Hi Ben,
If the below idea of allowing NULL values for Indexed columns makes
sense., shall we add an attribute (allow_null_index = false kind) as an
optional parameter for such type of columns and ensure compatibility with
existing/old schema? Does it sound okay?
Thanks
Krishna Mohan
On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 10:38:40PM +, Ansari, Shad wrote:
> >
> > HI Ben,
> > How does column which is weak reference and also configured as
> > an Index? If it is mutable, and the corresponding UUID going away(deletion
> > of record) leaves column value as NULL right? And what would be
I was on vacation last week; I'm back now.
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 02:50:21AM +, Elluru, Krishna Mohan wrote:
> HI Ben,
> Gentle reminder, in case you missed it :). I am still waiting for your
> reply.
>
> Thanks
> Krishna Mohan
>
> -Original Message-
> From: dev
On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 04:01:43AM +, Elluru, Krishna Mohan wrote:
> HI Ben,
> How does column which is weak reference and also configured as an
> Index? If it is mutable, and the corresponding UUID going away(deletion of
> record) leaves column value as NULL right? And what would be
This patch add column "enabled" to table Logical_Router
for setting router administrative state.
The type of "enabled" is bool.
If the administrative state is false, delete all the flows
relevant to the logical router from table Logical_Flow.
Signed-off-by: Na Zhu
---
Hi Baohua,
Rally guys are working on splitting Rally from OpenStack, after they done
that, ovn-scale-test can be implemented as a pure plugin of Rally without
customized deployment and task procedure. I think ovn-scale-test as a
plugin is not necessary to integrate back to rally repo, this also
Hi,
I’d like to use ALGs other than FTP (TFTP, and another one that I’m writing)
and see several barriers in OVS that appear to be mostly artificial.
Here’s my understanding - please correct where necessary:
• the command-line parser will only allow “alg=ftp”, and if this is found it
encodes
interesting work!
will it be integrated back to rally repo?
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Lei Huang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In last few months we created a ovn scalability test tool, it is
> implemented based on openstack/rally project, its repo is
>
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 7:21 PM, Lei Huang wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In last few months we created a ovn scalability test tool, it is
implemented based on openstack/rally project, its repo is
https://github.com/l8huang/ovn-scale-test.
>
> Its basic usage is creating thounsands of
HI Ben,
Gentle reminder, in case you missed it :). I am still waiting for your
reply.
Thanks
Krishna Mohan
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Elluru, Krishna
Mohan
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 9:32 AM
To: Ben Pfaff
Cc:
Hi,
In last few months we created a ovn scalability test tool, it is
implemented based on openstack/rally project, its repo is
https://github.com/l8huang/ovn-scale-test.
Its basic usage is creating thounsands of ovs sandboxes(to simulate HVs) on
multiple BMs, and create and bind lports to these
30+ Day Old Patches
===
ID State Date Name
-- -
587107 New2016-02-23 21:39:57 [ovs-dev,v3] lib/ovs-thread: Add
Transactional Memory (TM) support.
587370 New2016-02-24 12:47:34 [ovs-dev,v2] dpif-netdev:
I previously posted these patches in August. This is merely a rebase.
Ben Pfaff (3):
vswitch.xml: OpenFlow 1.5 has been released.
Add skeleton for OF1.6 support.
ofp-errors: Introduce OF1.6 (proposed) error code for
OFPBFC_BAD_VERSION.
FAQ.md | 33
From: Ben Pfaff
Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
---
vswitchd/vswitch.xml | 12 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/vswitchd/vswitch.xml b/vswitchd/vswitch.xml
index 7d6976f..161e163 100644
--- a/vswitchd/vswitch.xml
+++
From: Ben Pfaff
ONF-JIRA: EXT-550
Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
---
include/openvswitch/ofp-errors.h | 6 +++---
lib/ofp-util.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/openvswitch/ofp-errors.h
Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
---
FAQ.md | 33 +--
build-aux/extract-ofp-errors | 3 +-
build-aux/extract-ofp-msgs | 3 +-
include/openflow/openflow-common.h | 5 ++-
lib/ofp-actions.c | 1 +
lib/ofp-errors.c
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 12:40:33PM -0800, William Tu wrote:
> These two locks are reported by helgrind which have ordering inconsistency.
> "netdev_class_mutex"
> "route_table_mutex"
> http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/discuss/2016-February/020216.html
Thanks for the report. Somehow I didn't get
Please Sir, help me my life is in DANGER my late husband brothers want
to kill me over of my late husband properties,because i have no CHILD.
