Re: Installer is Timing Out.

2018-06-11 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
Rawgit might be a good option for us: https://rawgit.com/ If no one has objections, I can set this up. Thanks, Om On Mon, Jun 11, 2018, 5:12 PM Alex Harui wrote: > Also, I think if we can find a volunteer to host the entire binary folder > (and thus pay the bandwidth costs) that will solve

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.1 RC3

2018-04-19 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
+1 Binding On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 11:45 AM, Piotr Zarzycki wrote: > +1 (Binding) > > - I was able to build from sources > - Downloading newest version of SDK went well on Mac and Windows > > Thanks, > Piotr > > 2018-04-19 16:05 GMT+02:00 Fréderic Cox

Re: [Discuss] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.1 RC2*

2018-04-19 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
Alex, Justin, Before you go any further into this discussion, please remember that technically we don't even need to release the source for this. No one is going to download the source artifacts for the Installer. The Installer is a convenience application we provide to our users so that they

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.1 RC2

2018-04-18 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
+1 Binding On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 3:39 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > +1 > > Although I wish we had updated the RELEASE_NOTES. > > -Alex > > On 4/17/18, 12:01 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote: > > > Alex, > > > >I've answered you in discussion thread. >

Re: [Discuss] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.1 RC2*

2018-04-17 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
I was able to install the app fine. The SDK was downloaded fine as well, but it looks like Adobe AIR took a very long time to load. Thanks, Om On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 12:14 PM, alexp wrote: > I have had Flash Builder, Flash Professional, Animate 2015 and Animate >

Re: [Discuss] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.1 RC1*

2018-04-17 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
uild, but I see > that those for Windows are not the right one. Sorry about that. I will cut > another RC! :/ > > Thanks, > Piotr > > 2018-04-17 8:04 GMT+02:00 OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com>: > > > Piotr, > > > > I just tried this on Windows

Re: [Discuss] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.1 RC1*

2018-04-17 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
Piotr, I just tried this on Windows and I am getting the same error: The application cannot be installed due to a certificate problem. The > certificate does not match the installed application certificate, does not > support application upgrades, or is invalid. Please contact the >

Re: [DRAFT] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.0 Released

2017-11-23 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
, 2017 at 11:47 PM, Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote: > Om, > > Thanks for explanation. I sent you certificates. > > Piotr > > 2017-11-23 8:16 GMT+01:00 OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com>: > > > On Nov 22, 2017 10:13 PM, "

Re: [DRAFT] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.0 Released

2017-11-22 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
manually install the certificate, then the OS can verify the signature of the Installer binary. In our case, there is a good chance that our certificate has expired. Can you send it to me privately so I can try to check its validity? Thanks, Om Thanks, Piotr 2017-11-22 23:13 GMT+01:00 OmP

Re: [DRAFT] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.0 Released

2017-11-22 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
ation. > > Piotr > > > Have you checked the previous releases? > > 2017-11-22 23:02 GMT+01:00 OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com>: > > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 12:51 PM, piotrz <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Guys,

Re: [DRAFT] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.0 Released

2017-11-22 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 12:51 PM, piotrz wrote: > Guys, > > Something is totally wrong. I just installed Installer 3.2 and check > whether > it has digital sign and it's not. For the comparison I've checked "Adobe > Extension Manager CS6" and properties looks like

Re: [DRAFT] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.0 Released

2017-11-22 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote: > In my experience, SWFs never recompile and match. I think there is a > time-stamp in the SWF. > > -Alex > > On 11/22/17, 10:15 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash > Muppirala" <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of

Re: [DRAFT] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.0 Released

2017-11-22 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Nov 22, 2017 9:54 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: I followed those directions as well, but I wonder if one of us made a mistake somewhere and we just didn't notice. I'm not sure how to verify what certificate was used. Maybe Om knows. One way I can think of is to re

Re: [DRAFT] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.0 Released

2017-11-22 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Nov 22, 2017 9:18 AM, "piotrz" wrote: Hi Alex, I tested it before and just tried again. 1) I have installed 3.2 version 2) Try install 3.3 version and got this error Piotr

