Re: [VOTE] KIP-1013: Drop broker and tools support for Java 11 in Kafka 4.0 (deprecate in 3.7)

+1 (non-binding). On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 8:01 AM Satish Duggana wrote: > Thanks Ismael for the proposal. > > Adopting JDK 17 enhances developer productivity and has reached a > level of maturity that has led to its adoption by several other major > projects, signifying its reliability and

[jira] [Resolved] (KAFKA-16034) AsyncKafkaConsumer will get Invalid Request error when trying to rejoin on fenced/unknown member Id

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-16034?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Phuc Hong Tran resolved KAFKA-16034. Resolution: Fixed > AsyncKafkaConsumer will get Invalid Request error when trying to

Jenkins build is still unstable: Kafka » Kafka Branch Builder » trunk #2531

See

Jenkins build is unstable: Kafka » Kafka Branch Builder » 3.7 #45

See

Re: [VOTE] KIP-1013: Drop broker and tools support for Java 11 in Kafka 4.0 (deprecate in 3.7)

Thanks Ismael for the proposal. Adopting JDK 17 enhances developer productivity and has reached a level of maturity that has led to its adoption by several other major projects, signifying its reliability and effectiveness. +1 (binding) ~Satish. On Wed, 3 Jan 2024 at 06:59, Justine Olshan

Re: [VOTE] KIP-1013: Drop broker and tools support for Java 11 in Kafka 4.0 (deprecate in 3.7)

Thanks for driving this. +1 (binding) from me. Justine On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 4:30 PM Ismael Juma wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to start a vote on KIP-1013. > > As stated in the discussion thread, this KIP was proposed after the KIP > freeze for Apache Kafka 3.7, but it is purely a

[VOTE] KIP-1013: Drop broker and tools support for Java 11 in Kafka 4.0 (deprecate in 3.7)

Hi all, I would like to start a vote on KIP-1013. As stated in the discussion thread, this KIP was proposed after the KIP freeze for Apache Kafka 3.7, but it is purely a documentation update (if we decide to adopt it) and I believe it would serve our users best if we communicate the deprecation

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-1013: Drop broker and tools support for Java 11 in Kafka 4.0 (deprecate in 3.7)

It seems like people are generally in favor, I'll start a vote thread. Ismael On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 10:39 AM Ismael Juma wrote: > Hi all, > > I was watching the Java Highlights of 2023 from Nicolai Parlog[1] and it > became clear that many projects are moving to Java 17 for its developer >

Re: [Question] About Kafka producer design decision making

I should also clarify that Chia-Ping took it over from me originally and improved the proposal significantly. I think he also got busy and hasn't been able to spend time on it for a while though. Ismael On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 4:08 PM Ismael Juma wrote: > I had written a KIP a while back: > >

Re: [Question] About Kafka producer design decision making

I had written a KIP a while back: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=100829459 Happy for someone to pick it up and drive it forward. Ismael On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 2:00 PM Justine Olshan wrote: > Hey folks -- > I think this is a good conversation. Given we plan

Jenkins build is still unstable: Kafka » Kafka Branch Builder » trunk #2530

See

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-16076) RestClient Interrupting the thread in case of InterruptedException

Mehrdad Karami created KAFKA-16076: -- Summary: RestClient Interrupting the thread in case of InterruptedException Key: KAFKA-16076 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-16076 Project:

Build failed in Jenkins: Kafka » Kafka Branch Builder » 3.7 #44

See Changes: -- [...truncated 453933 lines...] Gradle Test Run :streams:test > Gradle Test Executor 90 > DefaultTaskExecutorTest > shouldClearTaskTimeoutOnProcessed() PASSED

Re: [Question] About Kafka producer design decision making

Hey folks -- I think this is a good conversation. Given we plan to drop support for Java 8 in 4.0 this seems like a good time to consider this change. Perhaps we should file a JIRA ticket and maybe create a KIP to discuss? One thing we should consider however, is if we want some of these

Re: [Question] About Kafka producer design decision making

hey sean - a lot of uses of the Futures are in the public API and therefore take voting/effort to be changed. i don't know any reason for intentionally avoiding the use of CompletableFuture, however, others might know more than I do. thanks, P On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 1:27 AM 신수웅(Sean Sin)

Re: [DISCUSS] Kafka distributed transaction support

I believe Artem also had some conversations offline about XA. If I recall correctly, he didn't plan to include it in KIP-939 but was happy to leave room for potential KIPs in the future. Please feel free to continue the conversation on the thread. :) Justine On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 12:05 PM Greg

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-16075) TLS configuration not validated in KRaft controller-only nodes

Jakub Scholz created KAFKA-16075: Summary: TLS configuration not validated in KRaft controller-only nodes Key: KAFKA-16075 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-16075 Project: Kafka

Re: [DISCUSS] Kafka distributed transaction support

Hi Rowland, First of all, welcome to the community, and thanks for thinking about the future of Kafka! I'm not very familiar with X/Open XA, but from the documentation I read, it appears most related to KIP-939: Support Participation in 2PC [1] currently in-progress. You may be interested in

Re: [VOTE] KIP-1004: Enforce tasks.max property in Kafka Connect

+1 (non-binding) Thanks Chris! From: dev@kafka.apache.org At: 01/02/24 11:49:18 UTC-5:00To: dev@kafka.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-1004: Enforce tasks.max property in Kafka Connect Hi all, Happy New Year! Wanted to give this a bump now that the holidays are over for a lot of us.

