Marco Neumann created JENA-1551:
---
Summary: Online Query Form for experimenting with SPARQL queries
produces 404
Key: JENA-1551
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1551
Project: Apache Jena
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1551?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marco Neumann updated JENA-1551:
Description:
Sparql query form [http://www.sparql.org/query.html] produces 404 on Get
Results
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1551?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16497814#comment-16497814
]
Marco Neumann commented on JENA-1551:
-
if it isn't used anymore take it down. The link is too
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1551?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16497864#comment-16497864
]
Marco Neumann commented on JENA-1551:
-
thank you.
> Online Query Form for experimenting with SPARQL
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16808204#comment-16808204
]
Marco Neumann commented on JENA-1693:
-
yes sounds like a good idea. I will post it to the public list
Marco Neumann created JENA-1693:
---
Summary: Add Aggregate Function MEDIAN To SPARQL ARQ Syntax
Key: JENA-1693
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1693
Project: Apache Jena
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marco Neumann updated JENA-1693:
Description:
As briefly mentioned to Andy Seaborne I'd like to see the aggregate function
MEDIAN
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16808780#comment-16808780
]
Marco Neumann commented on JENA-1693:
-
is this Jira issue tracker the best place to discuss this? Is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16804384#comment-16804384
]
Marco Neumann commented on JENA-1693:
-
[~ajs6f], I did use and agreed with [~andy.seaborne] to use the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16840515#comment-16840515
]
Marco Neumann commented on JENA-1693:
-
reverted the two last changes in the fork. it should compile
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16837895#comment-16837895
]
Marco Neumann commented on JENA-1693:
-
add case for median(distinct())
> Add Aggregate Function
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16837897#comment-16837897
]
Marco Neumann commented on JENA-1693:
-
update javadoc
> Add Aggregate Function MEDIAN To SPARQL ARQ
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16837859#comment-16837859
]
Marco Neumann commented on JENA-1693:
-
very good [~ajs6f], I have finished and implemented the changes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16837859#comment-16837859
]
Marco Neumann edited comment on JENA-1693 at 5/11/19 1:26 PM:
--
very good
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16837896#comment-16837896
]
Marco Neumann commented on JENA-1693:
-
add median keyword to webapp SPARQL editor validation
> Add
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16837859#comment-16837859
]
Marco Neumann edited comment on JENA-1693 at 5/11/19 1:27 PM:
--
very good
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16837859#comment-16837859
]
Marco Neumann edited comment on JENA-1693 at 5/11/19 4:44 PM:
--
very good
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16840234#comment-16840234
]
Marco Neumann commented on JENA-1693:
-
created a new fork on github made the changes and made the PR.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16840264#comment-16840264
]
Marco Neumann edited comment on JENA-1693 at 5/15/19 10:06 AM:
---
just added a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16840264#comment-16840264
]
Marco Neumann commented on JENA-1693:
-
just added to a test case to my fork. Do I have to run another
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16840680#comment-16840680
]
Marco Neumann commented on JENA-1693:
-
now works with test for median function in sparql syntaxARQ
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16839569#comment-16839569
]
Marco Neumann commented on JENA-1693:
-
ok, can you please assign this jira issue here to me. I am
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16838101#comment-16838101
]
Marco Neumann commented on JENA-1693:
-
update completed for case median(distinct()) and result set now
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16831218#comment-16831218
]
Marco Neumann commented on JENA-1693:
-
A. Soroka did you get a chance to ready this for the 3.11
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16833882#comment-16833882
]
Marco Neumann commented on JENA-1693:
-
that's correct [~ajs6f], I have used the implementation for a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16833950#comment-16833950
]
Marco Neumann commented on JENA-1693:
-
OK [~ajs6f], I'd say the implementation should be fairly
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16832645#comment-16832645
]
Marco Neumann commented on JENA-1693:
-
ajs6f what I meant is: median = new
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16832599#comment-16832599
]
Marco Neumann commented on JENA-1693:
-
yes that be great for my use case. It would be equally ok with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1893?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marco Neumann updated JENA-1893:
Component/s: ARQ
> BIND variable not in scope for property function
>
Marco Neumann created JENA-1893:
---
Summary: BIND variable not in scope for property function
Key: JENA-1893
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1893
Project: Apache Jena
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1893?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marco Neumann updated JENA-1893:
Summary: Variable not in scope for property function (was: BIND variable
not in scope for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1893?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17098023#comment-17098023
]
Marco Neumann commented on JENA-1893:
-
yes, it's properly set linked data. if you add the ?x to the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1893?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marco Neumann updated JENA-1893:
Priority: Trivial (was: Major)
> Variable not in scope for property function
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1893?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17098364#comment-17098364
]
Marco Neumann commented on JENA-1893:
-
Thank you for the reference Andy. I presume ARQ applies the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1893?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marco Neumann updated JENA-1893:
Description:
following query doesn't produce results for ?subpop
PREFIX loticoowl:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1893?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17098351#comment-17098351
]
Marco Neumann commented on JENA-1893:
-
thanks for commenting Andy, still looks like Blazegraph is more
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17207486#comment-17207486
]
Marco Neumann commented on JENA-1969:
-
yes TDB2 would be good to have in the options list.
