t;>>>> cc @Ron Liu WDYT?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 3. Regarding WindowEmitStrategy, IIUC it is currently unsupported
> >> on
> >>>> TVF
> >>>>>> window, so
> >>>>>> it's recommended
INK-29692[2]. cc @Xuyang
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> https://github.com/ververica/flink-sql-benchmark/blob/master/tools/common/flink-conf.yaml
>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/
:49写道：
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Jane,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thank Jane for driving this proposal !
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This makes sense for users, +1 for that.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best
> > > > > > Hi Jane,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for the proposal. +1 from my side.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > Jark
> > > > > >
> &
rote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Jane,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for driving this effort! And +1 for the proposed changes.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have one comment on the migration plan.
> > >
r options to be moved to another module/package, I think we have
> to
> > > > > mark the old option deprecated in 1.20 for it to be removed in 2.0,
> > > > > according to the API compatibility guarantees[1]. We can introduce
> the
> > > > > new optio
to the API compatibility guarantees[1]. We can introduce the
> > > > new option in 1.20 with the same option key in the intended class.
> > > > WDYT?
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Xuannan
> > > >
> > &g
the intended class.
> > > WDYT?
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Xuannan
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> https://nightlies.apache.org/flink/flink-docs-master/docs/ops/upgrading/#api-compatibility-guarantees
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > https://nightlies.apache.org/flink/flink-docs-master/docs/ops/upgrading/#api-compatibility-guarantees
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 6:20 PM Jane Chan wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I'd like to start a discussi
nan
>
> [1]
> https://nightlies.apache.org/flink/flink-docs-master/docs/ops/upgrading/#api-compatibility-guarantees
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 6:20 PM Jane Chan wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'd like to start a discussion on FLIP-457: Imp
gt;
> I'd like to start a discussion on FLIP-457: Improve Table/SQL Configuration
> for Flink 2.0 [1]. This FLIP revisited all Table/SQL configurations to
> improve user-friendliness and maintainability as Flink moves toward 2.0.
>
> I am looking forward to your feedback.
>
&g
Hi all,
I'd like to start a discussion on FLIP-457: Improve Table/SQL Configuration
for Flink 2.0 [1]. This FLIP revisited all Table/SQL configurations to
improve user-friendliness and maintainability as Flink moves toward 2.0.
I am looking forward to your feedback.
Best regards,
Jane
[1
12 matches
Mail list logo
