Re: [VOTE][LAZY] Accept jena-ontapi into the Apache Jena codebase

+1 Andy Seaborne schrieb am Fr., 3. Mai 2024, 19:17: > This is a lazy consensus VOTE to accept a PR for a new module > jena-ontapi that enhances Apache Jena with OWL2 support. > > https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/2420 > from @sszuev > > This vote is open until > > 05:00am UTC Wednesday

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Jena 5.0.0

Hi Chris, after my question was answered, I voted ("[x] +1 Approve the release" on 17.03.2024, 01:12) So I guess Andy's summary was correct:: " The vote passes with 3 PMCs members (Rob, Claude, Andy) and two community votes from Arne and Marco. " Arne Am Mi., 17. Apr. 2024 um 11:08 Uhr schrieb

Re: [] Apache Jena 5.0.0

[x] +1 Approve the release Andy Seaborne schrieb am Sa., 16. März 2024, 22:49: > > > On 16/03/2024 19:50, Arne Bernhardt wrote: > > Hi, > > > > it may be nothing but on my system there are a few "ERROR "s in the > > console that I can't catego

Re: [VOTE] Apache Jena 4.9.0 RC1

+1 Successfully tested in our "product" dev environment. Arne Am Di., 4. Juli 2023 um 21:24 Uhr schrieb Andy Seaborne : > Hi, > > Here is a vote on the release of Apache Jena 4.9.0. > This is the first release candidate. > > The deadline is > > Saturday, 8th July 2023 at 05:00 UTC > >

Re: Towards Jena 4.9.0

On 22/06/2023 21:08, Arne Bernhardt wrote: > > Do you think it would be possible to integrate > > https://github.com/apache/jena/issues/1912 in Jena 4.9.0 ? > > So there would be enough time and feedback to see if it can replace > > GraphMem as default in Jena 5.0.0? >

Re: Towards Jena 4.9.0

Do you think it would be possible to integrate https://github.com/apache/jena/issues/1912 in Jena 4.9.0 ? So there would be enough time and feedback to see if it can replace GraphMem as default in Jena 5.0.0? Arne Am Do., 22. Juni 2023 um 12:55 Uhr schrieb Andy Seaborne : > Jena 2.8.0 was

Re: Why DatasetGraphInMemory?

. There was no increase in memory usage. It even seems to be more GC friendly than GraphMem in the same scenario. So I decided to create https://github.com/apache/jena/issues/1912. Arne Am Sa., 17. Juni 2023 um 17:33 Uhr schrieb Andy Seaborne : > > > On 12/06/2023 21:36, Arne Bernhardt wrot

Re: Why DatasetGraphInMemory?

d that I could use to test if I ever need one of these methods? Arne Andy Seaborne schrieb am Mo., 22. Mai 2023, 16:52: > > > On 20/05/2023 17:18, Arne Bernhardt wrote: > > Hi Andy, > > thank you, that was very helpful to get the whole picture. > > > > Some time ago, I

Re: Why DatasetGraphInMemory?

Am Mo., 22. Mai 2023 um 16:52 Uhr schrieb Andy Seaborne : > > > On 20/05/2023 17:18, Arne Bernhardt wrote: > > Hi Andy, > > thank you, that was very helpful to get the whole picture. > > > > Some time ago, I told you that at my workplace we implemented an &g

Re: Why DatasetGraphInMemory?

t; > Fuseki, as a database server, likely won’t benefit (except perhaps in some > peoples custom configuration setups). However, people who want performance > with Fuseki should already be using TDB anyway. > > Hope this helps, > > Rob > > From: Arne Bernhardt > Date: Frida

Re: Why DatasetGraphInMemory?

all #add and #remove operations would have to be done 3-4 times. The idea is still a bit blurry in my head. What do you think? Arne Am Sa., 20. Mai 2023 um 15:19 Uhr schrieb Andy Seaborne : > Hi Arne, > > On 19/05/2023 21:21, Arne Bernhardt wrote: > > Hi, > > in a

Why DatasetGraphInMemory?

Hi, in a recent response to an issue it was said that "Fuseki - uses DatasetGraphInMemory mostly" . For my PR , I added a JMH benchmark suite to the project. So it was easy for me to

Re: Resolving against bad URI - parsing CIM RDF/XML reference data for CGMES with Jena 4.8.SNAPSHOT

rations. > > Andy > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8141.html > https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4122.html > > PS There will be a transition legacy route to get to the 4.7.0 parser > but that is temporary. > > On 03/03/2023 21:47, Arne Bernhardt wrote: > > Hello, &g

Resolving against bad URI - parsing CIM RDF/XML reference data for CGMES with Jena 4.8.SNAPSHOT

Hello, the following code, which works fine under Jena 4.6, no longer works under Jena 4.8.SNAPSHOT: RDFParser.create() .source(graphUri) .base("urn:uuid") .lang(Lang.RDFXML) .parse(streamSink); The graph looks like this: http://iec.ch/TC57/CIM100#; xmlns:md="