Hi Pankaj,
Do you notice any errors in kafka logs when your consumer
stops reading data. Attaching those logs would be helpful in
finding the issue.
-Harsha
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014, at 06:12 AM, pankaj ojha wrote:
Hi Team,
Can you please provide any information
might have experience this issue
before.
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014, at 06:54 AM, pankaj ojha wrote:
Hi Harsha,
Thank you for replying.
There is no error in the kafka logs. The output I had pasted in my
previous
mail is from kafka logs only.
But when I restart the kafka process after incrementing
. If there is any interest in the above projects
from the community I am hoping to work on documentation and the
code as there isn't much activity happened on these projects.
Thanks,
Harsha
Hi Joe,
I am interested in joining the efforts. I went through apache
storm security with kerberos so I can bring some of that
experience into the discussion.
Thanks,
Harsha
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014, at 10:37 AM, Joe Stein wrote:
Hi Andrew, yes the meeting took place and we
Hi All,
Do we have any ballpark date on the release of 0.8.1.2 or 0.8.2.
Thanks,
Harsha
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014, at 03:53 PM, Jay Kreps wrote:
I agree that a beta for 0.8.2 would be useful. It would also be good
to get it in production at LinkedIn before the final version.
Sorry about
+1 for Web Api
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014, at 11:48 PM, Glen Mazza wrote:
Apache Karaf has been doing this for quite a few years, albeit in Java
not Scala. Still, their coding approach to creating a CLI probably
captures many lessons learned over that time.
Glen
On 10/17/2014 08:03 PM, Joe
Congrats Guozhang
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014, at 04:31 PM, Joe Stein wrote:
Congrats!!!
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 7:05 PM, Neha Narkhede neha.narkh...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm very happy to announce that the Kafka PMC has invited Guozhang Wang to
become a committer. Guozhang has
If you want to separate your main application from producer logic you
can use or write something similar to
https://github.com/mozilla-metrics/bagheera . Basically have a service
that provides an REST api which your main application can call and has a
Kafkaproducer to write to kafka.
-Harsha
Any reason not to go with apache curator http://curator.apache.org/ .
-Harsha
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015, at 09:55 PM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
I am also +1 on Neha's suggestion that At some point, if we find
ourselves
fiddling too much with ZkClient, it wouldn't hurt to write our own little
zookeeper
curator handles sasl connection
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1695
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015, at 06:10 AM, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
FWIW - the ZkClient project team have merged the pull request that I had
submitted to allow for timeouts to operations
for contributors if its lazy as in no
strong objections .
Just to make sure this is only for KIPs not for regular bug fixes right?
Thanks,
Harsha
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015, at 05:59 PM, Jiangjie Qin wrote:
I¹m having an impression that KIP is mostly for new features but not for
bug fixes. But I
I don't see any failures in tests with the latest trunk or 0.8.2. I ran
it few times in a loop.
-Harsha
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015, at 08:38 AM, Manikumar Reddy wrote:
ProducerFailureHandlingTest.testCannotSendToInternalTopic is failing on
both 0.8.2 and trunk.
Error on 0.8.2
of these
test failure cases.
If you can reproduce this or even intermittent test failure can you
please open up a new JIRA and attach your patch there.
Your review patch is attached KAFKA-1867 which is a different issue.
Thanks,
Harsha
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015, at 07:16 AM, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
I could reproduce
the work is in progress. I'll update the
thread with a initial prototype patch.
Thanks,
Harsha
the work is in progress. I'll update the
thread with a initial prototype patch.
Thanks,
Harsha
Hi Parth,
Thanks for putting this together. Overall it looks good to
me. Although AdminUtils is a concern KIP-4 can probably fix
that part.
Thanks,
Harsha
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015, at 10:39 AM, Parth Brahmbhatt wrote:
Forgot to add links to wiki and jira.
Link
I would like to include ssl/sasl
1) Kafka-1684 (Patch posted for a review)
2) Kafka-1686 (Patch depends on kafka-1684)
3) Kafka-1688 (work is in progress)
Thanks,
Harsha
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015, at 04:35 AM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
Gwen,
Just for clarification, you were suggesting we should
improvement to the controlled shutdown especially in case of having high
partitions per broker which might degrade the performance as per the JIRA.
Thanks,
Harsha
On March 25, 2015 at 11:15:21 AM, Mingjie Lai (m...@apache.org) wrote:
Hi.
