Yes just x and y on a flat surface.
On Sat 6 Jan 2024, 00:45 Marco Neumann, wrote:
> Can you give an example? you just want to use x and y instead of WGS84
> coordinates?
>
> On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 11:28 PM Claude Warren wrote:
>
> > I want to use the geospatial capabilities of Jena but
yes, a lot of the geosparql functions will push you towards geo.
It might be better to just reuse the existing low level functions. My first
spatial implementation for Jena in 2006 made use of the JTS Topology Suite.
JTS is still used in Jena today to run some of the low level evaluation
that idea, needs a bit more clarification
On Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 3:01 PM Claude Warren wrote:
> Perhaps we should think about a Geometry SPARQL extension.
>
> On Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 1:51 PM Marco Neumann
> wrote:
>
> > It used to be all on Google Code. I believe Google folded that site
> > a
In terms of geo you would talk about some sort of equidistant projection
that is available via the CRS/SRS.This is currently implemented with Apache
SIS in Jena.
But it sounds like geo isn't really your thing here, so in conclusion
geosparql isn't either as it's all about geo data.
What type of
Marco,
Is your earlier code available in a repository somewhere? I'd love to get
a head start on the functions.
Claude
On Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 12:43 PM Marco Neumann
wrote:
> yes, a lot of the geosparql functions will push you towards geo.
>
> It might be better to just reuse the existing low
It used to be all on Google Code. I believe Google folded that site
a few years ago. I will have a look through my backups. But to be frank it
would be straightforward to implement nowadays and the old code would be
pre Jena 3.
You might be able to get at some of the pre 2007 stuff by way of
Background: I am building an "autonomous chair side table" for my wife.
The goal is to have the table carry her tea from the kitchen to whatever
room she is in. As part of this project I am building a reasoning system
that builds a map based on various inputs (that I call scanners). I store
all
Perhaps we should think about a Geometry SPARQL extension.
On Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 1:51 PM Marco Neumann
wrote:
> It used to be all on Google Code. I believe Google folded that site
> a few years ago. I will have a look through my backups. But to be frank it
> would be straightforward to