Re: [DRAFT] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.0 Released

2017-11-19 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
Piotr, I can confirm that Installer 3.3 can successfully download the Flex SDK 4.16.1 with Air 27. This is on Windows 10. Great job!! Thanks, Om On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 6:32 AM, Piotr Zarzycki wrote: > Hi Zach, > > Unfortunately during work on that issue I have

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC1*

2017-11-14 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 7:50 PM, Par Niclas Hedhman wrote: > > Alex, > it is called "Open SOURCE" and not "Binary with link to Source" for a > reason. Apache Software Foundation official only promise SOURCE releases. > Any convenience binaries are not required/expected. It is

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC1

2017-11-10 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
+0 I checked the signature, rat report, etc. everything looks good. But when I try to build the source package, for some reason ant cannot download the osmf.swc. Although, I can simply curl the url without any issues: ===

Re: [Discuss] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3 - RC1*

2017-11-07 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
Testing on Windows 10. I am seeing this error: Installer version 3.3.0 (windows) Using Locale: en_US Fetched the SDK download mirror URL from the CGI. SDK version Apache Flex SDK 4.16.0 AIR version 23.0 Flash Player version 23.0 Creating Apache Flex home Creating temporary directory Downloading

Re: [Discuss] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3 - RC1

2017-11-06 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
Piotr, sorry for the annoyance, but in Gmail, these two threads show up merged. In the past, we usually add a few extra characters like *** to force separate threads. Otherwise this will quickly lead to confusion :-) Thanks, Om On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Piotr Zarzycki

Re: [Discuss] Release Apache Flex and Apache Flex Installer

2017-10-27 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
+1 please go ahead. I can help testing. I think the process for the Installer release are a bit looser. You can start the VOTE thread as soon as possible. Especially since this issue has been around for a while. Thanks, Om On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Piotr Zarzycki

Re: Royale is now an Apache Project

2017-09-24 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
help' which is nothing but a repo for holding Issues. Thanks, Om > > Harbs > > > On Sep 24, 2017, at 8:57 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Let's just use Github Issues, please. > > One place for everything. This makes it

Re: Royale is now an Apache Project

2017-09-23 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
th'd for GH but didn't send the 2nd > >> factor auth. > >> > >> I logged out of GitHub and did something else for a while. Then when I > >> tried again, it asked for the 2nd factor and then the MFA box said > >> "write-access granted" and now I thi

Re: Royale website and domain registration

2017-09-22 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
t will have to redirect to > >royale.apache.org, so I don't think you have to wait. It would be nice > to > >have that domain no matter what. > > > >-Alex > > > >On 9/22/17, 2:57 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" > ><omu

Re: Royale website and domain registration

2017-09-22 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Sep 22, 2017 2:22 PM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: How about I grab 'royalesdk.org' and we take it from there? EdB +1 On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 7:56 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > Hi Carlos, > > I agree that is a game we should not play. Even if we can

Re: Royale website and domain registration

2017-09-22 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
I vote for royale.io. I can put in at least $100 towards the purchase of the domain. Others are free to chip in as much as they would like. Thanks, Om On Sep 22, 2017 8:35 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > AIUI, royale.io is owned by a squatter and the price STARTS at $199.

Re: Royale is now an Apache Project

2017-09-21 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
do that, it should take up to 30 minutes for the sync to happen. It took a while for me after I added the 2FA in Github. Thanks, Om > -Alex > > On 9/21/17, 12:00 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" > <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.co

Re: Royale is now an Apache Project

2017-09-21 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
LID> > >>wrote: > >> > >> OK, I have asked for > >> royale-asjs > >> royale-tourjs > >> royale-typedefs > >> royale-compiler > >> > >> I will request Git website instead of SVN. > >> > >> I

Re: Royale is now an Apache Project

2017-09-21 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
display/FLEX/ [2] https://github.com/ok-at-github/flexjs-docs/wiki [3] https://pages.github.com/ Thanks, Piotr Okay, in that case we might need to explicitly ask for Github wiki and Github pages in our request to Infra Thanks, Om 2017-09-21 19:01 GMT+02:00 OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...

