Re: [VOTE] KIP-1007: Introduce Remote Storage Not Ready Exception

Hi all, While testing the patch [1], realised that introducing a new REMOTE_STORAGE_NOT_READY error-code is not compatible with the consumer. Consumer does not retry the FETCH request for all the retriable exceptions [2] instead it retries only for specific error codes. Dropping the KIP-1007

Re: [VOTE] KIP-1007: Introduce Remote Storage Not Ready Exception

Thank you for all the votes! I'm closing the vote thread as it is open for more than 72 hours. The KIP has been passed with 3 binding and 1 non-binding votes. -- Kamal On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 5:51 PM Satish Duggana wrote: > Thanks Kamal for the KIP. > > +1 (binding) > > On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 at

Re: [VOTE] KIP-1007: Introduce Remote Storage Not Ready Exception

Thanks Kamal for the KIP. +1 (binding) On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 at 17:04, Divij Vaidya wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > -- > Divij Vaidya > > > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 10:30 AM Luke Chen wrote: > > > Hi Kamal, > > > > Thanks for the KIP. > > +1 (binding) from me. > > > > Luke > > > > On Thu, Dec 21,

Re: [VOTE] KIP-1007: Introduce Remote Storage Not Ready Exception

+1 (binding) -- Divij Vaidya On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 10:30 AM Luke Chen wrote: > Hi Kamal, > > Thanks for the KIP. > +1 (binding) from me. > > Luke > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 4:51 PM Christo Lolov > wrote: > > > Heya Kamal, > > > > The proposed change makes sense to me as it will be a more

Re: [VOTE] KIP-1007: Introduce Remote Storage Not Ready Exception

Hi Kamal, Thanks for the KIP. +1 (binding) from me. Luke On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 4:51 PM Christo Lolov wrote: > Heya Kamal, > > The proposed change makes sense to me as it will be a more explicit > behaviour than what Kafka does today - I am happy with it! > > +1 (non-binding) from me > >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-1007: Introduce Remote Storage Not Ready Exception

Heya Kamal, The proposed change makes sense to me as it will be a more explicit behaviour than what Kafka does today - I am happy with it! +1 (non-binding) from me Best, Christo On Tue, 12 Dec 2023 at 09:01, Kamal Chandraprakash < kamal.chandraprak...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I would like

[VOTE] KIP-1007: Introduce Remote Storage Not Ready Exception

Hi, I would like to call a vote for KIP-1007 . This KIP aims to introduce a new error code for retriable remote storage errors. Thanks to everyone who reviewed the KIP! -- Kamal