With
Marco Neumann created JENA-1970:
---
Summary: GeoSPARQL spatial:nearby geo:lat and geo:long indexing of
Literals
Key: JENA-1970
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1970
Project: Apache Jena
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17203191#comment-17203191
]
Marco Neumann edited comment on JENA-1970 at 9/28/20, 12:32 PM:
of course,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17203191#comment-17203191
]
Marco Neumann commented on JENA-1970:
-
of course, here comes an example query + data:
{code:sparql}
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17203191#comment-17203191
]
Marco Neumann edited comment on JENA-1970 at 9/28/20, 12:30 PM:
of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17204314#comment-17204314
]
Marco Neumann commented on JENA-1969:
-
this additional observation might be directly related this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17204314#comment-17204314
]
Marco Neumann edited comment on JENA-1969 at 9/29/20, 9:55 PM:
---
this
Marco Neumann created JENA-1969:
---
Summary: Can't start geosparql fuseki server with -rf and -t
Key: JENA-1969
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1969
Project: Apache Jena
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marco Neumann updated JENA-1969:
Description:
geosparql fuseki server can't be started with option combination -rf and -t as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17203115#comment-17203115
]
Marco Neumann commented on JENA-1970:
-
Indeed this is something similar I have recently mentioned to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17206731#comment-17206731
]
Marco Neumann commented on JENA-1969:
-
Great Greg, this looks good. I can now start the server with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17206750#comment-17206750
]
Marco Neumann commented on JENA-1969:
-
also in addition we had a request at ApacheCon 2020 for TDB2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marco Neumann updated JENA-1969:
Priority: Major (was: Minor)
> Can't start geosparql fuseki server with -rf and -t
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marco Neumann updated JENA-1969:
Issue Type: Improvement (was: New Feature)
> Can't start geosparql fuseki server with -rf and -t
>
Marco Neumann created JENA-2213:
---
Summary: Jena GeoSPARQL Tests Fail With SIS 1.1
Key: JENA-2213
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2213
Project: Apache Jena
Issue Type: Test
Marco Neumann created JENA-2216:
---
Summary: Jena Fuseki GeoSPARQL
Key: JENA-2216
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2216
Project: Apache Jena
Issue Type: Bug
Components:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17459737#comment-17459737
]
Marco Neumann commented on JENA-2216:
-
solution: remove exclusion from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marco Neumann updated JENA-2216:
Summary: Jena Fuseki GeoSPARQL fails to start (was: Jena Fuseki GeoSPARQL)
> Jena Fuseki GeoSPARQL
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17478800#comment-17478800
]
Marco Neumann commented on JENA-2213:
-
so I have compiled the project the SIS1.1 jar which seems to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17478800#comment-17478800
]
Marco Neumann edited comment on JENA-2213 at 1/19/22, 4:17 PM:
---
so I have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17478574#comment-17478574
]
Marco Neumann commented on JENA-2213:
-
Andy, these are value comparison errors based on a change to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17478775#comment-17478775
]
Marco Neumann commented on JENA-2213:
-
"Not for me.
main fails to compile without
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17478600#comment-17478600
]
Marco Neumann edited comment on JENA-2213 at 1/19/22, 11:37 AM:
[~andy] 5
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17478662#comment-17478662
]
Marco Neumann commented on JENA-2213:
-
jena-geosparql does compile and pass tests without "external"
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17478600#comment-17478600
]
Marco Neumann commented on JENA-2213:
-
5 Failures
SRSInfoTest.testBuildDomainEnvelope_OSGB36:104
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17478645#comment-17478645
]
Marco Neumann commented on JENA-2213:
-
that is indeed the case with a very limited set of reference
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17480758#comment-17480758
]
Marco Neumann commented on JENA-2213:
-
diff --git
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17480758#comment-17480758
]
Marco Neumann edited comment on JENA-2213 at 1/23/22, 11:40 PM:
diff --git
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17480758#comment-17480758
]
Marco Neumann edited comment on JENA-2213 at 1/23/22, 11:35 PM:
diff --git
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marco Neumann closed JENA-2213.
---
Fix Version/s: Jena 4.4.0
Resolution: Fixed
changes to values in tests have been made to suit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17480983#comment-17480983
]
Marco Neumann commented on JENA-2213:
-
[~andy] if you have used the values from the diff as posted we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17481063#comment-17481063
]
Marco Neumann commented on JENA-2213:
-
Ok I see [~andy] not a big deal these current values now will
68 matches
Mail list logo