Re: Royale is now an Apache Project

2017-09-21 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
have asked for > >royale-asjs > >royale-tourjs > >royale-typedefs > >royale-compiler > > > > I will request Git website instead of SVN. > > > > I will not request a wiki at this time. > > > > Thanks, > > -Alex > > >

Re: Royale is now an Apache Project

2017-09-21 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
s time. > Do you mean confluence wiki or github wiki? I think we need to explicitly ask for github wiki. Thanks, Om > > Thanks, > -Alex > > On 9/21/17, 9:26 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" > <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gm

Re: Royale is now an Apache Project

2017-09-21 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
Github has a wiki feature. Although I haven't seen any other Apache project use it. I hope we can use it as part of the Gitbox workflow. The good thing is that this would make it easier for anyone to add stuff onto the wiki without having deal with confluence, karma etc. Thanks, Om On Sep 21,

Re: [DISCUSS] Building the brand for Royale

2017-09-20 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
I would stay away from WordPress just because of all the security issues and maintenance required. Github pages should be a better place. Thanks, Om On Sep 20, 2017 10:26 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > Hmm. > > I think if we grab a domain and donate it to the ASF, that it

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

2017-09-19 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
think of three ways* to pronounce "bo-ja" without even resorting > >> to a > >>>> South African "click" language. This makes it a challenge to refer to > >> the > >>>> product to anyone who does not already use it. > >>>

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

2017-09-19 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
> > >> > > >> > > "Braid" also brings to mind "Helix". I haven't looked to see if there >> are >> > > any projects that use "Helix" which I'm sure there are. And if so, >> maybe >> > > "Felix" to give a nod back to Flex along with the helix. >> > > >> > > —peter >> > I love Helix. It actually

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

2017-09-19 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
gt; > > >>>> Ick… > > >>>> > > >>>> Why do these things have to be so complicated? ;-) > > >>>> > > >>>> Harbs > > >>>> > > >>>>> On Sep 19, 2017, at 8:58 PM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net> > >

Re: [DISCUSS] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

2017-09-19 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
t;> > >> Carlos, will you help with a new website regardless of which name is > >> chosen or only if it is Royale (or Crown)? > >> > >> Is anybody adamantly against Beads, Boja or Limber? After reading this > >> mornings posts, I'm leaning away from l

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

2017-09-19 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
Boja is one name I really dislike. Sorry Piotr Also I dont know how to pronounce it. Is it Bo-ha, or boo-ha or bo-ja, etc? On Sep 19, 2017 10:09 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote: > Reading Alex in VOTE thread and how many times we are mentioning Boja - I > will change my

Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

2017-09-18 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
Abstain (binding) On Sep 18, 2017 10:47 AM, "Dave Fisher" wrote: > I am abstaining for now. > > > On Sep 17, 2017, at 3:19 PM, Piotr Zarzycki > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > In this thread I've gathered list of names proposition for fork of FlexJS

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

2017-09-17 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
One point of clarification. The Beads concept comes into play only in the FlexJS SDK and not in the Flex Falcon or FalconJX compiler. Some day it could be FalconWebAssemby or FalconIOS. Naming the Apache project as Beads means that we are highlighting only the SDK and not the cross-compilers.

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

2017-09-16 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
project name. > > > > If anyone wants to push for a name other than Royale, please reply to > this > > post with that name. Then we can decide whether we need to use STeVe or > > not. > > > > Thanks, > > -Alex > > > > On 9/15/17, 9:49 AM, &q

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

2017-09-15 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Piotr Zarzycki wrote: > Definitely the were the most support for Royale. +1 for starting vote > YES/NO. We could express in the VOTE thread that anyone can shot his own > name idea and others can give him +1. > There were several

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

2017-09-15 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Sep 15, 2017 8:37 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: It is funny, but actually, as we we've been thinking about adding suffixes for target runtimes like Bend -> BendJS, it did occur to me that we would have a problem if someone created a runtime we wanted to target called

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

2017-09-14 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
In my view, the biggest reason for a fork is to get away from the name Flex. In terms of familiarity, show a few lines of MXML code to current Flex developers, they will immediately recognize it. The same way that I recognize JQuery if I see the $ symbol or AngularJS when I see ng-something. My

Re: [VOTE] Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?