I've been trying to figure out the best way to do kafka broker
if a producer doesn’t want
to provide client auth and just needs wire encryption there won’t be any
identity , in this case and we won’t be able to enforce an authorizer as the
client will be anonymous.
--
Harsha
On March 31, 2015 at 10:29:33 AM, Don Bosco Durai (bo...@apache.org) wrote:
Related
on the
framework side than on the system tests but in evaluating
frameworks can we consider windows as another option too?.
Thanks,
Harsha
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015, at 01:02 PM, Geoffrey Anderson wrote:
Hi Gwen,
Sorry about that, the ducttape repository was not yet public, but now
+1
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015, at 01:37 PM, Neha Narkhede wrote:
Would anyone object if I commented out the kafka.api.ConsumerTest out
until
it is fixed? It hangs and is making accepting patches very
time-consuming.
--
Thanks,
Neha
+1 non-binding
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015, at 12:39 PM, Jeff Holoman wrote:
+1 non-binding of course
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Joe Stein joe.st...@stealth.ly wrote:
+1
~ Joe Stein
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
http://www.stealth.ly
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
On
+1 unit tests and ran tests on 3-node cluster.
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015, at 09:01 PM, Neha Narkhede wrote:
+1. Verified quick start, unit tests.
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Joe Stein joe.st...@stealth.ly wrote:
Ok, lets fix the transient test failure on trunk agreed not a blocker.
+1
Congrats!
-Harsha
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015, at 11:20 AM, Sriram Subramanian wrote:
Congratulations!
On 2/25/15 11:15 AM, Joe Stein joe.st...@stealth.ly wrote:
Awesome!
The future of schema management, has arrived
~ Joestein
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Gwen Shapira gshap
Hi,
Reviewboard looks good to me. Can you paste the link to
reviewboard on the JIRA.
-Harsha
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015, at 07:11 AM, Jonathan Rafalski wrote:
Hello,
I am working through getting the python script for the review
process working but wanted to get this first patch up
Gianmarco,
I am coming from storm community. I think PKG is a very
interesting and we can provide an implementation of Partitioner for PKG. Can
you open a JIRA for this.
--
Harsha
Sent with Airmail
On April 3, 2015 at 4:49:15 AM, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales
(g
Thanks for the review Joel. I agree don't need a init method we can use
configure. I'll update the KIP.
-Harsha
On Wed, May 6, 2015, at 04:45 PM, Joel Koshy wrote:
+1 with a minor comment: do we need an init method given it extends
Configurable?
Also, can you move this wiki out of drafts
+1 non-binding
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 9:18 AM -0700, Parth Brahmbhatt
pbrahmbh...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Hi,
Opening the voting thread for KIP-11.
Link to the KIP:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-11+-+Authorization+Interface
Link to Jira:
potential MITM. This
api doesn't exist in Java 1.6.
Are there any users still want 1.6 support or can we stop supporting 1.6
from next release on wards.
Thanks,
Harsha
- 20150711_01 based on Oracle jdk8u51-b15
Thanks, Harsha
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015, at 01:52 PM, Rajini Sivaram wrote:
Harsha,
I am using the code from
https://github.com/harshach/kafka/tree/KAFKA-1690-V1 with the latest
commit on 25 July which I think corresponds to the latest patch in KAFKA-
1690
one of the benefits of keeping conversations in mailing lists is it can
be searchable later. It will benefit users who might seen the same error
which was answered on the mailing lists before. slack/glitter can do
that?
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015, at 09:59 PM, Gwen Shapira wrote:
FYI:
Joining Slack
Jaikiran,
Here is the SSL setup doc
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Deploying+SSL+for+Kafka
.
I am going to write one for SASL ( kerberos ) soon and Parth is working
on pushing one for Authorizer as well.
Thanks,
Harsha
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015, at 04:42
+1 (binding)
1. ran unit tests
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015, at 06:28 PM, Jun Rao wrote:
> This is the second candidate for release of Apache Kafka 0.9.0.0. This a
> major release that includes (1) authentication (through SSL and SASL) and
> authorization, (2) a new java consumer, (3) a Kafka connect
+1 (binding)
1. ran unit tests
2. ran simple tests (producer, consumer) with sasl, ssl and non-secure.
Thanks,
Harsha
On Sat, Nov 14, 2015, at 02:42 PM, Harsha wrote:
> +1 (binding)
> 1. ran unit tests
>
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015, at 06:28 PM, Jun Rao wrote:
> > This is th
Congrats Ewen.
