich Bowen wrote:
> So ... stepping back a bit here. Are you saying that even attempting to
> measure outcomes is harmful, because we might draw the wrong conclusions?
>
> This is a completely new notion to me.
>
> You say:
>
> "I am reluctant to simply collect some data
I think I agree with both of you...
On 12/05/2016 09:41 PM, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
I have seen way too many metrics being misused to justify the wrong actions
...measuring the wrong thing at the wrong time or in the wrong way can
be *extremely* harmful, yes...
On 12/05/2016 01:07 PM, Daniel
So ... stepping back a bit here. Are you saying that even attempting to
measure outcomes is harmful, because we might draw the wrong conclusions?
This is a completely new notion to me.
You say:
"I am reluctant to simply collect some data because I am missing a clear
question what we are trying
On 05.12.16 17:54, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
>
> On 12/05/2016 07:41 AM, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
>>> Or, at the very least, can we make a commitment to track this data going
forward?
>> Let me play the devil's advocate here: What for?
>>
>> GSoC is completely free for the ASF (on the contrary, we
On 12/05/2016 09:41 PM, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
> On 05.12.16 17:45, Rich Bowen wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 12/05/2016 07:41 AM, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
Or, at the very least, can we make a commitment to track this data going
> forward?
>>> Let me play the devil's advocate here: What for?
>>>
>>> GSoC is
So, since this thread seems to have been perceived as "justify your
existence, you layabouts!" let me rephrase, in the hopes of being a
little more constructive. Apologies to any who took my question as an
attack or accusation. It was neither.
Do we have a comprehensive list of project/particpant
On 12/05/2016 01:08 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
> On 5 December 2016 at 17:07, Jacob Champion wrote:
>> Perhaps a bit off-topic for this thread in particular, but in all
>> seriousness, I like this idea a lot. As you've noted, older projects and
>> established
On 5 December 2016 at 17:07, Jacob Champion wrote:
> Perhaps a bit off-topic for this thread in particular, but in all
> seriousness, I like this idea a lot. As you've noted, older projects and
> established developers don't always know which parts of their projects need
>
On 12/05/2016 08:59 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> I disagree with the need for comdev to have a strategy.
I'd like to respond to just this remark.
ComDev has a goal. It is stated in the resolution that created the PMC.
That goal is:
to establish a Project Management Committee charged with
Yes, this would be hugely helpful.
This page - http://community.apache.org/gsoc- should be inward-facing as
well as outward facing. It should tell projects what they should expect
to spend (time, effort, not necessarily money) and what the benefits are
likely to be.
If that's anecdotal, great.
Why not Zoidberg?
If someone wants to gather stats, that's great - if someone wants to
gather stories etc, that is also great. One doesn't exclude the other,
and considering we have nothing at the moment, anything is a step up.
With regards,
Daniel
On 12/05/2016 06:18 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
IMO, rather than gathering statistics, it would be better to gather
stories, tips and advice. It doesn't seem to me that statistics would be
helpful, folks just need to know that it can have great benefits or great
cost and some ideas of the reasons why. Even if it hasn't been helpful in
the
On 12/05/2016 08:15 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
Perhaps ComDev can act like a prpject visitor. (Not auditor or inspector!)
"No one expects the ComDev Inquisition!!"
We can make a wiki page with a randomised list of all ASF projects, a quick
checklist (smaller than maturity model) and just
Hi Rich,
Do you prefer to see cumulative statistics or PMC wise? With a small effort, I
can get detailed statistics from Apache Airavata. GSoC has been great for the
project and is one of the primary sources to induct fresh blood. We have a
decent retention rate, students have stayed around,
Nobody is suggesting we have a 10 year plan with milestones and
deliverables. I'm suggesting that when we do something under the heading
of "community development" we have an obligation to make some attempt to
measure it to determine if it actually moves us in that direction.
Nobody is saying
On 12/05/2016 07:41 AM, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
>> Or, at the very least, can we make a commitment to track this data going
>> > forward?
> Let me play the devil's advocate here: What for?
>
> GSoC is completely free for the ASF (on the contrary, we even get a small
> amount for every accepted
>
On 12/05/2016 07:37 AM, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
> What money are we putting into this?