2017-09-14 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
No (binding) On Sep 14, 2017 8:37 AM, "Dave Fisher" wrote: VOTE Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS? [ ] Yes - The forked project should be Apache FlexJS. [ ] No - The forked project should have another name which will be discussed. [ ] Abstain - Don’t

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

2017-09-13 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
We could always structure the VOTE like this: 1. Royale 2. XXX 3. YYY 4. FlexJS One vote should answer both questions. Thanks, Om On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Piotr Zarzycki wrote: > On the other hand, we have rather majority of voices for do not change the

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

2017-09-13 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
ill get confused. Unless we market it as Apache Bend. Is that what you mean? Thanks, Om > > Thanks, > -Alex > > On 9/13/17, 10:57 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" > <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >On Sep

RE: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

2017-09-13 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Sep 13, 2017 9:39 AM, "Yishay Weiss" wrote: My main concern was with the JS suffix. If we can create new products without the JS suffix that’s fine with me. On the other hand, if Carlos or someone else feels passionate about a name change and volunteers to deal with

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

2017-09-12 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
I prefer a name change away from FlexJS. I would like to concentrate more on getting new developers to the fold as opposed concentrating on existing Flex developers. The term FlexXX has a dated feel to it. Maybe a new name will get folks to check it out at which point they will feel like

Re: [FlexJS][Installer] Future packaging of FlexJS releases

2017-09-07 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
gt; > Hi Alex, > > > > Since you fake airglobal.swc and playerglobal.swc maybe it will also work > > with Moonshine. I will try to do same operation as you did and see > whether > > I will not have previous errors. > > > > Thanks! > > Piotr > > &g

Re: [FlexJS][Installer] Future packaging of FlexJS releases

2017-09-07 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
This is a big big deal. Thanks for getting this done. I would be very interested in the non-installer, simple zip file download. I dont care much for Ant as a requirement, I would rather continue maintaining the npm FlexJS package for AIR download + setup. Thoughts? Thanks, Om On Thu, Sep 7,

FlexJS installation - Installer vs. npm

2017-09-05 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
I am trying to debug a problem with Visual Studio Code integration. The FlexJS 0.8.0 SDK that I installed with `npm install flexjs -g` does not work with VSCode. It fails with this error: Error: Missing builtin type Object (1,1) More details here:

RE: [VOTE] Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

2017-09-01 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
t; -private@ > -dev@ > -commits@ > -users@ > -issues@ > > Version Control > > We would like to use GitBox if it is practical to convert the current git > repos listed above. We want to explore using GitHub's wiki and > documentation tools. > > Issue Tracking >

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

2017-08-31 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
ent from my iPhone > > > On Aug 31, 2017, at 2:25 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Well, Phoenix is already a thing: > > http://phoenixframework.org/ <http://phoenixframework.org/> > > > > Not sure about trademark issues… > > > >&

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

2017-08-31 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
I want to throw in the name FenixJS for the fork. Its a play on the words Flex + Phoenix. You know what that means :-) Thanks, Om

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

2017-08-29 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
e Maven for building the various > > release artifacts. > > > > Cryptography > > > > Apache FlexJS does not currently distribute cryptography code other than > > an MD5 hash algorithm. > > > > Required Resources > > > > Mailing Lists &g

Re: [FlexJS][Docs] Started with some docs using a github repo

2017-08-14 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
Ah, I see that Apache org on Github has disabled wiki pages. Sorry for the noise :-( Thanks, Om On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 11:17 AM, piotrz wrote: > Om, > > What do you mean by check in those doc to flexjs source ? Do you mean > create > in our FlexJS repo [1] similar

Re: [FlexJS][Docs] Started with some docs using a github repo

2017-08-14 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
I think Github is a better way to crowd-source documentation than asking folks to write to a Wiki page. It enables anyone to start working on documentation and then send a PR. That said, Olaf, since you are already a committer, you can simply check in the docs into the flex-asjs git repo and

Re: [FlexJS][Docs] Started with some docs using a github repo

2017-08-13 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
Olaf, I think you should do what you feel comfortable given that you are putting most of the work  That said, if you plan to migrate it to the Apache Flex project at a future point, it will be easier if you add an Apache V2 license to your repo right away. Thanks, Om On Aug 13, 2017 12:17

Re: [MAVEN-BUILD] FlexJS Framework (maven) - Build # 1167 - Fixed

2017-08-03 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
Thanks for taking care of this, Piotr! Regards, Om On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Piotr Zarzycki wrote: > Yes! Finally it's working! > > Chris Lambertus on infra HipChat helped me giving a tip to setup specific > version of Maven in configuration! I setup 3.3.9