-Harsha
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015, at 12:08 PM, Ashish Singh wrote:
> Congrats Ewen!
>
> On Tuesday, December 8, 2015, Joe Stein <joe.st...@stealth.ly> wrote:
>
> > Ewen,
> >
> > Congrats!
> >
> > ~ Joestein
> >
> > On Tu
+1 (binding).
1. Ran unit tests
2. Ran SSL & SASL tests using vagrant cluster.
Thanks,
Harsha
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015, at 09:34 AM, Neha Narkhede wrote:
> +1 (binding).
>
> Verified source and binary artifacts, ran unit tests.
>
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Jun Rao
Jun & Ismael,
Unfortunately I couldn't attend the KIP meeting
when delegation tokens discussed. Appreciate if
you can update the thread if you have any
further questions.
Thanks,
Harsha
On Tue,
Rajini,
How does sub-quotas works in case of authenticated users.
Where are we maintaining the relation between users and their
client Ids. Can you add an example of zk data under /users.
Thanks,
Harsha
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016, at 05:01 AM, Rajini Sivaram wrote:
>
Mayuresh & Ismael,
Agree on not breaking interfaces on public API.
+1 on option 2.
Thanks,
Harsha
On Mon, May 23, 2016, at 10:30 AM, Mayuresh Gharat wrote:
> Hi Harsha and Ismael,
>
> Option 2 sounds like a good idea if we want to ma
+1 (binding)
Thanks,
Harsha
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016, at 04:15 PM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
> +1.
>
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:50 PM, Grant Henke <ghe...@clou
+1 (binding)
Thanks,
Harsha
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016, at 05:46 PM, Henry Cai wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 12:44 AM, Guozhang Wang <wang
+1 (binding)
-Harsha
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016, at 11:33 AM, Ismael Juma wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 8:27 PM, Dana Powers <dana.pow...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 -- thanks for the update
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:49 AM,
SASL itself can provide pluggable authentication , why not extend there.
There is also proposal for SASL/PLAIN which does extend the current
authentication options. I think thats what Rajini is also talking about.
-Harsha
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016, at 01:56 AM, tao xiao wrote:
> Hi Rajini,
>
=PLAIN. Client
can send its sasl mechanism before the handshake starts and if the
broker accepts that particular mechanism than it can go ahead with
handshake otherwise return a error saying that the mechanism not
allowed.
Thanks,
Harsha
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016, at 04:58 AM, Rajini Sivaram wrote
on the JAAS file.
-Harsha
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016, at 02:34 AM, Rajini Sivaram wrote:
> Ismael,
>
> The first packet from the client is deliberately empty to distinguish
> between non-negotiating GSSAPI packet and a negotiation packet. If this
> packet contained mechanisms, then the cod
+1
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016, at 02:25 PM, Christian Posta wrote:
> +1 non binding
>
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Gwen Shapira wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Jun Rao wrote:
> >
> > > +1.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Jun
> > >
Rajini,
Thanks for the changes to the KIP. It looks good to me. I
think we can move to voting.
Thanks,
Harsha
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016, at 12:43 AM, Rajini Sivaram wrote:
> I have added some more detail to the KIP based on the discussion in the
> last KIP m
haven't seen anyone asking for this yet.
Thanks,
Harsha
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016, at 01:44 AM, Rajini Sivaram wrote:
> Gwen,
>
> Just to be clear, the alternative would be:
>
> *jaas.conf:*
>
> GssapiKafkaServer {
>
> com.ibm.security.auth.module.Krb5LoginModule required
&
Why we need to add this additional method just for validation. This will
invalidate all the existing authorizer implementations. Why can't we add
the logic for validation and pass it as authorizer config.
-Harsha
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016, at 04:33 PM, Ashish Singh wrote:
> + Parth, Har
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016, at 02:37 AM, tao xiao wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 at 05:33 Andrew Schofield <
> andrew_schofield_j...@outlook.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> >
> > > From: ism...@juma.me.uk
> > > Date: Mon,
Gwen, Ashish,
Rolling upgrade should be fine in this case. Users can
bring down single broker at a time and upgrade their
kafka binaries along with new authorizer
implementation . This looks fine to me.
Thanks,
Harsha
g to break the rolling upgrade? and also moving to Java ,
a authorizer implementation going to run inside a KafkaBroker and I
don't see why this is necessary to move to clients package.
