Hi, Lincoln
Thanks for join this discussion.
After rethinking, I think your suggestion is make sense, although currently
deleting the workflow on the Scheduler and relying only on the
RefreshHandler is enough, if in the future we support cascading deletion,
the DeleteWorkflowOperation can
Hi Jeyhun,
I have changed the scope of FLIP to exclude problems addressed by FLIP-284
and redefined scope to introduce timeout configuration.
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 at 20:57, Ahmed Hamdy wrote:
> Hi Jeyhun,
> Thanks for your feedback. I agree the phrasing is a bit
Hi Priya,
It seems that we have acquired the threshold of binding votes, Should we
close the vote, announce the result and create Jiras?
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 at 03:24, Leonard Xu wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Best,
> Leonard
>
> > 2024年4月17日 上午2:25，Robert Metzger 写道：
> >
>
+1 (non-binding)
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Sat, 27 Apr 2024 at 02:46, Muhammet Orazov
wrote:
>
> Hey Yubin, +1 (non-binding)
>
> Looks good, thanks!
>
> Best,
> Muhammet
>
> On 2024-04-24 08:56, Yubin Li wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > During the implementation of the "describe catalog"
+1 (non-binding)
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Sat, 27 Apr 2024 at 05:33, ConradJam wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Biao Geng 于2024年4月26日周五 18:45写道：
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Best,
> > Biao Geng
> >
> >
> > gongzhongqiang 于2024年4月26日周五 00:41写道：
> >
> > > +1( (non-binding)
> > >
> > >
> > >
Kanthi Vaidya created FLINK-35289:
-
Summary: Incorrect timestamp of stream elements collected from
onTimer in batch mode
Key: FLINK-35289
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-35289
+1 (non-binding)
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Fri, 3 May 2024 at 15:16, Jeyhun Karimov wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
>
> Thanks for driving this FLIP David.
>
> Regards,
> Jeyhun
>
> On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 2:21 PM Mark Nuttall wrote:
>
> > +1, I would also like to see first class support for Avro
Hi Qisheng,
+1 (non-binding)
- Verified checksums and hashes
- Verified signatures
- Verified github tag exists
- Verified no binaries in source
- build source
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Fri, 3 May 2024 at 23:03, Jeyhun Karimov wrote:
> Hi Qinsheng,
>
> Thanks for driving the release.
>
Hi Martijn
Thanks for the proposal +1 from me.
Should this change take place in 1.20, what are the planned release steps
for connectors that only offer a deprecated interface in this case (i.e.
RabbitMQ, Cassandra, pusbub, Hbase)? Are we going to refrain from releases
that support 1.20+ till the
