Hi Denis,
JCL it's wrapper for logging system (similar sl4j) which can be used
together with log4j. I guess that JavaDoc correct.
On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 5:40 PM, Denis Magda wrote:
> Nikolai,
>
> Looking at JCL documentation I see the usage of Log4j together with JCL:
>
> *
Nikolay Tikhonov created IGNITE-5848:
Summary: Ignite should support Hibernate 5.2.X
Key: IGNITE-5848
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5848
Project: Ignite
Issue Type
Nikolay Tikhonov created IGNITE-5489:
Summary: Possible connection leaks when loadPreviousValue set to
true
Key: IGNITE-5489
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5489
Project: Ignite
Nikolay Tikhonov created IGNITE-5290:
Summary: Events might be missed during concurrent CQ registration
and cache operations
Key: IGNITE-5290
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5290
Nikolay Tikhonov created IGNITE-5214:
Summary: ConcurrentModificationException with enable DEBUG log
level
Key: IGNITE-5214
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5214
Project: Ignite
Nikolay Tikhonov created IGNITE-4939:
Summary: Receive event before cache initialized
Key: IGNITE-4939
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4939
Project: Ignite
Issue Type
Nikolay Tikhonov created IGNITE-4901:
Summary: Decrease logging level for DataStremer retry
Key: IGNITE-4901
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4901
Project: Ignite
Issue
Nikolay Tikhonov created IGNITE-4590:
Summary: Lock/unlock operations are hanging when topology changed
Key: IGNITE-4590
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4590
Project: Ignite
Nikolay Tikhonov created IGNITE-4589:
Summary: Possible starvation during rebalancing for marshaller
cache
Key: IGNITE-4589
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4589
Project: Ignite
Nikolay Tikhonov created IGNITE-4344:
Summary: Client node allocates off heap memories for caches
Key: IGNITE-4344
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4344
Project: Ignite
Nikolay Tikhonov created IGNITE-4052:
Summary: Add ability to set up users for MESOS
Key: IGNITE-4052
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4052
Project: Ignite
Issue Type
Nikolay Tikhonov created IGNITE-4047:
Summary: CQ skips events if autoUnsubscribe flag was set to false
Key: IGNITE-4047
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4047
Project: Ignite
Nikolay Tikhonov created IGNITE-4014:
Summary: Transaction hangs if entry processor failed during
serialization
Key: IGNITE-4014
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4014
Project
Nikolay Tikhonov created IGNITE-3878:
Summary: Add isPrimary() and isBackup() methods on
CacheQUeryEntryEvent
Key: IGNITE-3878
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3878
Project
Nikolay Tikhonov created IGNITE-3867:
Summary: ScanQuery ignore pageSize propertry
Key: IGNITE-3867
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3867
Project: Ignite
Issue Type: Bug
Nikolay Tikhonov created IGNITE-3850:
Summary: Need to add support WIN for YARN integration
Key: IGNITE-3850
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3850
Project: Ignite
Issue
Nikolay Tikhonov created IGNITE-3433:
Summary: Uninformative error message for affinity function
Key: IGNITE-3433
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3433
Project: Ignite
Hi Aliaksandr!
I've reviewed and merge your changes to master.
Thank you for your contribution!
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 5:31 PM, Denis Magda wrote:
> Nikolay,
>
> As a maintainer of this component please do the review.
>
> —
> Denis
>
> > On Jun 5, 2016, at 3:18 PM,
Nikolay Tikhonov created IGNITE-3272:
Summary: Memory consumption in ContinuousQueryHandler
Key: IGNITE-3272
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3272
Project: Ignite
Issue
Nikolay Tikhonov created IGNITE-3268:
Summary: Integration with YARN in net without internet
Key: IGNITE-3268
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3268
Project: Ignite
Issue
Nikolay Tikhonov created IGNITE-3214:
Summary: YARN allocates containers at random
Key: IGNITE-3214
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3214
Project: Ignite
Issue Type
Nikolay Tikhonov created IGNITE-3188:
Summary: Binary marshaller doesn't unmarshal a void type
Key: IGNITE-3188
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3188
Project: Ignite
Nikolay Tikhonov created IGNITE-3183:
Summary: ScanQuery and localEntries are ignored keepBinary flag in
OFFHEAP_TIERED mode
Key: IGNITE-3183
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3183
+1 (binding)
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Anton Vinogradov wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 12:16 AM, Vladimir Ozerov
> wrote:
>
> > Looks good to me.
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 10:11 PM, Denis
Nikolay Tikhonov created IGNITE-3168:
Summary: Ignite mesos framework should provide ability to
configure timeouts.
