ng a new
> > boolean
> > > > > > parameter to the performAssignment(...) method? The reason I ask
> > is because
> > > > > > I raised KIP-795 a few weeks back, which aims to add a public API
> > for
> > > > > > AbstractCoordinator, which might ch
tor, which might change (or not) with this KIP.
> > > > >
> > > > > I see you also mentioned there's some discussions regarding a new
> consumer
> > > > > protocol. Is this being discussed somewhere else? I'm curious to
> know how
> > > >
> > > > how
> > > > would it work with other systems (like Kafka Connect or Schema Registry)
> > > > that rely on the rebalance protocol to handle resource assignments.
> > > >
> > > > Apologies in advance if these questions a
ource assignments.
> > >
> > > Apologies in advance if these questions are off-topic for the discussion
> > > at hand.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Hector
> > >
> > > From: dev@kafka.apache.org At: 01/24/22 09:08:58 UTC-5:00To:
>
gards,
> > Hector
> >
> > From: dev@kafka.apache.org At: 01/24/22 09:08:58 UTC-5:00To:
> > dev@kafka.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-814: Static membership protocol should let the
> > leader skip assignment
> >
> > Hey Jason,
> >
> >
From: dev@kafka.apache.org At: 01/24/22 09:08:58 UTC-5:00To:
> dev@kafka.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-814: Static membership protocol should let the
> leader skip assignment
>
> Hey Jason,
>
> Thanks for your comments.
>
> Regarding your first point. Yes,
on
the rebalance protocol to handle resource assignments.
Apologies in advance if these questions are off-topic for the discussion at
hand.
Regards,
Hector
From: dev@kafka.apache.org At: 01/24/22 09:08:58 UTC-5:00To:
dev@kafka.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-814: Static membership protocol
Hey Jason,
Thanks for your comments.
Regarding your first point. Yes, you have it right. Let me complement
the KIP to be clearer.
Regarding your second point. That is right. New partitions would not
be detected while the leader is down. It is definitely not ideal but that
seems acceptable to
Hey David,
Thanks for the proposal. This was a tricky bug and I think your approach is
probably the best way forward.
It would be helpful to add a little more detail to the proposal. When the
coordinator detects that the static leader is returning, it will set
`skipAssignment` to true in the
Hi folks,
I'd like to start a discussion for KIP-814: Static membership protocol
should let the
leader skip assignment. This is a small extension to the static
membership protocol
to address KAFKA-13435.
The KIP is here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/C5-kCw.
Please let me know what you
10 matches
Mail list logo
