Jenkins build is still unstable: Kafka » Kafka Branch Builder » 3.2 #48

See

Jenkins build is unstable: Kafka » Kafka Branch Builder » 3.1 #120

See

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 3.3.0 Release

+1 from me! Thanks for volunteering, José. -John On Tue, May 10, 2022, at 17:53, José Armando García Sancio wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to volunteer for the release of Apache Kafka 3.3.0. If > people agree, I'll start working on the release plan and update this > thread. > > Thanks, >

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-832 Allow creating a producer/consumer using a producer/consumer config

Hi Francois, Thanks for your thoughts. I think it's worth noting that in regards to item 2, it's possible to explicitly declare the type parameters for a builder without capturing it in a variable; for example: KafkaProducer p = new Builder(...) .withKeySerializer(new StringSerializer())

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-834: Pause / Resume KafkaStreams Topologies

Hi Matthias, I like it. I've updated the KIP to reflect that detail; I put the details in the docs for pause. Cheers, Jim On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 7:51 PM Matthias J. Sax wrote: > Thanks for the KIP. Overall LGTM. > > Can we clarify one question: would it be allowed to call `pause()` >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-834: Pause / Resume KafkaStreams Topologies

Thanks Jim. +1 from me. On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 4:51 PM Matthias J. Sax wrote: > I had one minor question on the discuss thread. It's mainly about > clarifying and document the user contract. I am fine either way. > > +1 (binding) > > > -Matthias > > On 5/10/22 12:32 PM, Sophie Blee-Goldman

[jira] [Resolved] (KAFKA-7527) Enable Dependency Injection for Kafka Streams handlers (KIP-378)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matthias J. Sax resolved KAFKA-7527. Resolution: Fixed > Enable Dependency Injection for Kafka Streams handlers (KIP-378) >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-834: Pause / Resume KafkaStreams Topologies

I had one minor question on the discuss thread. It's mainly about clarifying and document the user contract. I am fine either way. +1 (binding) -Matthias On 5/10/22 12:32 PM, Sophie Blee-Goldman wrote: Thanks for the KIP! +1 (binding) On Tue, May 10, 2022, 12:24 PM Bruno Cadonna wrote:

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-834: Pause / Resume KafkaStreams Topologies

Thanks for the KIP. Overall LGTM. Can we clarify one question: would it be allowed to call `pause()` before calling `start()`? I don't see any reason why we would need to disallow it? It could be helpful to start a KafkaStreams client in paused state -- otherwise there is a race between

[DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 3.3.0 Release

Hi all, I would like to volunteer for the release of Apache Kafka 3.3.0. If people agree, I'll start working on the release plan and update this thread. Thanks, -José

[jira] [Resolved] (KAFKA-13892) Dedupe RemoveAccessControlEntryRecord in deleteAcls of AclControlManager

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-13892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrew Grant resolved KAFKA-13892. -- Resolution: Fixed > Dedupe RemoveAccessControlEntryRecord in deleteAcls of AclControlManager

[jira] [Resolved] (KAFKA-13879) Exponential backoff for reconnect does not work

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-13879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chern Yih Cheah resolved KAFKA-13879. - Resolution: Fixed > Exponential backoff for reconnect does not work >

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-835: Monitor KRaft Controller Quorum Health

Thanks for your feedback Jason, much appreciated. Here are the changes to the KIP: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/diffpagesbyversion.action?pageId=211883219=5=4 On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 1:34 PM Jason Gustafson wrote: > The approach sounds reasonable. By the way, I think one of the

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-832 Allow creating a producer/consumer using a producer/consumer config

Hello Chris, Thanks for the feedback. Builders is definitely the pattern to apply when an object needs to be built using different arguments/combinations. Here are my thoughts about the proposal: 1. The builder should only expose meaningful methods for the users such as the interceptors, the

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-835: Monitor KRaft Controller Quorum Health

Hi Jose, Thanks for the KIP. The approach sounds reasonable. By the way, I think one of the gaps we have today is when the leader gets partitioned from the remaining voters. I believe it continues acting as a leader indefinitely. I was considering whether this periodic write can address the

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-836: Addition of Information in DescribeQuorumResponse about Voter Lag

> @Niket does it make sense to add the Admin API to this KIP? Thanks Deng for pointing this out. I agree with Jason's suggestion. I will go ahead and add the admin API to this KIP. - Niket On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 11:44 AM Jason Gustafson wrote: > > Hello Niket, currently

Re: [VOTE] KIP-832 Allow creating a producer/consumer using a producer/consumer

Thanks for the KIP, François. +1 (binding) -Bill On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 10:45 AM John Roesler wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Thanks, François! > -John > > On Tue, May 10, 2022, at 03:09, Bruno Cadonna wrote: > > Hi Francois, > > > > Thanks for the KIP whose link is: > > >

[jira] [Resolved] (KAFKA-13862) Add And Subtract multiple config values is not supported in KRaft mode

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-13862?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jason Gustafson resolved KAFKA-13862. - Fix Version/s: 3.3.0 Resolution: Fixed > Add And Subtract multiple config values

Re: [VOTE] KIP-834: Pause / Resume KafkaStreams Topologies

Thanks for the KIP! +1 (binding) On Tue, May 10, 2022, 12:24 PM Bruno Cadonna wrote: > Thanks Jim, > > +1 (binding) > > Best, > Bruno > > On 10.05.22 21:19, John Roesler wrote: > > Thanks Jim, > > > > I’m +1 (binding) > > > > -John > > > > On Tue, May 10, 2022, at 14:05, Jim Hughes wrote: > >>

