+1
Signature files good
Hash looks good
Build passed
Contains incubating
Regards,
Uma
On 7/22/16, 3:08 PM, "Gary" wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic
>0.2.0-incubating, release candidate 3. This
>is the second release of Mnemonic incubating.
>
+1, Thanks.
+Gary
On 7/22/2016 3:08 PM, Gary wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic
> 0.2.0-incubating, release candidate 3. This
> is the second release of Mnemonic incubating.
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
>
+1
- able to compile src
- RAT checks are fine
- checked LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER files
Thanks,
Rakesh
On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 3:38 AM, Gary wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic
> 0.2.0-incubating, release candidate 3. This
> is the second
+1
Thanks,
Hao
-Original Message-
From: Gary [mailto:ga...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2016 10:29 AM
To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.2.0-incubating [rc3]
+1
Thanks.
+Gary.
On 7/22/2016 3:08 PM, Gary wrote:
> Hi
+1
Thanks.
+Gary.
On 7/22/2016 3:08 PM, Gary wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic
> 0.2.0-incubating, release candidate 3. This
> is the second release of Mnemonic incubating.
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
>
+1
new code is clean, I am able to compile and run test examples.
Thanks
yanping
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 11:03 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> +1 sig/xsum are valid, RAT ran clean, necessarily files seem to be in place
> (e.g. disclaimer), I was able to build successfully.
>
>
+1 sig/xsum are valid, RAT ran clean, necessarily files seem to be in place
(e.g. disclaimer), I was able to build successfully.
Patrick
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Gary wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic
> 0.2.0-incubating, release