Yes, Marton, there will be an rc1 as I said.
Time, the blocker as-always.
On 10/30/18 4:45 AM, Elek, Marton wrote:
Hi,
Is there any plan to restart this vote? Or is there any blocker?
Thanks,
Marton
On 10/12/18 9:02 PM, Josh Elser wrote:
This vote failed. Will be rolling an rc1.
On
Hi,
Is there any plan to restart this vote? Or is there any blocker?
Thanks,
Marton
On 10/12/18 9:02 PM, Josh Elser wrote:
> This vote failed. Will be rolling an rc1.
>
> On 10/8/18 7:29 PM, Josh Elser wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please vote on the following release candidate to become Apache
FYI, did this at 15:29:51 EDT against
9b2d7b65cf271e2b3b3616d427edf2688586a56c (which is the commit for RATIS-348)
On 10/11/18 3:17 PM, Jitendra Pandey wrote:
RATIS-348 is committed, so we are good to push new snapshot for this ozone
blocker.
On 10/11/18, 11:59 AM, "Josh Elser" wrote:
RATIS-348 is committed, so we are good to push new snapshot for this ozone
blocker.
On 10/11/18, 11:59 AM, "Josh Elser" wrote:
(pulling this out the vote thread to avoid confusion)
No problem, Anu. Happy to push a SNAPSHOT build of Ratis.
On 10/11/18 2:56 PM, Anu Engineer
(pulling this out the vote thread to avoid confusion)
No problem, Anu. Happy to push a SNAPSHOT build of Ratis.
On 10/11/18 2:56 PM, Anu Engineer wrote:
Would it be possible to do a full Ratis snap-shot release? So, we can just
consume all the changes with a single update on ozone side.
Would it be possible to do a full Ratis snap-shot release? So, we can just
consume all the changes with a single update on ozone side.
Sorry, I am just being a little selfish here, but it makes ozone’s life little
easier. Otherwise we will have to follow up with another release.
--Anu
On
Hi Josh,
Can you please include Ratis-348?, it fixes a critical issue for Ozone. You
might have to wait until the end of day to roll the build.
Thanks
Anu
On 10/11/18, 11:26 AM, "Josh Elser" wrote:
The only thing that the ASF releases is source code, therefore the
policy you're
The only thing that the ASF releases is source code, therefore the
policy you're quoting isn't relevant. There is no requirement to vote on
binary artifacts that are created from that source release. The
obligation on us is to verify that anything else the source release
creates follows ASF
> I don't see any value for that, tbh. ...
I agree that no one is going to download and use the binary. However,
it is an artifact which we can vote for. It seems ASF requires us to
put this artifact in the distribution directory, which is a
subdirectory of www.apache.org/dist/ according to
Thanks for the vote, Nicholas!
On 10/10/18 10:43 PM, Tsz Wo Sze wrote:
> - untar and then "mvn install" does work for me. It won't work if we
> run a second "mvn install" without clean. "mvn install" works again
> after "mvn clean". It seems not a problem.
Will have to investigate what's
+1
- verified signature/checksum
- verified LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER in
ratis-thirdparty-parent-0.1.0-src.tar.gz
- untar and then "mvn install" does work for me. It won't work if we
run a second "mvn install" without clean. "mvn install" works again
after "mvn clean". It seems not a
I've noticed this once and again, but chalked it up to some issue with
the shade plugin. I'm not quite sure where to start digging in to figure
out why it happens... will have to start broad :)
On 10/8/18 11:39 PM, Ted Yu wrote:
True.
Though I wouldn't expect the 'mvn install' to fail :-)
+1
On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 4:29 PM Josh Elser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please vote on the following release candidate to become Apache Ratis
> Thirdparty 0.1.0.
>
> The Apache Ratis Thirdparty project is a collection of all thirdparty
> dependencies that Apache Ratis uses, repackaged for optimal use by
True.
Though I wouldn't expect the 'mvn install' to fail :-)
On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 8:14 PM Sergey Soldatov
wrote:
> I have the same result with mvn install. Actually, mvn clean install works
> fine.
>
> Thanks,
> Sergey
>
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 7:53 PM Ted Yu wrote:
>
> > When running 'mvn
I have the same result with mvn install. Actually, mvn clean install works
fine.
Thanks,
Sergey
On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 7:53 PM Ted Yu wrote:
> When running 'mvn install', I got:
>
> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-shade-plugin:3.1.1:shade (default) on
> project
When running 'mvn install', I got:
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-shade-plugin:3.1.1:shade (default) on
project ratis-thirdparty: Error creating shaded jar: duplicate entry:
META-INF/services/org.apache.ratis.thirdparty.io.grpc.ServerProvider ->
[Help 1]
Hi,
Please vote on the following release candidate to become Apache Ratis
Thirdparty 0.1.0.
The Apache Ratis Thirdparty project is a collection of all thirdparty
dependencies that Apache Ratis uses, repackaged for optimal use by
Ratis. As such, there is very little net-new source code in
17 matches
Mail list logo