Re: [VOTE] KIP-834: Pause / Resume KafkaStreams Topologies

Thanks Jim, +1 (binding) Best, Bruno On 10.05.22 21:19, John Roesler wrote: Thanks Jim, I’m +1 (binding) -John On Tue, May 10, 2022, at 14:05, Jim Hughes wrote: Hi all, I'm asking for a vote on KIP-834: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=211882832 Thanks in

Re: [VOTE] KIP-834: Pause / Resume KafkaStreams Topologies

Thanks Jim, I’m +1 (binding) -John On Tue, May 10, 2022, at 14:05, Jim Hughes wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm asking for a vote on KIP-834: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=211882832 > > Thanks in advance! > > Jim

[VOTE] KIP-834: Pause / Resume KafkaStreams Topologies

Hi all, I'm asking for a vote on KIP-834: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=211882832 Thanks in advance! Jim

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-834: Pause / Resume KafkaStreams Topologies

Hi Bill, all, Thank you. I've updated the KIP to reflect pausing standby tasks as well. I think all the outstanding points have been addressed and I'm going to start the vote thread! Cheers, Jim On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 2:43 PM Bill Bejeck wrote: > Hi Jim, > > After reading the comments on

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-836: Addition of Information in DescribeQuorumResponse about Voter Lag

> Hello Niket, currently DescribeQuorumResponse is not a public API, we don’t have a Admin api or shell script to get DescribeQuorumResponse, so it’s unnecessary to submit a KIP to change it, you can just submit a PR to accomplish this. Hey Ziming, I think it is public. It was documented in

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-834: Pause / Resume KafkaStreams Topologies

Hi Jim, After reading the comments on the KIP, I agree that it makes sense to pause all activities and any changes can be made later on. Thanks, Bill On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 4:03 AM Bruno Cadonna wrote: > Hi Jim, > > Thanks for the KIP! > > I am fine with the KIP in general. > > However, I am

Jenkins build is still unstable: Kafka » Kafka Branch Builder » trunk #920

See

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-13892) Dedupe response objects in deleteAcls of AclControlManager

Andrew Grant created KAFKA-13892: Summary: Dedupe response objects in deleteAcls of AclControlManager Key: KAFKA-13892 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-13892 Project: Kafka

Re: [HEADS-UP] Modification to KIP Template

Hi, I did not see any comments nor concerns so I went ahead and added the Test Plan section to the KIP template. Thanks, Mickael On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 5:53 PM Mickael Maison wrote: > > Hi, > > Unearthing this old thread as today I stumbled on the issue that > Ismael reported. It looks like

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-827: Expose logdirs total and usable space via Kafka API

Hi Colin, Thanks for the suggestion. I guess there are pros and cons with both methods. In my mind I'm expecting these values to always be there in the long run (once people have upgraded to brokers that support this feature). So I thought having a primitive directly may be nicer to use in the

Re: [VOTE] KIP-832 Allow creating a producer/consumer using a producer/consumer

+1 (binding) Thanks, François! -John On Tue, May 10, 2022, at 03:09, Bruno Cadonna wrote: > Hi Francois, > > Thanks for the KIP whose link is: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=211882578 > > +1 (binding) > > Best, > Bruno > > On 09.05.22 23:23, François Rosière

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-831: Add metric for log recovery progress

Hi James and all, I checked again and I can see when creating UnifiedLog, we expected the logs/indexes/snapshots are in good state. So, I don't think we should break the current design to expose the `RemainingBytesToRecovery` metric. If there is no other comments, I'll start a vote within this

Jenkins build is still unstable: Kafka » Kafka Branch Builder » trunk #919

See

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-832 Allow creating a producer/consumer using a producer/consumer config

Hi Francois, Thanks for the KIP! I sympathize with the issue you're facing and with John's reluctance to let perfect be the enemy of good, and if KIP freeze were tomorrow, I think this would be good enough. Given that we still have some time to work with, I'd like to propose an alternative

Build failed in Jenkins: Kafka » Kafka Branch Builder » 3.1 #119

See Changes: -- [...truncated 505500 lines...] [2022-05-10T12:44:18.193Z] [2022-05-10T12:44:18.193Z] KafkaZkClientTest > testGetTopicsAndPartitions() STARTED

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-13891) sync group failed with rebalanceInProgress error cause rebalance many rounds in coopeartive

Shawn Wang created KAFKA-13891: -- Summary: sync group failed with rebalanceInProgress error cause rebalance many rounds in coopeartive Key: KAFKA-13891 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-13891

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-830: Allow disabling JMX Reporter

Hi Ismael, The last option you suggested seems like a good tradeoff, I've updated the KIP to follow this idea. Thanks, Mickael On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 10:32 PM Ismael Juma wrote: > > The other option would be to add a deprecated config that then goes away in > AK 4.0. Something like

Jenkins build is still unstable: Kafka » Kafka Branch Builder » trunk #918

See

Jenkins build is still unstable: Kafka » Kafka Branch Builder » 3.1 #118

See

Re: [VOTE] KIP-832 Allow creating a producer/consumer using a producer/consumer

Hi Francois, Thanks for the KIP whose link is: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=211882578 +1 (binding) Best, Bruno On 09.05.22 23:23, François Rosière wrote:

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-834: Pause / Resume KafkaStreams Topologies

Hi Jim, Thanks for the KIP! I am fine with the KIP in general. However, I am with Sophie and John to also pause the standbys for the reasons they brought up. Is there a specific reason you want to keep standbys going? It feels like premature optimization to me. We can still add keeping

Re: Contributor access

Hi Jakub, I added you to the contributors in Jira. You are now able to assign tickets to yourself. Thank you for your interest in Apache Kafka! Best, Bruno On 10.05.22 00:22, Jakub Miroś wrote: Hello, I want to offer a help as a new contributor. Please add me to the Jira, my ID is