Please reply to my private Email at (rose_s...@yahoo.ca) for me to
give you more details, because I am using my friend Email address Mr
Stanley to send you
That's correct.
I've been on vacation but I'll try to review the new version soon.
On Sun, Apr 03, 2016 at 10:55:49PM -0700, Nirapada Ghosh wrote:
>
> Hi Ben,
>
> Thanks much for confirming, not sure about the right process here, I
> submitted version 3 of my patch [version 2 had some problems
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 12:02:33AM +0200, Petr Machata wrote:
> Ben Pfaff writes:
>
> > We would be pleased to take additional ofproto pr oviders as long as
> > they are clean and maintainable (and actually maintained). We would
>
> We will want to put forward code that is up to
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 11:34:05AM +0800, 张东亚 wrote:
> Recently I am reading ovn source code, there are some STATES before OVN
> controller shift to UPDATE_FLOWS state, one state is named CLEAR_FLOWS,
> which seems clear all the flows in the ovs-vswitchd before programming new
> flows, IMHO this
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 12:44:02AM -0300, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 09:54:03PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > When we recently ran a genuine vulnerability through this process, we
> > discovered that 3-5 days was far too short. The business processes behind
> > releasing fixed
On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 04:07:50PM -0600, Ryan Moats wrote:
> "dev" wrote on 03/31/2016 11:54:03 PM:
>
> > From: Ben Pfaff
> > To: dev@openvswitch.org
> > Cc: Ben Pfaff
> > Date: 03/31/2016 11:54 PM
> > Subject: [ovs-dev] [PATCH]
No, I'm talking about the rest of the comment, please read it again.
The difference between 1000 vs 1024 bits is a trivial 2.4% difference.
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 09:46:28PM +0200, Sławek Kapłoński wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thx for anwear and checking that. AFAIU You are talking about issue with SI
Hello,
Thx for anwear and checking that. AFAIU You are talking about issue with SI
and IEC units and problem with it.
I'm not talking about such issue or not issue. What I pointed here is that
(from comment in ovs code) ovs is doing something like:
"sbin/tc filter add dev parent :
On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 11:21:12AM +, Sorin Vinturis wrote:
> Hot add CPU is the ability to dynamically add CPUs to a running
> system. Adding CPUs can occur physically by adding new hardware,
> logically by online hardware partitioning, or virtually through
> a virtualization layer.
>
> This
On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 09:28:50PM +0200, Sławek Kapłoński wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm playing littlebit with ingress policing in openvswitch and I found some
> kind of inconsistency.
> In docs and in source code (https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/blob/master/
> lib/netdev-linux.c#L4698) there is
On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 10:43:20PM +, Rodriguez Betancourt, Esteban wrote:
> Calculates the cksum removing the cksum line using a more
> strict regex than the used previously.
> It fixes a problem when calculating the cksum of a schema that
> has fields with the substring cksum (e.g.: a
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 03:12:59AM +, Daniele Di Proietto wrote:
>
>
> On 01/04/2016 09:52, "Jarno Rajahalme" wrote:
>
> >
> >> On Mar 30, 2016, at 8:08 PM, Daniele Di Proietto
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 30/03/2016 16:01, "Ben Pfaff"
Please don't drop the list.
Yes, that's possible, since veth pairs show up as proper Linux devices.
--Justin
> On Apr 10, 2016, at 7:55 AM, Faseela K wrote:
>
> Hi Justin,
>Thanks for your reply.
> I read some answer on ovs-discuss forum, where they mentioned
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 05:38:16PM +0800, Xiao Liang wrote:
> Add new column "ofname" in Interface table to configure port name reported
> to controllers with OpenFlow protocol, thus decouple OpenFlow port name from
> device name.
>
> For example:
> # ovs-vsctl set Interface eth0 ofname=wan
>
On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 04:08:22PM -0700, Han Zhou wrote:
> On Friday, April 8, 2016, Xiao Liang wrote:
> >
> > Add new column "ofname" in Interface table to configure port name reported
> > to controllers with OpenFlow protocol, thus decouple OpenFlow port name
> from
> >
This Message was undeliverable due to the following reason:
Your message was not delivered because the destination computer was
not reachable within the allowed queue period. The amount of time
a message is queued before it is returned depends on local configura-
tion parameters.
Most likely
Hey there!
Just wanted to follow up one last time to see if you were interested in working
with us?
Ryan
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Ryan Brody
wrote:
Hi there,
Just wanted to check back in to see if you
Message could not be delivered
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
35 matches
Mail list logo