I have no idea. That would be part of the data that I, as a member,
would really like to know.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Uli
>
> On 03.12.16 23:16, Rich Bowen wrote:
>> So, this question was asked several weeks ago,
On 12/05/2016 07:41 AM, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
>> Or, at the very least, can we make a commitment to track this data going
>> > forward?
> Let me play the devil's advocate here: What for?
>
> GSoC is completely free for the ASF (on the contrary, we even get a small
> amount for every accepted
>
Perhaps something for ComDev is to work on engagement with software
developers who don't currently consider themselves part of any ASF
community, but use our software without contributing (much) back.
These are generally more experienced than GSOC students, and while they
won't have as much
I think GSOC is very valuable, both for the students and the ASF projects
that participate.
Even if a student does not hang around after GSOC (were they made
committer?) it is still good for communities to get fresh drive and ideas,
and ask questions which established committers might not have
On 12/05/2016 03:46 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
> Ulrich Stärk wrote on 12/5/16 9:27 AM:
>> On 05.12.16 14:30, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>>> On 12/05/2016 01:41 PM, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
> ...snip...
>>> But this goes beyond GSoC in my mind. We should be looking at ALL ComDev
>>> projects and evaluate what
Ulrich Stärk wrote on 12/5/16 9:27 AM:
> On 05.12.16 14:30, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>> On 12/05/2016 01:41 PM, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
...snip...
>> But this goes beyond GSoC in my mind. We should be looking at ALL ComDev
>> projects and evaluate what we want to keep, what isn't working, and what
>> needs
On 05.12.16 14:30, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> On 12/05/2016 01:41 PM, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
>> On 03.12.16 23:16, Rich Bowen wrote:
>>> So, this question was asked several weeks ago, and, so far, we have no
>>> statistics. I wonder if, now that there appears to be some interest
>>> around GSoC 2017
On 12/05/2016 02:59 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>> ...The task of ComDev is developing community. If we don't have any data or
>> interest in acquiring such to show that this is in fact helping towards
>>
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> ...The task of ComDev is developing community. If we don't have any data or
> interest in acquiring such to show that this is in fact helping towards
> that, then we should consider whether the current strategy is
On 12/05/2016 01:41 PM, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
> On 03.12.16 23:16, Rich Bowen wrote:
>> So, this question was asked several weeks ago, and, so far, we have no
>> statistics. I wonder if, now that there appears to be some interest
>> around GSoC 2017 starting up, someone could look back at their
On 03.12.16 23:16, Rich Bowen wrote:
> So, this question was asked several weeks ago, and, so far, we have no
> statistics. I wonder if, now that there appears to be some interest
> around GSoC 2017 starting up, someone could look back at their notes and
> answer some of these questions.
>
>
What money are we putting into this?
Cheers,
Uli
On 03.12.16 23:16, Rich Bowen wrote:
> So, this question was asked several weeks ago, and, so far, we have no
> statistics. I wonder if, now that there appears to be some interest
> around GSoC 2017 starting up, someone could look back at their
So, this question was asked several weeks ago, and, so far, we have no
statistics. I wonder if, now that there appears to be some interest
around GSoC 2017 starting up, someone could look back at their notes and
answer some of these questions.
While it's cool that folks are spending time on GSoC,
Yes, that was the very case for us in Taverna, where two students got
engaged because of GSOC advertising, even if they didn't participate in the
GSOC programme (we lacked mentor capacity), so they co-mentored each other
instead. Both are now committers.
Related SSI blog post, "Downloading
Also there may be students who have who actually did not take in part in
GSOC for Apache, but got involved with Apache because of GSOC ,and still
stick around.
On 16 November 2016 at 15:48, Nick Burch wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Nov 2016, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
>> It would be great to
On Wed, 16 Nov 2016, Rich Bowen wrote:
It would be great to have some kind of statistics on how GSoC helps
projects longer term. Do students stick around? Does the code written
actually get incorporated into releases? Does it in fact contribute to
the mission of Community Development, or is it
It would be great to have some kind of statistics on how GSoC helps
projects longer term. Do students stick around? Does the code written
actually get incorporated into releases? Does it in fact contribute to
the mission of Community Development, or is it just a nice summer job
for these students?
35 matches
Mail list logo