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-891: Running multiple versions of a connector.

Hi Snehashis, Thank you for the KIP! This is something I've wanted for a long time. I know the discussion has gone cold, are you still interested in pursuing this feature? I'll make time to review the KIP if you are still accepting comments. Thanks, Greg On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 12:29 PM

Jenkins build is still unstable: Kafka » Kafka Branch Builder » trunk #2529

See

Re: Apache Kafka 3.7.0 Release

Hello Stan, I wanted to give you a heads up that https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15073 ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-16046) was identified as a blocker regression and should be merged to trunk by EOD. Cheers, Almog On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 4:20 AM Stanislav Kozlovski wrote:

[jira] [Reopened] (KAFKA-16046) Stream Stream Joins fail after restoration with deserialization exceptions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-16046?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Almog Gavra reopened KAFKA-16046: - > Stream Stream Joins fail after restoration with deserialization exceptions >

Jenkins build is still unstable: Kafka » Kafka Branch Builder » 3.7 #43

See

Re: [VOTE] KIP-1004: Enforce tasks.max property in Kafka Connect

Hi all, Happy New Year! Wanted to give this a bump now that the holidays are over for a lot of us. Looking forward to people's thoughts! Cheers, Chris On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 10:36 AM Chris Egerton wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to call for a vote on KIP-1004, which adds enforcement for the >

Jenkins build is still unstable: Kafka » Kafka Branch Builder » trunk #2528

See

Re: Kafka trunk test & build stability

Addendum: I've opened a PR with what I believe are the changes necessary to enable Remote Build Caching, if you choose to go that route: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15109 On Tue, 2 Jan 2024 at 14:31, Nick Telford wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Regarding building a "dependency graph"...

Re: Kafka trunk test & build stability

Hi everyone, Regarding building a "dependency graph"... Gradle already has this information, albeit fairly coarse-grained. You might be able to get some considerable improvement by configuring the Gradle Remote Build Cache. It looks like it's currently disabled explicitly:

Re: Kafka trunk test & build stability

Thanks for all the work that has already been done on this in the past days! Have we considered running our test suite with -XX:+HeapDumpOnOutOfMemoryError and uploading the heap dumps as Jenkins build artifacts? This could speed up debugging. Even if we store them only for a day and do it only

Re: Contributor permissions

Thanks Justine! On Mon, Jan 1, 2024 at 8:24 AM Justine Olshan wrote: > It is also possible the name you chose was already taken. I have emailed > infra to clarify. > > On Mon, Jan 1, 2024 at 8:19 AM Justine Olshan > wrote: > > > Hey Aadithya, > > > > I saw your request and tried to approve it

Re: Apache Kafka 3.7.0 Release

Hi Apoorv, Thanks for taking ownership and looking into this! One more caveat is that I believe this first publish is ran with JDK 8, as the release.py runs with both JDK 8 and (if I recall correctly) 17 versions. This seems to fail on the first one - so JDK 8. Not sure if that is related in any

Re: [DISCUSS] Kafka distributed transaction support

Hi Rowland, KIP-939 https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-939%3A+Support+Participation+in+2PC introduces two-phase commit, but not XA support. I believe the KIP is expected to be delivered in Kafka 4.0 later this year. The way that it works and the use cases that it’s intended

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-16074) Fix thread leaks in ReplicaManagerTest

Divij Vaidya created KAFKA-16074: Summary: Fix thread leaks in ReplicaManagerTest Key: KAFKA-16074 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-16074 Project: Kafka Issue Type: Sub-task

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-1005: Add EarliestLocalOffset to GetOffsetShell

Thanks for the KIP Christo. The shell command that you mentioned calls ListOffsets API internally. Hence, I believe that we would be making a public interface change (and a version bump) to ListOffsetsAPI as well to include -5? If yes, can you please add that information to the change in public

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Kafka PMC Member: Divij Vaidya

Congrats! On 12/29/23 9:40 AM, Viktor Somogyi-Vass wrote: Congrats Divij, well deserved! On Fri, Dec 29, 2023, 09:36 Lucas Brutschy wrote: Congratulations, Divij! On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 1:32 AM Colin McCabe wrote: Congratulations, Divij! best, Colin On Thu, Dec 28, 2023, at 11:38,

Re: [DISCUSS] Connect Jira component name

SGTM. I found it always odd that it's named `KafkaConnect` :) -Matthias On 12/26/23 6:03 PM, Greg Harris wrote: Hi Connect Developers, I noticed recently that we had two Jira components: "KafkaConnect" and "connect", one with >1000 issues and one with 20 issues. I merged the two tags,