Re: Debugger statement

2017-07-31 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
+1 I so used to doing this nowadays. Also, this is very useful when we want to debug Node.js applications. There is no good way to setup debug points the first time with Node.js applications. Thanks, Om On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Josh Tynjala wrote: > If there

Re: Theme for FlexJS

2017-07-28 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
P related issues, please feel free to send me a direct email. P. S. I will be removing us...@flex.apache.org going forward. So those who are interested in this, please subscribe to the dev@flex.apache.org mailing list. Thanks, Om Angelo El vie., 28 jul. 2017 a las 16:42, OmPrakash Muppirala (< b

Theme for FlexJS

2017-07-28 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Jul 28, 2017 7:10 AM, "piotrz" wrote: Om, That would be awesome, cause I will go on vacation next week and have a feeling that will not provide asap some resources at that time if will be required for Angelo and Trevor. If you could look from time to time to this o

Re: Installer Problems

2017-07-04 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 4:43 PM, piotrz wrote: > Do we have some alternative to provide users where we can download by SDK > with all dependencies ? > Yes, it is as simple as: *npm install flexjs -g* Thanks, Om > > > - > Apache Flex PMC >

Re: [DRAFT] Apache FlexJS 0.8.0 and Apache Flex FalconJX 0.8.0 Released

2017-06-27 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
FlexJS 0.8 has been published to npm. Please test using: npm install flexjs -g Thanks, Om On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 10:46 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 8:28 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> > wrote:

Re: [DRAFT] Apache FlexJS 0.8.0 and Apache Flex FalconJX 0.8.0 Released

2017-06-27 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
match how 0.8.0 will > work. > > I will wait until I hear that you have the NPM ready before sending the > announcement. Working on it now. Thanks, Om > I think only Olaf suggested any changes. Anybody else? > > -Alex > > On 6/26/17, 9:27 AM, "omup...@gmai

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache FlexJS 0.8.0 RC2

2017-06-26 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
I tried the installer.xml via ant. It was failing. I was downloading the AIR sdk via the browser when the vote results were announced. In any case, I will give all this a spin when I get release of the npm package out. Thanks, Om On Jun 26, 2017 8:25 PM, "Alex Harui"

Re: [DRAFT] Apache FlexJS 0.8.0 and Apache Flex FalconJX 0.8.0 Released

2017-06-26 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
I will get it done in the next 24 hours. Do we want to wait 3 days to announce so that the mirrors can catch up? Thanks, Om On Jun 26, 2017 8:37 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: Please comment on the draft below. We need Om or someone to publish the npm module. ---

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.8.0 RC2

2017-06-26 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
Gah, I give up. The Adobe AIR SDK download kept failing several times :-( Thanks, Om On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 11:27 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > Vote passed with 4 +1 votes. > > On 6/20/17, 10:55 PM, "piotrz" wrote: > > >Voting again, cause I

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache FlexJS 0.8.0 RC2

2017-06-22 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
I am trying to test the release artifacts, but there is no mention of maven build in the README. Are there instructions somewhere? Thanks, Om On Jun 23, 2017 12:29 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > I wrote this up recently [1]. It would be great if you can give it a try. >

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache FlexJS 0.8.0 RC1

2017-06-09 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
Please note that I will be traveling for the next few days. In any case I will be waiting for the artifacts to be propagated through the mirrors before pushing a FlexJS npm release. Hopefully the timelines will coincide. Worst case, there will be a bit of a lag for the npm release. Thanks, Om

Re: [FlexJS] Removing PasswordInputBead has no effect

2017-06-07 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > HI, > > > "It can't be done in a subclass with > > an override of the strand setter? > > Probably not without altering the original bead which may also be not PAYG. > That wont be breaking PAYG. The basic idea

Re: [FlexJS] Removing PasswordInputBead has no effect

2017-06-07 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
It seems subclass is the way to go here. Anyone disagree with that? Thanks, Om On Jun 7, 2017 1:57 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: > Hi, > > I'm still awaiting answers from Alex and further discussion on what PAYG > is and isn’t and will resolve in accordance to that. > >

