Re: [DISCUSS] Different retention semantics for active segment rotation

2024-03-21 Thread Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya
Sure! good to know that is tracked. Thanks, Luke! On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 at 07:52, Luke Chen wrote: > Hi Jorge, > > You should check the JIRA: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-16385 > where we had some discussion. > Welcome to provide your thoughts there. > > Thanks. > Luke > > On

Re: [DISCUSS] Different retention semantics for active segment rotation

2024-03-21 Thread Luke Chen
Hi Jorge, You should check the JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-16385 where we had some discussion. Welcome to provide your thoughts there. Thanks. Luke On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 3:33 PM Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya < quilcate.jo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi dev community, > > I'd

[DISCUSS] Different retention semantics for active segment rotation

2024-03-21 Thread Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya
Hi dev community, I'd like to share some findings on how rotation of active segment differ depending on whether topic retention is time- or size-based. I was (wrongly) under the assumption that active segments are only rotated when segment configs (segment.bytes (1GiB) or segment.ms (7d)) or