Re: Fwd: Final Deliveries of GSoC Project (JENA-491)

2015-08-18 Thread Qihong Lin
Hi Andy, Thank for your comments! I can understand your idea of A/ B/ C/. But there'a problem in practice. In brief: For A/, at the server side, always call QueryExecutionBase::execConstructDataset() For B/, the problem is, there're overlaps between DEF.rdfOffer and DEF.quadsOffer, e.g. TriX,

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1010) Wrong parsing of aggregate functions in HAVING clause

2015-08-18 Thread Andy Seaborne (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1010?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14701035#comment-14701035 ] Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-1010: - See JENA-963. Fixed in Jena 3.0.0. The problem

[jira] [Resolved] (JENA-1010) Wrong parsing of aggregate functions in HAVING clause

2015-08-18 Thread Andy Seaborne (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1010?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andy Seaborne resolved JENA-1010. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: Jena 3.0.0 Wrong parsing of aggregate functions in HAVING

[jira] [Assigned] (JENA-1010) Wrong parsing of aggregate functions in HAVING clause

2015-08-18 Thread Andy Seaborne (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1010?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andy Seaborne reassigned JENA-1010: --- Assignee: Andy Seaborne Wrong parsing of aggregate functions in HAVING clause

Re: svn commit: r1696184 - /jena/site/trunk/content/documentation/query/construct-quad.mdtext

2015-08-18 Thread Qihong Lin
Hi Dr. Jiang Thank you! I'll refine the doc following your instructions. regards, Qihong On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Ying Jiang jpz6311...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Qihong, You can improve the doc: 1) The grammar table collapses. I can see a | in the first row, which needs to be escaped.

Re: Fwd: Final Deliveries of GSoC Project (JENA-491)

2015-08-18 Thread Andy Seaborne
On 18/08/15 08:44, Qihong Lin wrote: Hi Andy, Thank for your comments! I can understand your idea of A/ B/ C/. But there'a problem in practice. In brief: For A/, at the server side, always call QueryExecutionBase::execConstructDataset() For B/, the problem is, there're overlaps between

[jira] [Created] (JENA-1010) Wrong parsing of aggregate functions in HAVING clause

2015-08-18 Thread Ruben Navarro Piris (JIRA)
Ruben Navarro Piris created JENA-1010: - Summary: Wrong parsing of aggregate functions in HAVING clause Key: JENA-1010 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1010 Project: Apache Jena