username is "GFriedrich".
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Kind regards
> Georg Friedrich
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: Ryanne Dolan
> Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2021 3:46 PM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: MirrorMaker 2.0 - Offset Sync - Questions/Improveme
> Georg Friedrich
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ryanne Dolan
> Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2021 3:46 PM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: MirrorMaker 2.0 - Offset Sync - Questions/Improvements
>
> I am not certain, but I'd guess a KIP is not required. I think this would b
ubject: Re: MirrorMaker 2.0 - Offset Sync - Questions/Improvements
I am not certain, but I'd guess a KIP is not required. I think this would be
considered a bug fix.
Ryanne
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021, 5:34 PM Georg Friedrich
wrote:
> Hi Ryanne,
>
> thank you for your response.
>
> 1)
gt;
> Kind regards
> Georg Friedrich
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ryanne Dolan
> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2021 4:57 AM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: MirrorMaker 2.0 - Offset Sync - Questions/Improvements
>
> Georg, sorry for the delay, but hopefully I can still
, but for people relying on the
fact that those topics are always created this may look different.
Kind regards
Georg Friedrich
-Original Message-
From: Ryanne Dolan
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2021 4:57 AM
To: dev
Subject: Re: MirrorMaker 2.0 - Offset Sync - Questions/Improvements
Georg, sorry
Georg, sorry for the delay, but hopefully I can still help.
1) I think the detail you're missing is that the offset syncs are very
sparse. Normally, you only get a new sync when the Connector first starts
running. You are right that it is possible for a consumer to lag behind the
most recent
Hi,
recently I've started to look deeper into the code of MirrorMaker 2.0 and was
faced with some confusing details. Maybe you can point me into a right
direction here.
* The line at
