On 08/06/15 10:25, Claude Warren wrote:
What exactly is this review asking? Change in strategy or change in docs?
Both :-)
concurrency-howto does not mention transactions except in passing. It
shoudl be more pro-transactions IMO.
A possibility is that Dataset are all transactional, even
On 08/06/15 17:48, Marco Neumann wrote:
is TDB2 going to replace TDB or is TDB2 a new cluster product?
Whatever people (users, developers) want. Migrating Dbs is not as easy
as ungrading code. Running oaj.tdb and oaj.tdb2 side by side
(TDB2 is itself 7 maven modules ATM - some can be
Hadoop/Elephas is an example of a general problem with Guava. By
reputation, upgrading Guava across versions has been problematic -
subtle and not-so-subtle changes of behaviour or removed code.
When Jena is used as a library, the system or application in which it is
used might use Guava
So to be clear, part of the idea here is to boost the visibility of
transactions, and one of the things that wants doing as part of that is to
provide for copy-on-add-graph semantics for the in-memory dataset so that
transactionality is coherent across such a dataset. Right now it instead is a
Github user amiara514 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/53#issuecomment-110094664
I reorganized tests part
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
On 08/06/15 10:27, Qihong Lin wrote:
Hi,
The grammar has been modified for the problems you pointed out.
I've tried to run grammar script to generate arq.jj, sparql_11.jj and
their parser java classes, in cygwin with JavaCC 5.0. However the
generated java classes are different from those in the
On 08/06/15 20:38, aj...@virginia.edu wrote:
So to be clear, part of the idea here is to boost the visibility of
transactions, and one of the things that wants doing as part of that
is to provide for copy-on-add-graph semantics for the in-memory
dataset so that transactionality is coherent
is TDB2 going to replace TDB or is TDB2 a new cluster product?
Marco
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote:
Informational announcement: TDB2
TDB2 is a reworking of TDB based on updated implementations of transactions
and transactional data structures for
Hi,
The grammar has been modified for the problems you pointed out.
I've tried to run grammar script to generate arq.jj, sparql_11.jj and
their parser java classes, in cygwin with JavaCC 5.0. However the
generated java classes are different from those in the code base:
1) ARQParser
- the new
What exactly is this review asking? Change in strategy or change in docs?
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 8:30 PM, Andy Seaborne (JIRA) j...@apache.org
wrote:
Andy Seaborne created JENA-957:
--
Summary: Review concurrency howto in the light of
Stian Soiland-Reyes created JENA-959:
Summary: riot: gzip output option
Key: JENA-959
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-959
Project: Apache Jena
Issue Type: New Feature
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stian Soiland-Reyes updated JENA-959:
-
Description:
The riot command line tool supports incoming file formats like *.ttl.gz, but
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14577215#comment-14577215
]
A. Soroka edited comment on JENA-959 at 6/8/15 1:53 PM:
What do you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14577215#comment-14577215
]
A. Soroka edited comment on JENA-959 at 6/8/15 1:53 PM:
What do you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14577215#comment-14577215
]
A. Soroka commented on JENA-959:
What do you think of the idea of an independent flag
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14577220#comment-14577220
]
Stian Soiland-Reyes commented on JENA-959:
--
Yeah, either should work. It might be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14577219#comment-14577219
]
Stian Soiland-Reyes commented on JENA-959:
--
Yeah, either should work. It might be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stian Soiland-Reyes updated JENA-959:
-
Comment: was deleted
(was: Yeah, either should work. It might be worth also having explicit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14577228#comment-14577228
]
A. Soroka commented on JENA-959:
Okay, I'll take this ticket forward a bit working on the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14577215#comment-14577215
]
A. Soroka edited comment on JENA-959 at 6/8/15 1:53 PM:
What do you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14577264#comment-14577264
]
Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-959:
Currently, it is reasonably orthogonal to the
Github user amiara514 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/53#issuecomment-109986517
Hi, PR is mergeable again after conflict fixing of #72.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user osma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/53#issuecomment-109996262
Thanks for fixing, and sorry for causing the conflict with #72.
It's good that you've added unit tests, however I think there could be more
of them.
The
I think the idea of breaking the shaded Guava artifact out of the main cycle is
great. It's clearly not a subject of work under most circumstances and having
one less moving part in a developer's mix is usually a good thing, especially
for the simple-minded ({raises hand}).
Is it only Hadoop's
Ah right. To summarise what is happening:
The POM file in the maven repo is not the POM file in git.The shade
plugin produces a different POM for the the output artifact with the
shaded dependency removed.
When the project is not open, Eclipse sees the reduced POM, which does
not have a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14577264#comment-14577264
]
Andy Seaborne edited comment on JENA-959 at 6/8/15 2:42 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-804?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14577340#comment-14577340
]
Keith Wells commented on JENA-804:
--
This issue has become a pain point: we have encountered
On 08/06/15 15:47, aj...@virginia.edu wrote:
In examining and discussing
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-959, it seems to me (a
Jena newbie!) that Jena's CLI action is built up in jena-core, in
package jena.cmdline.
If that is correct, and Jena has its own CLI code, wouldn't it be
Github user amiara514 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/53#issuecomment-110026337
Ok I see, I will add a similar case of graph-specific for deletion
support.
One question about graph indexing. In jena-text documentation you mention:
This
Github user amiara514 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/53#issuecomment-110032217
@osma oups, forget my message.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14577268#comment-14577268
]
A. Soroka commented on JENA-959:
I'm a little confused now [~andy.seaborne]-- are you
In examining and discussing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-959, it
seems to me (a Jena newbie!) that Jena's CLI action is built up in jena-core,
in package jena.cmdline.
If that is correct, and Jena has its own CLI code, wouldn't it be better to
replace this with a modern CLI
Okay, that makes sense.
Is the larger move (the construction of 'jena-cmd') worth an epic in Jira? With
the smaller (take arq.cmd* to jena-base/jena.cmd* and drop
jena-core/jena.cmdline) as a first story therein?
---
A. Soroka
The University of Virginia Library
On Jun 8, 2015, at 11:24 AM,
Informational announcement: TDB2
TDB2 is a reworking of TDB based on updated implementations of
transactions and transactional data structures for project Lizard (a
clustered SPARQL store).
TDB2 has:
* Arbitrary scale write-once transactions
* New transaction system - can add other first
On 08/06/15 16:41, Andy Seaborne wrote:
Informational announcement: TDB2
TDB2 is a reworking of TDB based on updated implementations of
transactions and transactional data structures for project Lizard (a
clustered SPARQL store).
TDB2 has:
* Arbitrary scale write-once transactions
* New
35 matches
Mail list logo
