[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Claude Warren reassigned JENA-1007:
---
Assignee: Claude Warren
harden query builder tests
---
On 10/08/15 15:37, Claude Warren wrote:
Howdy,
Back on June 15 Andy forwarded a note with the above topic laying out how
to run JDeps from Java8 to see if we are dependant upon the JDK-Internal
APIs (I don't think so). Did anyone actually run the tests? I could not
find any discussion of
Howdy,
Back on June 15 Andy forwarded a note with the above topic laying out how
to run JDeps from Java8 to see if we are dependant upon the JDK-Internal
APIs (I don't think so). Did anyone actually run the tests? I could not
find any discussion of results.
Claude
--
I like: Like Like - The
Claude Warren created JENA-1007:
---
Summary: harden query builder tests
Key: JENA-1007
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1007
Project: Apache Jena
Issue Type: Improvement
I have read that the new Java 9 spec will remove all unsafe methods and
classes. I'll take a run at this later this week when I get some time. I
just wanted to know if it was already done or not. Thx.
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote:
On 10/08/15 15:37,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Claude Warren closed JENA-1007.
---
Resolution: Duplicate
As noted -- duplicate of JENA-972
harden query builder tests
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-975?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Claude Warren updated JENA-975:
---
Assignee: Claude Warren
Component/s: (was: Jena)
QueryBuilder
The problem
Hi Qihong,
You may have received the reminder email from Google that the final
evaluation of the GSoC project is approaching. The soft deadline is
17 August, with the hard one on 21 August. It means there're only 2
weeks left for your remaining work. The tests of arq need improving,
as Andy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14679921#comment-14679921
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-988:
--
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Seaborne resolved JENA-988.
Resolution: Implemented
Assignee: Andy Seaborne
Fix Version/s: Jena 3.0.1
Open TDB
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14679903#comment-14679903
]
Andy Seaborne edited comment on JENA-988 at 8/10/15 10:29 AM:
--
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/90
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14679903#comment-14679903
]
Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-988:
Added a function in TDBFactory to test whether
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1000?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Seaborne closed JENA-1000.
---
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
Assignee: Andy Seaborne
Fix Version/s: Jena 3.0.1
Report
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Seaborne resolved JENA-960.
Resolution: Done
Fix Version/s: Jena 3.0.0
jena-base now has the command line processing code.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Seaborne closed JENA-960.
--
The construction of jena-cmd
Key: JENA-960
Github user ajs6f commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/90#issuecomment-129442497
Since commit
https://github.com/apache/jena/commit/fd5a94ae61bcd32d2a82cebb6d088d0d81f1da39
contains literally none of the usage advice that was the only purpose of this
PR
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1000?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14680111#comment-14680111
]
Donald Pellegrino commented on JENA-1000:
-
The broken run of tdbloader makes sense.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1000?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14680116#comment-14680116
]
Donald Pellegrino commented on JENA-1000:
-
The custom: prefix was not input during
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14680120#comment-14680120
]
A. Soroka commented on JENA-960:
In fact, the command line processing code remains scattered
Hi,
I've enriched the syntax tests with short form and default graph cases.
For execution tests, I add the test support in QueryTest for construct
quad with the scripts files and data files in TRIG (see
jena-arq/testing/ARQ/Construct/*.trig). I think construct quad should
be part of the
21 matches
Mail list logo