Re: [FlexJS] Removing PasswordInputBead has no effect

2017-06-07 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
Justin, Do you now have sufficient info on the PAYG paradigm to resolve this issue? When you re-read Alex and Harbs' suggestions now, does it make sense? I suggest we fix this issue and move on, please. Thanks, Om On Jun 6, 2017 5:22 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: Hi,

Re: [2/2] git commit: [flex-asjs] [refs/heads/release0.8.0] - fix event types for valuechange. Otherwise Binding would break. Events are global and should be compatible for any given event type

2017-06-07 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Jun 6, 2017 10:42 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: On 6/6/17, 10:27 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> I agree that there could be a even smaller bead that doesn't track >>changes >> as you move the thumb. Something to do in the next release,

Re: Beads and DRY (was Re: [FlexJS] Removing PasswordInputBead has no effect)

2017-06-06 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 5:29 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > In FlexJS we have a preference towards utility classes. > > So say we have existing bead A and we want to add some functionality to > to. In order to use utility classes we would need to modify bead A and

Re: Beads and DRY (was Re: [FlexJS] Removing PasswordInputBead has no effect)

2017-06-06 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
In an attempt to simplify the pattern, can we say: Strands = components Beads = functionalities All components dont need all functionalities. We add functionalities to components on a Pay As You Go (PAYG) basis. This is achieved through composition (the classical OOP paradigm) That is, a

Re: [LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.8.0

2017-05-31 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
Josh is right. There is no way to pass command-line args to an install command. What is there right now is the best way to pass args during an npm install. Thanks, Om On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 9:35 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > I should have something in th

Re: [LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.8.0

2017-05-31 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
. Thanks, -Alex On 5/30/17, 7:15 PM, "Josh Tynjala" <joshtynj...@gmail.com> wrote: >I could not find a way to parse extra command line arguments with an npm >install command. If you could figure that out, that would be better! > >- Josh > >On May 30, 2017 6:

Re: [LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.8.0

2017-05-30 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
Awesome! I had this as a TODO. I can at least help with testing this out now. I can also push the bits to the npm registry when we go live with the release. Also, what if we pass them as command line args? Do you mind if I make this change? Thanks, Om On May 30, 2017 11:47 AM, "Josh Tynjala"

Re: [LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.8.0

2017-05-02 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
com> wrote: > Theoretically, the problem goes away after 1.8.0_131. Maybe run with more > verbose output to see if you in fact hitting the same problem. > > -Alex > > On 5/2/17, 2:05 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" > <omup...@gmail.com

Re: [LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.8.0

2017-05-02 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
shipping with that module. Thanks, Om > > -Alex > > On 5/2/17, 9:58 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" > <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >On May 2, 2017 9:43 AM, "Christofer Dutz" &l

Re: [LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.8.0

2017-05-02 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
modules disabled? And add instructions for those who want to enable it? Thanks, Om Chris Am 01.05.17, 21:18 schrieb "omup...@gmail.com im Auftrag von OmPrakash Muppirala" <omup...@gmail.com im Auftrag von bigosma...@gmail.com>: flex-falcon and flex-typedefs built fine

Re: [LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.8.0

2017-05-01 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
flex-falcon and flex-typedefs built fine for me. The flex-asjs build is broken for me on the Fonts project. Here is the relevant log: https://paste.apache.org/kATQ Can someone please take a look? Thanks, Om On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 11:50 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com>

Re: [LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.8.0

2017-05-01 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
For folks who want to help out but are not sure how to, please follow the step by step instructions here on how to build the FlexJS SDK from the sources: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Building+FlexJS+with+Maven Thanks, Om On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Greg Dove

Re: [LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.8.0

2017-04-25 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Apr 25, 2017 9:08 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: On 4/25/17, 7:48 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> Justin, which file(s) are you talking about? What is the problem and >>what >> is your proposed solution? > > >The problem IMO is two fold in we’re

Re: [LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.8.0

2017-04-25 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Apr 25, 2017 3:52 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: Hi, > Adobe would certainly be able to relicense that one and remove the header. Perhaps - but that would most likely depend on the contract Adobe had with Mike Chambers (assuming he's the original author) at the time or

Re: [LAST CALL] Release FlexJS/FalconJX 0.8.0

2017-04-23 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
Justin, you are welcome to contact the original authors and find out more. But please don't expect the release process to wait till we figure this out. We can fix license headers in a subsequent release if needed. I would rather Alex and Harbs continue their coding, prepping for release, etc

Re: git commit: [flex-asjs] [refs/heads/develop] - CORS security. Allow auth credentials to be passed when using cross site calls. This is required as well as setting the Access-Control-Allow-Origin h

2017-04-11 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Apr 10, 2017 11:40 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: IMO, a bead is still best, but your proposed implementation isn't what I would recommend. With beads, we are trying for loose coupling, separation of concerns, abstraction, encapsulation, and a bunch of other Computer Science

Re: [DISCUSS] Changing our general mode of development?