Are we planning on introducing common module to have it independent of
broker and client code?
-Harsha
On Thu, A
right.
-Harsha
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016, at 05:46 AM, Rajini Sivaram wrote:
> Magnus,
>
>
>
>
> *"Why would it be harder to achieve? And is it harder for the Kafka
> developeror the user?Wouldnt it be possible to accept both non-SSL-auth
> and
> SSL-auth clients on
Ashish,
Thanks for the details. We are not changing any of the zookeeper
data format for acls right?
Thanks,
Harsha
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016, at 11:25 AM, Gwen Shapira wrote:
> Can you guys go into details on what will happen during a rolling upgrade
> exactly?
>
> Gwen
>
Any update on this. Gwen since the KIP is adjusted to address the
pluggable classes we should make a move on this.
Rajini,
Can you restart the voting thread.
Thanks,
Harsha
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016, at 06:42 AM, Rajini Sivaram wrote:
> As discussed in the KIP meeting yesterday, the sc
+1
Thanks,
Harsha
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016, at 09:49 PM, Jun Rao wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jun
>
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io> wrote:
>
> > Greetings Kafka Developer Community,
> >
> > As you all know, w
It doesn't need any release vehicle but still the work can move forward.
If anyone is interested in the KIP please do the review and provide the
comments.
-Harsha
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016, at 04:59 PM, Ismael Juma wrote:
> I agree that it would be good to have more time to review and discuss
>
+1
-Harsha
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016, at 01:29 PM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 1:21 PM, Ewen Cheslack-Postava
> <e...@confluent.io>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Liquan Pei <liquan...@gmail.com&
+1
-Harsha
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016, at 10:34 AM, Grant Henke wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Ashish Singh <asi...@cloudera.com>
>
they are stable and thats not way to vet
new apis.
-Harsha
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016, at 10:39 AM, Grant Henke wrote:
> If anyone wants to review the KIP call discussion we had on this just
> before the vote, here is a link to the relevant session (6 minutes in):
> https://youtu.be/Hcjur17TjBE?t
Hi Jason,
Yes I am in favor removing them 0.11 and it definitely gives
everyone one major version to update their clients to remove
the deprecated commands.
Thanks,
Harsha
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016, at 11:02 PM, Ewen Cheslack-Postava wrote:
> I agree with Gr
in having these methods with deprecated tag? we keep
the interface as it is.
Thanks,
Harsha
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016, at 01:27 PM, Ismael Juma wrote:
> Hi Harsha,
>
> What is the aim of the PR, is it to fix binary compatibility, source
> compatibility or both? I think it only
ng is to
give these users time to move onto the new api thats added and keep the
old methods with deprecated tag for atleast one version.
Thanks,
Harsha
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016, at 04:41 PM, Grant Henke wrote:
> FYI. I have attached a sample clients API change/compatibility report to
> KAFKA-1880
Hi Jason,
Agree and its my bad to not to raise this during the
voting of KIP-45. Which I missed it.
We can definitely start a vote around it.
Thanks,
Harsha
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016, at 12:45 PM, Jason Gustafson wrote:
> Hey Harsha,
>
> Probably the mai
Hi,
We missed this vote earlier and realized thats its breaking the
0.9.x client api compatibility. I opened a JIRA here
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3633 . Can we keep
the old methods with deprecated tag in 0.10 release.
Thanks,
Harsha
On Fri, Mar 18
Congrats, Ismael
-Harsha
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016, at 08:01 AM, Jun Rao wrote:
> Congratulations, Ismael!
>
> Jun
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:52 PM, Neha Narkhede <n...@confluent.io>
> wrote:
>
> > The PMC for Apache Kafka has invited Ismael Juma to join as a
Parth,
Overall current design looks good to me. I am +1 on the KIP.
Gwen , Jun can you review this as well.
-Harsha
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016, at 09:57 AM, parth brahmbhatt wrote:
> Thanks for review Jitendra.
>
> I don't like the idea of infinite lifetime but I see the Stre
Manikumar,
Any reason for this. Before the workflow is to open
a new JIRA if a JIRA closed.
-Harsha
On Fri, May 20, 2016, at 08:54 PM, Manikumar Reddy wrote:
> Jun/Ismail,
>
> I requested Apache Infra to change JIRA workflow to add Closed -&
eems to be
better even though it breaks the interface.