Key: IGNITE-3168
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3168
Project
Nikolay Tikhonov created IGNITE-3083:
Summary: Shmem loader failed with OverlappingFileLockException
Key: IGNITE-3083
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3083
Project: Ignite
<dsetrak...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Instead of the Async annotation, why not just have a setter
> “setAsyncFilter(true)”?
>
> D.
>
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 4:33 AM, Nikolay Tikhonov <ntikho...@gridgain.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Yakov is right. Benchmarks show perform
1.6 versions.
>
> D.
>
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 6:36 AM, Nikolay Tikhonov <ntikho...@gridgain.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > Thank you for efforts and feedback!
> >
> > Vova,
> > I'll change our documentation that points will be more clear.
> >
&g
Hi,
Thank you for efforts and feedback!
Vova,
I'll change our documentation that points will be more clear.
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Vladimir Ozerov
wrote:
> Hi,
> Thank you for such deep and thorough analysis. I think we definitely
> reflect your findings in our
ck,
> >
> > Can you explain why we would ever want to have a synchronous callback?
> > Aren’t all filter notifications supposed to be asynchronous, especially
> if
> > there is no performance degradation?
> >
> > D.
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 11:
n Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 3:58 AM, Nikolay Tikhonov <ntikho...@gridgain.com>
> wrote:
>
> > We are close to completing IGNITE-2004 ticket.
> > As part this ticket was made the following changes on public API
> > - if callback has @IgniteAsyncCallback annotation then cal
Nikolay Tikhonov created IGNITE-2630:
Summary: Make 'updateCntr' available through CacheInterceptor API
Key: IGNITE-2630
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2630
Project: Ignite
Val,
Our docker repo contains not only the latest version or 1.0.0-incubating,
there all versions. List of versions here [1]. I've updated "Dockerfile"
tab, now it shows dockerfile from "1.5.0.final" tag.
[1] https://hub.docker.com/r/apacheignite/ignite/tags
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 9:34 AM,
Nikolay Tikhonov created IGNITE-2435:
Summary: Mesos doesn't work with limited access to internet
Key: IGNITE-2435
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2435
Project: Ignite
Hi Edouard!
I think it useful future and don't see any reason why you can't implement
this task. Feel free to ask if you have questions.
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 6:08 PM, Edouard Chevalier <
edouard.cheval...@techmydata.net> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm Edouard Chevalier and I would like to
;
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Nikolay Tikhonov <ntikho...@gridgain.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > >
> > > In that case, why does the docker image contain any version of Ignite
> at
> > > all?
> > >
> > We download docker image which
Dima,
Docker hub shows Dockerfile for `1.0.0-incubating` tag [1]. For this tag it
is correct. [2]
I would prefer see Dockerfile for the latest version, but I can't find
functionality to change it. I'll ask DockerHub community how fix it.
1.
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 8:39 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan
wrote:
>
>
> I am not sure I understand. Are you suggesting we have different docker
> files for different versions?
Yes, for each Ignite version need to create Dockerfile with version and tag
on DockerHub.
I would
>
> In that case, why does the docker image contain any version of Ignite at
> all?
>
We download docker image which was built from Dockerfile (which contains
specific version of Ignite) and the image contains Ignite distributive.
Apache Ignite distributive is downloaded only once in during the
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Anton Vinogradov
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 4:17 PM, 姜 为 wrote:
>
> > +1 nice job!
> >
> > > 在 2015年12月29日,下午6:54,Anton Vinogradov 写道:
> > >
> > > Dear Sirs!
>
+1
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Anton Vinogradov
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Yakov Zhdanov wrote:
>
> > Dear Sirs!
> >
> > We have uploaded release candidate to
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ignite/1.5.0-b1-rc1/
I'm fully agree with Yakov. We plain to release massive changes and I think
that it's good chance for community to play with new features and we can
get more feedback.
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 7:32 PM, Alexey Kuznetsov
wrote:
> +1 for EA
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:30
I've merged changes related to IGNITE-426 (Make sure continuous queries
notifications are not missed in case primary node fails
) task.
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 5:53 PM, Anton Vinogradov
wrote:
> Twitter intergration
> *https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-530
>
Nikolay Tikhonov created IGNITE-1922:
Summary: Add auth support to YARN module
Key: IGNITE-1922
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1922
Project: Ignite
Issue Type
I implemented changes related to IGNITE-426 task. Currently investigating
performance degradation for atomic caches. I expect the ticket to be merged
in 2 days.
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 6:47 PM, Alexey Goncharuk wrote:
> IGNITE-950 is taking more time to be merged
45 matches
Mail list logo