mjsax commented on PR #528:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/528#issuecomment-1648602694
Follow up PR to get the latest comments back ported to `kafka.git`:
https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/14085
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
mjsax commented on PR #528:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/528#issuecomment-1642653614
@mimaison @divijvaidya @ijuma @forlack
Updated this PR, including the changes of
https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/14031
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
mjsax commented on PR #528:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/528#issuecomment-1639047530
We got a PR for the ZK section: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/14031
In case you want to take a look.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond
mjsax commented on PR #528:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/528#issuecomment-1607861293
@mimaison @ijuma @divijvaidya -- any thoughts? Would not nice to move this
forward.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
mjsax commented on PR #528:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/528#issuecomment-1601987494
Haha. This "escalated" quickly 藍
I agree with everything discussed. I only don't understand
> Kraft production readiness is an independent topic than Zk deprecation.
To