Thanks,
Harsha
On Fri, May 20, 2016, at 05:00 PM, Mayuresh Gharat wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I came across an issue with plugging in a custom PrincipalBuilder class
> using the config "principal.builder.class" along with a custo
Hi All,
Can we have a KIP meeting around this. The KIP is up for
sometime and if there are any questions lets quickly hash out
details.
Thanks,
Harsha
On Thu, May 19, 2016, at 08:40 AM, parth brahmbhatt wrote:
> That is what the hadoop echo system uses
+1 . Ran a 3-node cluster with few system tests on our side. Looks good.
-Harsha
On Thu, May 19, 2016, at 07:47 PM, Jun Rao wrote:
> Thanks for running the release. +1 from me. Verified the quickstart.
>
> Jun
>
> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 10:00 PM, Gwen Shapira <g...@c
Hi Gwen,
Can you look at Parth's last reply. Does it answer your
concerns.
Thanks,
Harsha
On Wed, May 4, 2016, at 09:25 AM, parth brahmbhatt wrote:
> Thanks for reviewing Gwen. The wiki already has details on token
> expiration
> under token acquisition process
sharing a single instance of producer. Also in this
case other clients have access all the tokens no?
Thanks,
Harsha
On Tue, May 3, 2016, at 11:49 AM, Gwen Shapira wrote:
> Sorry for the delay:
>
> Two questions that we didn't see in the wiki:
> 1. Is there a
I would also like to get a decision on KIP-45. From the discussions it
seems we are ok to include the changes proposed.
-Harsha
On Mon, May 2, 2016, at 09:15 AM, Gwen Shapira wrote:
> Makes sense.
> I'll try to get one out later today.
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 8:
+1
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016, at 08:06 AM, Grant Henke wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Ashish Singh
> wrote:
>
> > Good idea. Thanks!
> >
> > On Friday, April 15, 2016, Ismael Juma wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 9:25 PM, Harsha <ka...@harsha.io> wrote:
> > It doesn't need any release vehicle but still the work can move forward.
> > If anyone is interested in the KIP please do the review and provide the
> > comments.
> >
> > -Harsha
> >
&g
Bharat,
Here is the jira
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3567
-Harsha
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016, at 10:29 AM, BigData dev wrote:
> Hi All,
> When Kafka is running on kerberoized cluster/ SSL. Can we add an option
> security.protocol. So, that user
Bharat,
Did you add super.users=user:kafka to your
server.properties.
-Harsha
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016, at 05:07 PM, BigData dev wrote:
> Hi All,
> I am facing issue with kafka kerberoized cluster.
>
> After following the steps how to enables SASL on kafka by
used new consumer API from
0.9 release. Anyone has any concerns having this patch in.
Thanks,
-Harsha
Ismael,
Do we need to add old assign and subscribe that accepts List. It
will get implicitly cast to collection with the new methods.
The only problem comes from the methods that accepts varargs.
-Harsha
On Sat, May 7, 2016, at 05:53 PM, Mark Grover wrote:
> Thanks Ismael, I ag
This is very useful. LGTM.
Thanks,
Harsha
On Mon, Jun 25th, 2018 at 10:20 AM, Dong Lin wrote:
>
>
>
> Hey Manikumar,
>
> Thanks much for the KIP. It looks pretty good.
>
> Thanks,
> Dong
>
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 11:38 PM, Manikumar < manikumar.re..
Thanks for the pointer. Will take a look might suit our requirements better.
Thanks,
Harsha
On Mon, Jun 25th, 2018 at 2:52 PM, Lucas Wang wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi Harsha,
>
> If I understand correctly, the replication quota mechanism proposed in
> KIP-73 can be helpful in
+1 (binding)
Thanks,
Harsha
On Wed, Jun 27th, 2018 at 10:56 AM, Damian Guy wrote:
>
>
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> On Wed, 27 Jun 2018 at 18:50 Bill Bejeck < bbej...@gmail.com > wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > -Bill
> >
+1
-Harsha
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018, at 5:15 AM, Thomas Crayford wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 8:20 PM, Lucas Wang wrote:
>
> > Hi Jun, Ismael,
> >
> > Can you please take a look when you get a chance? Thanks!
> >
> > Lucas
>
+1.
1) Ran unit tests
2) 3 node cluster , tested basic operations.
