+1 on removing the .Final suffix.
Mario
On 2023/11/28 14:03:30 Alex Porcelli wrote:
> We already have defined that all projects/artifacts will be aligned on
> 10. However, we must still determine if we should use 10.0.0 or
> 10.0.0.Final.
>
> I might be ahead, but as we progress towards the
+1 for 10.0.0
-1 for .Final
I don't like how ".Final" changes semantic versioning (https://semver.org). It
also does not fit with the rest of the ASF community on a search through
search.maven.org.
On 2023/11/28 14:03:30 Alex Porcelli wrote:
> We already have defined that all
Hi everyone,
+1 for 10.0.0
Best regards,
Tibor
Dňa ut 28. 11. 2023, 15:16 Thiago Lugli napísal(a):
> +1 for 10.0.0
> 0 for 10.0.0.Final
>
> Quarkus dropped the .Final post 3.3 releases and I think we should follow.
> We can still use alpha/beta/release-candidate versioning for non-final
>
+1 for 10.0.0
0 for 10.0.0.Final
Quarkus dropped the .Final post 3.3 releases and I think we should follow.
We can still use alpha/beta/release-candidate versioning for non-final
builds.
Em ter., 28 de nov. de 2023 às 11:03, Alex Porcelli
escreveu:
> We already have defined that all
We already have defined that all projects/artifacts will be aligned on
10. However, we must still determine if we should use 10.0.0 or
10.0.0.Final.
I might be ahead, but as we progress towards the release, starting
this discussion sometime in advance would be valuable.
So, here is my
