[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-14952) Publish metrics when source connector fails to poll data

Ravindranath Kakarla created KAFKA-14952: Summary: Publish metrics when source connector fails to poll data Key: KAFKA-14952 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-14952 Project:

Re: [DISCUSS] Adding non-committers as Github collaborators

Just to clarify, the re-triggering of Jenkins jobs would be controlled via the "jenkins: github_whitelist:" YAML section which we already made use of. I definitely agree that we should leverage this more to make it easy for collaborators to trigger builds. Regarding the 20 collaborators limit,

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-923: Add A Grace Period to Stream Table Join

HI Walker, thanks for the KIP! We definitely need this. I have two questions: - Have you considered allowing the customization of the underlying buffer implementation? As I can see, `StreamJoined` lets you customize the underlying store via a `WindowStoreSupplier`. Would it make sense for

Jenkins build is still unstable: Kafka » Kafka Branch Builder » trunk #1808

See

Re: Max Multi Tenancy topic naming - Cloudflare

Hello Everyone, I just wanted to bump this question. If this readily available information I apologized, if not I would love to capture it and add it to the documents. Kenneth On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 12:39 PM Kenneth Eversole wrote: > Hello, > > I am on the Kafka team at Cloudflare, and I

Re: [DISCUSS] Recommendations for managing long-running projects

Hi Kirk and David, Thanks for raising this, Kirk. David, to your questions, as I'm also contributing to the project: Do you expect the changes to come in incrementally, or as a few large patches? We try to limit the PR size as much as possible, but sometimes it is inevitably large... We could

Re: [DISCUSS] Adding non-committers as Github collaborators

Hi all, opinion from a regular person here: I think being able to re-trigger jenkin's test and tagging can be very helpful for a lot of times. On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 9:31 AM John Roesler wrote: > Hi all, > > This is a great suggestion! It seems like a really good way to make the > Apache Kafka

Re: [DISCUSS] Adding non-committers as Github collaborators

Hi all, This is a great suggestion! It seems like a really good way to make the Apache Kafka project more efficient in general and also smooth the path to committership. I've brought the topic up with the Apache Kafka PMC to consider adopting a policy around the "collaborator" rule. In the

Re: [DISCUSS] Adding non-committers as Github collaborators

I'm also a bit concerned by the 20 active collaborators rule. How do we pick the 20 people? Justine On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 8:36 AM Matthias J. Sax wrote: > In general I am +1 > > The only question I have is about > > > You may only have 20 active collaborators at any given time per >

Re: [DISCUSS] Adding non-committers as Github collaborators

In general I am +1 The only question I have is about You may only have 20 active collaborators at any given time per repository. Not sure if this is a concern or not? I would assume not, but wanted to bring it to everyone's attention. There is actually also a way to allow people to

[GitHub] [kafka-site] mjsax merged pull request #507: MINOR: update docs note about spurious stream-stream join results

mjsax merged PR #507: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/507 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Jenkins build is still unstable: Kafka » Kafka Branch Builder » trunk #1807

See

Re: [DISCUSS] Recommendations for managing long-running projects

Kirk, 1) I would check out the project management features built into GitHub, e.g., labels, milestones, and projects https://docs.github.com/en/issues/planning-and-tracking-with-projects/learning-about-projects/about-projects . 2) Ultimately, the contributions will need to follow the normal PR

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-872: Add Serializer#serializeToByteBuffer() to reduce memory copying

Thank you for your comment, Divij. 4. I have added JavaDoc for `ByteBufferSerializer#serializeToByteBuffer(String, ByteBuffer)` in the 'Public Interfaces' section, PTAL. Best, ShunKang Divij Vaidya 于2023年4月28日周五 21:06写道： > Thank you. I have a small nit otherwise the proposal looks good to

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-14951) Changing the cleanup.policy on an existing topic from "delete" to "compact" seems to change it to "compact,delete" even though it says "compact"

Tomasz Kaszuba created KAFKA-14951: -- Summary: Changing the cleanup.policy on an existing topic from "delete" to "compact" seems to change it to "compact,delete" even though it says "compact" Key: KAFKA-14951

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-872: Add Serializer#serializeToByteBuffer() to reduce memory copying

Thank you. I have a small nit otherwise the proposal looks good to me. 4. nit -> please add javadoc in the KIP as well since we are voting on KIP in this discussion thread and not on the PR. -- Divij Vaidya On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 1:28 PM ShunKang Lin wrote: > Thank you for your comment,

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 3.4.1 release

Hi, I've created a release plan for 3.4.1 in the wiki: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Release+plan+3.4.1 The release date will be in May 2023. Please take a look at the plan. This date is approximate at best and subject to change. Bug fix releases are driven both by the

Jenkins build is still unstable: Kafka » Kafka Branch Builder » trunk #1806

See

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-872: Add Serializer#serializeToByteBuffer() to reduce memory copying

Thank you for your comment, Divij. 4. I have added JavaDoc for `ByteBufferSerializer#serializeToByteBuffer(String, ByteBuffer)`, commit was here: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/12685/commits/a57e0a31c10a5ba49bc2e735b389188e6e071f62, PTAL. 6. I have added this description in the third

[jira] [Resolved] (KAFKA-14639) Kafka CooperativeStickyAssignor revokes/assigns partition in one rebalance cycle

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-14639?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Jacot resolved KAFKA-14639. - Fix Version/s: 3.5.0 Reviewer: David Jacot Resolution: Fixed > Kafka

Jenkins build is unstable: Kafka » Kafka Branch Builder » trunk #1805

See

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 3.5.0 release

Hi David, Yes you can backport these to 3.5. Let me know when you are done. Thanks, Mickael On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 9:02 PM David Arthur wrote: > > Hey Mickael, > > I have one major ZK migration improvement (KAFKA-14805) that landed in > trunk this week that I'd like to merge to 3.5 (once we

Re: [DISCUSS] Adding non-committers as Github collaborators

Hi David, That makes sense. I think that we have been doing this with a few folks. The more interesting question is how do we decide who could get added as a collaborator? Best, David On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 4:42 AM Luke Chen wrote: > Hi David, > > Thanks for the suggestion. I'm +1. > This is

Re: Adding reviewers with Github actions

Thanks, David. This is a nice addition! Coming back to the original proposal of using github actions, it may be possible to run David's script automatically. For instance, we could trigger an action which pulls the folks who have approved the PR and feed the script when a comment with `reviewers`