Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-1012: The need for a Kafka 3.8.x release

Hi all, Copying here the same message as in the VOTE thread just in case someone is not following it (yet). "*Thanks for your comments,* *I reworded some parts of the KIP to express that:* *- The KIP is to agree that we need at least one more minor version in the 3.x series* *- Explicitly saying

Re: [VOTE] KIP-1012: The need for a Kafka 3.8.x release

Hi all, Thanks for your comments, I reworded some parts of the KIP to express that: - The KIP is to agree that we need at least one more minor version in the 3.x series - Explicitly saying that the list of KIPs is not exhaustive and that if some are not done, we would need another minor version -

Re: [VOTE] KIP-1007: Introduce Remote Storage Not Ready Exception

Thank you for all the votes! I'm closing the vote thread as it is open for more than 72 hours. The KIP has been passed with 3 binding and 1 non-binding votes. -- Kamal On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 5:51 PM Satish Duggana wrote: > Thanks Kamal for the KIP. > > +1 (binding) > > On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 at

Re: Apache Kafka 3.7.0 Release

Hi Colin, Thanks for the response. The only reason for asking the question of publishing the metadata is because that's present in previous client releases. For more context, the description of PR holds the details and waiting for the confirmation there