2017-03-28 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
The general approach should be to first merge dev branch into the feature branch and test if any examples are broken. Then ask for volunteers to test the feature branch and report issues. After a reasonable amount of time, the feature branch can ne merged into dev. This will not solve all the

Re: 4.16.0 Windows Install issues (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Flex 4.16.0 released)

2017-03-20 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
We could do a patch release that does not add any new feature for the 64 bit installer binary. We would need to bump up the version so that the auto update functionality would be triggered. In this we probably don't even need a source release as we will only be modifying the convenience

Re: [FlexJS] SVG getBBox

2017-03-20 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
Width and height properties are fine for rectangular shapes. For curves and paths, we need the getBBox () method to get the true extents. I think this call could be moved down the chain and called only when needed, i.e. for curves and non rectangular shapes. Moreover, the promise of the

Re: 4.16.0 Install issues (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Flex 4.16.0 released)

2017-03-16 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
You can use FP/AIR 23 and older then use one of the upgrade scripts. +1 for this approach. I think we should add these steps to a wiki page and keep it handy for folks who want this. In fact, simply copying over a different AIR SDK should work as well. Thanks, Om

Re: [4.16.0] # Apache Flex SDK 4.16.0 nightly build 254: Successful

2017-03-10 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
Has this build been turned off, now that 4.16 is out the door? Thanks, Om On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 4:48 PM, wrote: > flex-sdk_release-candidate - Build #254 - Successful > > Changes since last build: > No changes > > For more information, check the console output at

Re: [FlexJS] MDL - Dynamic Child Problem

2017-02-19 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
Piotr, I ran into this codepen from one of the issues in MDLs github http://codepen.io/anon/pen/BNOVvw Is that what we need to here? Thanks, Om On Feb 19, 2017 7:47 AM, "piotrz" wrote: > Alex, > > Actually this code which I'm showing in the links is something

Re: [FlexJS] Text binding showing undefined

2017-02-16 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > On 2/16/17, 10:37 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira" > > wrote: > > >Hi Alex, > > > >IMHO, this is not PAYG, no body wants

Re: [Flex JS] Label's text gets trimmed

2017-02-16 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
Setting this style in CSS should fix this issue: white-space: pre or white-space: pre-wrap More options here: https://www.w3schools.com/cssref/pr_text_white-space.asp Thanks, Om 2017-02-16 10:39 GMT-08:00 Carlos Rovira : > Hi Justing, I think this is the normal

Re: [FlexJS Summit] Preparing the schedule

2017-02-15 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
It would be nice to have a hackathon session as well. I was able to add support for FontAwesome to FlexJS in around 8 hours total. Maybe we pick a popular JS library and hack away at adding support for that in this session? Thanks, Om On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 1:38 PM, Harbs

Re: [FlexJS, MDL] Layout Problems

2017-02-15 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 12:14 PM, piotrz wrote: > Hi Om, > > But saying using !import you mean do not add it to our library, but as an > developer inside our app ? > Yes, I meant for the user-developer. But a component-developer can chose to add the convenient

Re: [FlexJS, MDL] Layout Problems

2017-02-15 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
As Yishay hinted earlier, we would need to to use !important for display: flex .layout { display: flex !important; } On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 12:06 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have been meaning to add a note asking folks to test out the > Flex

Re: [FlexJS, MDL] Layout Problems

2017-02-15 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
I have been meaning to add a note asking folks to test out the FlexTeamPage_MDL project https://github.com/apache/flex-asjs/tree/develop/examples/flexjs/FlexTeamPage_MDL Wherever I had layout issues, I simply created a container and gave it a className and did all my layout using FlexBox. That

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >