To: dev@plc4x.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] What should the "Connection Pool" be named?
Here is how I would create the abstraction; There are "physical connections"
from the PLC4X to zero, one or more devices, and a single connection is held to
each device. Then we n
Here is how I would create the abstraction;
There are "physical connections" from the PLC4X to zero, one or more
devices, and a single connection is held to each device. Then we need a
solution where different threads can access each such physical
connection in an ordered/shared manner. So,
byte-based access in this case. But
that's fine-tuning we would need to add over time, I think. But the same could
be done for different transport variants.
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Snow
Sent: Freitag, 21. Januar 2022 13:55
To: dev@plc4x.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] W
Hello,
On Fri, 2022-01-21 at 11:35 +, Christofer Dutz wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> in the past we had a "ConnectionPool" ... but in reality, we don't
> have a pool of multiple connection to one target, like in databases,
> but usually we have only one connection to each source in the "pool".
> But
