Re: [VOTE] KIP-941 Range queries to accept null lower and upper bounds

Hi all, Thanks to everyone who participated in the voting and the discussion. I'll close it since it has been open for over 72 hours, and we have sufficient votes. KIP-941 has been accepted with the following +1 votes (and no +0 or -1 votes): - Sophie Blee-Goldman (binding) - Matthias J. Sax

Re: [VOTE] KIP-941 Range queries to accept null lower and upper bounds

Thanks for the KIP! +1 (binding) On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 4:30 PM Matthias J. Sax wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On 7/10/23 12:13 PM, Bill Bejeck wrote: > > Hi Lucia, > > > > Thanks for the KIP! It will be a welcomed improvement. > > > > +1(binding) > > > > -Bill > > > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 2:40 

Re: [VOTE] KIP-941 Range queries to accept null lower and upper bounds

+1 (binding) On 7/10/23 12:13 PM, Bill Bejeck wrote: Hi Lucia, Thanks for the KIP! It will be a welcomed improvement. +1(binding) -Bill On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 2:40 PM Lucia Cerchie wrote: Hello everyone, I'd like to call a vote on KIP-941 <

Re: [VOTE] KIP-941 Range queries to accept null lower and upper bounds

Hi Lucia, Thanks for the KIP! It will be a welcomed improvement. +1(binding) -Bill On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 2:40 PM Lucia Cerchie wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I'd like to call a vote on KIP-941 > < >

[VOTE] KIP-941 Range queries to accept null lower and upper bounds

Hello everyone, I'd like to call a vote on KIP-941 . It has been under discussion since June 26, and has received edits to the KIP and approval by discussion participants. Best,