Re: [VOTE] Release 1.13.2, release candidate #1

2021-07-13 Thread Till Rohrmann
could cancel > this RC and wait for that problem resolved. > > Best > Yun Tang > > From: Till Rohrmann > Sent: Wednesday, July 7, 2021 17:21 > To: dev > Cc: Xintong Song > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 1.13.2, release candidate #1 > &

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.13.2, release candidate #1

2021-07-07 Thread Yun Tang
To: dev Cc: Xintong Song Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 1.13.2, release candidate #1 I think FLINK-23233 sounds like a very serious problem to me. We either continue releasing 1.13.2 and do an immediate 1.13.3 afterwards or we cancel this RC and fix the problem and then resume the 1.13.2 release

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.13.2, release candidate #1

2021-07-07 Thread Till Rohrmann
I think FLINK-23233 sounds like a very serious problem to me. We either continue releasing 1.13.2 and do an immediate 1.13.3 afterwards or we cancel this RC and fix the problem and then resume the 1.13.2 release. Cheers, Till On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 5:49 AM JING ZHANG wrote: > Thanks Xintong

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.13.2, release candidate #1

2021-07-06 Thread JING ZHANG
Thanks Xintong for bringing the alarm, +1 on Xintong's proposal to hold the vote until deciding what to do with FLINK-23233. BTW, I made a typo in the previous voting. I mean +1 (non-binding) instead of +1 (binding). I'm very sorry for the confusion. +1 (non-binding). 1. Reviewed website pull

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.13.2, release candidate #1

2021-07-06 Thread Xintong Song
Hi everyone, We find a bug that may cause data loss in a rare condition, which IMHO is a release blocker. Please see FLINK-23233 [1] for details. Given that this bug is not newly introduced but already exists in 1.13.0 & 1.13.1 releases, I would not replace my +1 with a -1 immediately. Instead,

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.13.2, release candidate #1

2021-07-06 Thread JING ZHANG
+1 (binding) 1. Reviewed website pull request 2. Built from source code flink-1.13.2-src.tgz succeeded 3. Started a local Flink cluster, ran the WordCount example, WebUI looks good, no suspicious output/log 4.

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.13.2, release candidate #1

2021-07-05 Thread Zakelly Lan
+1 (non-binding) - built from sources - run streaming job of wordcount - web-ui looks good - checkpoint and restore looks good Best, Zakelly On Mon, Jul 5, 2021 at 2:40 PM Jingsong Li wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > - Verified checksums and signatures > - Built from sources > - run table

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.13.2, release candidate #1

2021-07-05 Thread Jingsong Li
+1 (non-binding) - Verified checksums and signatures - Built from sources - run table example jobs - web-ui looks good - sql-client looks good I think we should update the unresolved JIRAs in [1] to 1.13.3. And we should check resolved JIRAs in [2], commits of some are not in the 1.13.2. We

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.13.2, release candidate #1

2021-07-05 Thread Xingbo Huang
+1 (non-binding) - Verified checksums and signatures - Built from sources - Verified Python wheel package contents - Pip install Python wheel package in Mac - Run Python UDF job in Python shell Best, Xingbo Yangze Guo 于2021年7月5日周一 上午11:17写道: > +1 (non-binding) > > - built from sources > - run

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.13.2, release candidate #1

2021-07-04 Thread Yun Tang
@JING ZHANG , thanks for your reminder and you could comment on my PR for further discussion. Best Yun Tang From: Xintong Song Sent: Monday, July 5, 2021 10:09 To: dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 1.13.2, release candidate #1 +1 (binding) - verified checksums

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.13.2, release candidate #1

2021-07-04 Thread Yangze Guo
+1 (non-binding) - built from sources - run example jobs with standalone and yarn. - check TaskManager's rest API from the JM master and its standby, everything looks good Best, Yangze Guo On Mon, Jul 5, 2021 at 10:10 AM Xintong Song wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > - verified checksums &

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.13.2, release candidate #1

2021-07-04 Thread Xintong Song
+1 (binding) - verified checksums & signatures - built from sources - run example jobs with standalone and native k8s (with custom image) deployments * job execution looks fine * nothing unexpected found in logs and web ui Thank you~ Xintong Song On Sun, Jul 4, 2021 at 12:36 PM JING

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.13.2, release candidate #1

2021-07-03 Thread JING ZHANG
Hi yun, Website pull request lists[6] and JIRA release notes[1] both contain unfinished JIRA (such as FLINK-22955). Is it expected? Best regards, JING ZHANG Dawid Wysakowicz 于2021年7月2日周五 下午9:05写道: > +1 (binding) > >- verified signatures and checksums >- reviewed the announcement PR >

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.13.2, release candidate #1

2021-07-02 Thread Dawid Wysakowicz
+1 (binding) * verified signatures and checksums * reviewed the announcement PR * built from sources and run an example, quickly checked Web UI * checked diff of pom.xml and NOTICE files from 1.13.1, o commons-io updated, o bundled guava:failureaccess addded in

[VOTE] Release 1.13.2, release candidate #1

2021-07-01 Thread Yun Tang
Hi everyone, Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 1.13.2, as follows: [ ] +1, Approve the release [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments) The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes: * JIRA release notes [1],