Thanks,
Harsha
On Mon, Jul 2nd, 2018 at 11:13 AM, "Vahid S Hashemian"
wrote:
>
>
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Built from source and ran quickstart successfully on Ubuntu (with Java 8).
>
+1.
1) Ran unit tests
2) 3 node cluster , tested basic operations.
Thanks,
Harsha
On Mon, Jul 2nd, 2018 at 11:57 AM, Jun Rao wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi, Matthias,
>
> Thanks for the running the release. Verified quickstart on scala 2.12
> binary. +1
>
> Jun
>
&
+1.
Thanks,
Harsha
On Tue, Jul 3rd, 2018 at 9:22 AM, Ted Yu wrote:
>
>
>
> +1
>
> On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 9:05 AM, Mickael Maison < mickael.mai...@gmail.com >
>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non binding)
> > Thanks for the KIP
> >
&g
+1 (binding)
Thanks,
Harsha
On Tue, Aug 7, 2018, at 10:22 AM, Manikumar wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks for the KIP.
>
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 10:42 PM Ray Chiang wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > -Ray
> >
> > On 8/7/18 9:26 AM,
+1 (binding)
Thanks,
Harsha
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018, at 9:15 AM, Manikumar wrote:
> Hi Viktor,
> We already have a method in Authorizer interface to get acls for a given
> principal.
> We will use this method to fetch acls and filter the results for requested
> Resources.
> Aut
+1 (binding)
-Harsha
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018, at 12:46 PM, Jakub Scholz wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 6:24 PM Manikumar wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I would like to start voting on KIP-357 which allows to list ACLs per
> > princ
+1.
Thanks,
Harsha
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018, at 4:19 AM, Attila Sasvári wrote:
> Thanks for the KIP and the updates Viktor!
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 10:44 AM Manikumar
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Thanks for the
+1.
Thanks,
Harsha
On Fri, Jun 1st, 2018 at 10:21 AM, "Vahid S Hashemian"
wrote:
>
>
>
> I'm bumping this vote thread up as the KIP requires only one binding +1 to
>
> pass.
> The KIP is very similar in nature to the recently approved KIP-277 (
> h
+1
1. Ran unit tests
2. Tested few use cases through 3-node cluster.
Thanks,
Harsha
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018, at 9:33 AM, Mickael Maison wrote:
> +1 non-binding
> Built from source, ran tests, ran quickstart and check signatures
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 1
+1.
1. Ran unit tests
2. Ran 3 node cluster to run few tests.
Thanks,
Harsha
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018, at 7:29 AM, Manikumar wrote:
> +1 (non-binding) Ran tests, Verified quick start, producer/consumer perf
> tests
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 11:06 AM Brett Rann
>
Very useful. LGTM.
Thanks,
Harsha
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018, at 9:56 AM, Manikumar wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have created a KIP to add describe all topics API to AdminClient .
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-327%3A+Add+describe+all+topics+API+to+AdminClient
&
+1.
* Ran unit tests
* Installed in a cluster and ran simple tests
Thanks,
Harsha
On Mon, Jul 9th, 2018 at 6:38 AM, Ted Yu wrote:
>
>
>
> +1
>
> Ran test suite.
>
> Checked signatures.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 3:36 PM Dong Lin < lindon..
+1
Ran tests
Ran a 3 node cluster to test basic operations.
Thanks,
Harsha
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018, at 9:04 AM, Ted Yu wrote:
> +1
>
> Ran test suite - passed (apart from testMetricsLeak which is flaky).
>
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 3:30 AM, Damian Guy <damian@gmail.com>
.
Thanks,
Harsha
On Fri, Jun 22nd, 2018 at 11:35 AM Lucas Wang wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi Eno,
>
> Sorry for the delayed response.
> - I haven't implemented the feature yet, so no experimental results so
> far.
> And I plan to test in out in the following days.
>
Congrats Mani!! Very well deserved.
--Harsha
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018, at 5:20 PM, Attila Sasvari wrote:
> Congratulations Manikumar! Keep up the good work.
>
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 12:30 AM Jungtaek Lim wrote:
>
> > Congrats Mani!
> > On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 at 1
which can deployed in mesos
or container orchestrations. If possible can you document in the rejected
alternatives what are missing parts that made you to consider a new design from
ground up.
Thanks,
Harsha
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018, at 8:34 AM, Ryanne Dolan wrote:
> Jan, these are two separ
1 - 100 of 288 matches
Mail list logo