To: dev@plc4x.apache.org
Subject: Re: More possible problems with connection pools
On 2022-01-21 10:12, Christofer Dutz wrote:
> I think the very special problem we have here is the limitation of the
> number of concurrent connections PLCs usually provide ... my S7 1200
> allows 3 c
On 2022-01-21 10:12, Christofer Dutz wrote:
I think the very special problem we have here is the limitation of the
number of concurrent connections PLCs usually provide ... my S7 1200
allows 3 concurrent connections. My KNX gateway (which is one of the
better models allowing multiple concurrent
Message-
From: Christofer Dutz
Sent: Freitag, 21. Januar 2022 10:13
To: dev@plc4x.apache.org
Subject: RE: More possible problems with connection pools
Hi Niclas,
I think the very special problem we have here is the limitation of the number
of concurrent connections PLCs usually provide ... my S7
Subject: Re: More possible problems with connection pools
On 2022-01-21 09:19, Christofer Dutz wrote:
> So instead of having the subscriber having to keep the connection to
> keep the subscription alive, I would opt for adding subscriptions to
> the connection and keeping them valid, e
On 2022-01-21 09:19, Christofer Dutz wrote:
So instead of having the subscriber having to keep the connection to
keep the subscription alive, I would opt for adding subscriptions to
the connection and keeping them valid, even after the connection is
returned to the pool. Yes, this causes
