+1 Built and Verified on Mac OS
Rob
From: Andy Seaborne
Date: Saturday, 16 March 2024 at 19:16
To: dev@jena.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Jena 5.0.0
[x] +1 Approve the release
Andy
On 16/03/2024 18:32, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is a vote on the release of Apache Jena
+1 (binding)
Built and verified on OS X
Review notes:
* Some of the NOTICE files (specifically the one that ends up in
jena-fuseki2/jena-fuseki-server/src/main/resources/META-INF/NOTICE) still
reference jsonld-java which we no longer use/bundle. The only dependency on it
I can find is
+1
Built and verified on OS X
(Apologies for the late vote, only just back from holiday)
Rob
From: Andy Seaborne
Date: Tuesday, 24 October 2023 at 13:53
To: dev@jena.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Apache Jena 4.10.0 RC 1
Hi,
Here is a vote on the release of Apache Jena 4.10.0.
This is the first
+1 All sounds like a solid plan to me
Rob
From: Andy Seaborne
Date: Thursday, 12 October 2023 at 21:05
To: dev@jena.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lazy] Jena5 Branch
On 12/10/2023 10:40, Bruno Kinoshita wrote:
...
> Given that I believe most of the Jena development should now be focused on
>
+1
Validated release candidate on OS X
Rob
From: Bruno Kinoshita
Date: Tuesday, 4 July 2023 at 22:37
To: dev@jena.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Jena 4.9.0 RC1
+1
Building OK for me from tag on
Apache Maven 3.8.5 (3599d3414f046de2324203b78ddcf9b5e4388aa0)
Maven home:
Fuseki is effectively the Jena projects database server that allows sharing a
single Jena Dataset amongst many processes and users.
This means that users expect database server like behaviour, i.e.,
transactions, read isolation which the transactional in-memory dataset
provides, when running
+1
Built with Java 17 on OS X, no problems building from source on my end
Rob
From: Andy Seaborne
Date: Sunday, 16 April 2023 at 18:13
To: dev@jena.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Apache Jena 4.8.0 RC1
Hi,
Here is a vote on the release of Apache Jena 4.8.0.
This is the first release candidate.
Yes, that sounds like a sensible approach
Value handling that involves normalizing and canonicalizing what are
effectively document formats just seems like a major DoS vector in the same way
we’ve seen with things like XML DTDs in the past
Rob
From: Andy Seaborne
Date: Sunday, 26 February
