+1 (binding).
Thanks!
--Vahid
On Tue, Nov 21, 2023, 1:00 AM Qichao Chu wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> It would be nice if we could have more people to review and vote for this
> KIP.
> Many thanks!
>
> Qichao
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 2:43 PM Qichao Chu wrote:
>
> > @Matthias: yeah it should be
Hi All,
It would be nice if we could have more people to review and vote for this
KIP.
Many thanks!
Qichao
On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 2:43 PM Qichao Chu wrote:
> @Matthias: yeah it should be 977, sorry for the confusion.
> Btw, do you want to cast another binding vote for it?
>
> Best,
> Qichao
@Matthias: yeah it should be 977, sorry for the confusion.
Btw, do you want to cast another binding vote for it?
Best,
Qichao Chu
On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 12:45 AM Matthias J. Sax wrote:
> This is KIP-977, right? Not as the subject says.
>
> Guess we won't be able to fix this now. Hope it does
This is KIP-977, right? Not as the subject says.
Guess we won't be able to fix this now. Hope it does not cause confusion
down the line...
-Matthias
On 11/16/23 4:43 AM, Kamal Chandraprakash wrote:
+1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP!
On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 9:00 AM Satish Duggana
+1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP!
On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 9:00 AM Satish Duggana
wrote:
> Thanks Qichao for the KIP.
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> ~Satish.
>
> On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 at 02:20, Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya
> wrote:
> >
> > Qichao, thanks again for leading this proposal!
> >
> > +1
Thanks Qichao for the KIP.
+1 (binding)
~Satish.
On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 at 02:20, Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya
wrote:
>
> Qichao, thanks again for leading this proposal!
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Cheers,
> Jorge.
>
> On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 at 19:17, Divij Vaidya wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > I
Qichao, thanks again for leading this proposal!
+1 (non-binding)
Cheers,
Jorge.
On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 at 19:17, Divij Vaidya wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> I was involved in the discussion thread for this KIP and support it in its
> current form.
>
> --
> Divij Vaidya
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at
+1 (binding)
I was involved in the discussion thread for this KIP and support it in its
current form.
--
Divij Vaidya
On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 10:55 AM Qichao Chu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to call a vote for KIP-977: Partition-Level Throughput Metrics.
>
> Please take a look here:
>
>
Hi all,
I'd like to call a vote for KIP-977: Partition-Level Throughput Metrics.
Please take a look here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-977%3A+Partition-Level+Throughput+Metrics
Best,
Qichao Chu
