Re: [VOTE] KIP-852: Optimize calculation of size for log in remote tier

2023-07-18 Thread Divij Vaidya
Thank you everyone for your participation. The KIP is accepted and vote is now closed with: 3 binding votes (Satish, Luke, John) 2 non-binding votes (Kamal, Jorge) -- Divij Vaidya On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 1:04 PM Satish Duggana wrote: > +1 > Thanks Divij for addressing the comments in the

Re: [VOTE] KIP-852: Optimize calculation of size for log in remote tier

2023-07-18 Thread Satish Duggana
+1 Thanks Divij for addressing the comments in the KIP. LGTM. ~Satish. On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 at 18:10, Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks for the KIP! > > Jorge. > > On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 at 12:26, Luke Chen wrote: > > > +1 (binding) from me. > > > > Thanks for

Re: [VOTE] KIP-852: Optimize calculation of size for log in remote tier

2023-07-13 Thread Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya
+1 (non-binding) Thanks for the KIP! Jorge. On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 at 12:26, Luke Chen wrote: > +1 (binding) from me. > > Thanks for the KIP! > > Luke > > On Sun, Jul 2, 2023 at 11:49 AM Kamal Chandraprakash < > kamal.chandraprak...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP! >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-852: Optimize calculation of size for log in remote tier

2023-07-13 Thread Luke Chen
+1 (binding) from me. Thanks for the KIP! Luke On Sun, Jul 2, 2023 at 11:49 AM Kamal Chandraprakash < kamal.chandraprak...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP! > > — > Kamal > > On Mon, 7 Nov 2022 at 2:20 AM, John Roesler wrote: > > > Hi Divij, > > > > Thanks for the KIP!

Re: [VOTE] KIP-852: Optimize calculation of size for log in remote tier

2023-07-01 Thread Kamal Chandraprakash
+1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP! — Kamal On Mon, 7 Nov 2022 at 2:20 AM, John Roesler wrote: > Hi Divij, > > Thanks for the KIP! > > I’ve read through your write-up, and it sounds reasonable to me. > > I’m +1 (binding) > > Thanks, > John > > On Tue, Nov 1, 2022, at 05:03, Divij Vaidya

Re: [VOTE] KIP-852: Optimize calculation of size for log in remote tier

2022-11-06 Thread John Roesler
Hi Divij, Thanks for the KIP! I’ve read through your write-up, and it sounds reasonable to me. I’m +1 (binding) Thanks, John On Tue, Nov 1, 2022, at 05:03, Divij Vaidya wrote: > Hey folks > > The discuss thread for this KIP has been open for a few months with no > concerns being surfaced. I

[VOTE] KIP-852: Optimize calculation of size for log in remote tier

2022-11-01 Thread Divij Vaidya
Hey folks The discuss thread for this KIP has been open for a few months with no concerns being surfaced. I would like to start a vote for the implementation of this KIP. The KIP is available at