Re: [VOTE] KIP-852: Optimize calculation of size for log in remote tier

2023-07-01 Thread Kamal Chandraprakash
+1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP! — Kamal On Mon, 7 Nov 2022 at 2:20 AM, John Roesler wrote: > Hi Divij, > > Thanks for the KIP! > > I’ve read through your write-up, and it sounds reasonable to me. > > I’m +1 (binding) > > Thanks, > John > > On Tue, Nov 1, 2022, at 05:03, Divij Vaidya

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-15141) High CPU usage with log4j2

2023-07-01 Thread Gaurav Narula (Jira)
Gaurav Narula created KAFKA-15141: - Summary: High CPU usage with log4j2 Key: KAFKA-15141 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-15141 Project: Kafka Issue Type: Improvement

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-15140) Improve TopicCommandIntegrationTest to be less flaky

2023-07-01 Thread Divij Vaidya (Jira)
Divij Vaidya created KAFKA-15140: Summary: Improve TopicCommandIntegrationTest to be less flaky Key: KAFKA-15140 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-15140 Project: Kafka Issue

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-852 Optimize calculation of size for log in remote tier

2023-07-01 Thread Divij Vaidya
Thank you folks for reviewing this KIP. Satish, I have modified the motivation to make it more clear. Now it says, "Since the main feature of tiered storage is storing a large amount of data, we expect num_remote_segments to be large. A frequent linear scan (i.e. listing all segment metadata)

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-933 Publish metrics when source connector fails to poll data

2023-07-01 Thread Ravindra Nath Kakarla
Thanks for reviewing and providing the feedback. > 1) Does it make sense to drop the *record *part from the metric name as it doesn't seem to serve much purpose? I would rather call the metric as *source-poll-errors-total Yes, "records" is not needed and misleading. > Staying on names, I am

Re: Apache Kafka 3.6.0 release

2023-07-01 Thread Satish Duggana
Hi Christo, Please feel free to add the KIP to the release plan wiki with the implementation status. Thanks, Satish. On Fri, 30 Jun 2023 at 21:59, Christo Lolov wrote: > > Hello! > > I will add KIP-902 to the release plan. I would appreciate a few more > reviews on the pull request

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-932: Queues for Kafka

2023-07-01 Thread Kamal Chandraprakash
Hi Andrew, Thank you for the KIP -- interesting read. I have some questions: 101. "The calls to KafkaConsumer.acknowledge(ConsumerRecord, AcknowledgeType) must be issued in the order in which the records appear in the ConsumerRecords object, which will be in order of increasing offset for each

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-892: Transactional Semantics for StateStores

2023-07-01 Thread Nick Telford
Hi everyone, I've begun performance testing my branch on our staging environment, putting it through its paces in our non-trivial application. I'm already observing the same increased flush rate that we saw the last time we attempted to use a version of this KIP, but this time, I think I know

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-15139) Optimize the performance of `Set.removeAll(List)` in `MirrorCheckpointConnector`

2023-07-01 Thread hudeqi (Jira)
hudeqi created KAFKA-15139: -- Summary: Optimize the performance of `Set.removeAll(List)` in `MirrorCheckpointConnector` Key: KAFKA-15139 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-15139 Project: Kafka