I pushed the intended version except that I forgot to squash that commit with
the previous one. Sorry about this
On 28/07/2016 00:40, "Ilya Maximets" wrote:
>Sorry.
>TO: Daniele Di Proietto
>
>On 28.07.2016 09:27, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>> I
On 27 July 2016 at 23:27, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> I guess, you pushed some development version of this patch set.
>
> There is strange commit there:
>
> commit 6c54734ed27bc22975d7035a6bd5f32a412335a0
> Author: Daniele Di Proietto
> Date: Wed Jul
Congrats! This has been a while coming:)
On 27 July 2016 at 23:17, Daniele Di Proietto wrote:
> Thanks for the reviews, I pushed this to master except for the system tests
> part.
>
>
>
> On 26/07/2016 17:58, "Daniele Di Proietto" wrote:
>
>>This
Sorry.
TO: Daniele Di Proietto
On 28.07.2016 09:27, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> I guess, you pushed some development version of this patch set.
>
> There is strange commit there:
>
> commit 6c54734ed27bc22975d7035a6bd5f32a412335a0
> Author: Daniele Di Proietto
I guess, you pushed some development version of this patch set.
There is strange commit there:
commit 6c54734ed27bc22975d7035a6bd5f32a412335a0
Author: Daniele Di Proietto
Date: Wed Jul 27 18:32:15 2016 -0700
XXX Improve comment.
Best regards, Ilya Maximets.
Thanks for the reviews, I pushed this to master except for the system tests
part.
On 26/07/2016 17:58, "Daniele Di Proietto" wrote:
>This series aims to implement the ct() action for the dpif-netdev datapath.
>The bulk of the code is in the new conntrack module: it
This series aims to implement the ct() action for the dpif-netdev datapath.
The bulk of the code is in the new conntrack module: it contains some packet
parsing code, some lookup tables and the logic to implements all the ct bits.
The conntrack module is helped by conntrack-tcp, for TCP window