+1
I have checked:
* Download links are valid.
* Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
* Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 1:30 AM Jia Yu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for vote on Apache Sedona 1.6.0-rc3. Notably, in this
>
+1
I checked:
* Download links are valid
* Checksums and PGP signatures are valid
* NOTICE is included
* Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release
* The project can compile from the source code
On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 11:05 PM Jia Yu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Sorry for
+1
I checked:
* Download links are valid
* Checksums and PGP signatures are valid
* NOTICE is included
* Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release
* The project can compile from the source code
On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 12:43 AM Jia Yu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a
+1
I checked:
* Download links are valid
* Checksums and PGP signatures are valid
* NOTICE is included
* Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release
* The project can compile from the source code
* Sedona basic geometry functions work without geotools-wrapper
On Sat,
+1
checked:
* Download links are valid
* Checksums and PGP signatures are valid
* NOTICE is included
* Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release
* The project can compile from the source code
Best Regards,
-
On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 9:29 PM Jia Yu wrote:
> Hi all,
+1
I checked:
* Download links are valid
* Checksums and PGP signatures are valid
* NOTICE is included
* Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release
* The project can compile from the source code
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 9:07 PM Jia Yu wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> We still
Hi,
Not sure about databricks, but it seems to be working fine on Wherobots.
Can you try to run the same function on a sample dataset there on
https://www.wherobots.services/
It should work on the free version.
Docs here:
+1
* Download links are valid
* Checksums and PGP signatures are valid
* NOTICE is included
* Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release
* The project can compile from the source code
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 10:10 PM Kristin Cowalcijk
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a
Hi Martin,
Thanks for proposing this feature. Will the writer generate cloud-optimized
GeoTiFF. I am asking because Cogs are becoming industry standards for
storing raster in object stores.
-Mo
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 6:53 AM Martin Andersson (Jira)
wrote:
> Martin Andersson created
+1
- Download links are valid
- Checksums and PGP signatures are valid
- NOTICE is included
- Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release
- The project can compile from the source code
-
Mo
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 11:21 PM Jia Yu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a call
This is a great PR!
Just wondering how the output of the test looks like. I will show all OGC
standard requirements and for each requirement a check mark ✅ is printed
out if Sedona supports it. On the other hand, if Sedona does not satisfy a
specific OGC requirement, the test will print out a
t;
> Br,
> Martin Andersson
>
> Den mån 16 jan. 2023 kl 17:31 skrev Mo Sarwat :
>
> > Martin, thanks for the info. Does he know about Apache Sedona already?
> > Perhaps, he needs to learn more about it.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Mo
> >
> > On Mon
Martin, thanks for the info. Does he know about Apache Sedona already?
Perhaps, he needs to learn more about it.
Thanks,
-Mo
On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 9:19 AM Martin Andersson <
u.martin.anders...@gmail.com> wrote:
> FYI Geo functions are requested at the spark mailing list. No replies yet.
>
>
+1
* Download links are valid
* Checksums and PGP signatures are valid
* DISCLAIMER and NOTICE are included
* Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release
* The project can compile from the source code
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 8:55 AM Jia Yu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is
Martin,
That sounds like a good idea - thanks for the proposal. But, we first need
to consider the following:
1. Make sure that will not break other components in Sedona
2. The speed of using SIS is at least the same as GeoTools. Better if
faster for sure
If those 2 points are covered, I
Martin,
That sounds like a good idea - thanks for the proposal. But, we first need
to consider the following:
1. Make sure that will not break other components in Sedona
2. The speed of using SIS is at least the same as GeoTools. Better if
faster for sure
If those 2 points are covered, I
Everyone, please remember to vote :)
On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 3:37 AM Martin Andersson <
u.martin.anders...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Tests for our pipelines passed with sedona-1.3.0-rc2
>
> Den tors 17 nov. 2022 kl 19:38 skrev Mo Sarwat :
>
> > +1
>
+1
I checked:
* Download links are valid
* Checksums and PGP signatures are valid
* DISCLAIMER and NOTICE are included
* Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release
* The project can compile from the source code
On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 12:18 AM Jia Yu wrote:
> Hi
> > > > Dear all,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This release is supposed to be the last release before
> > graduation.
> > > > Please
> > > > > > > make sure you vote +1 with a checklist (see my vote below). The
> > > >
t
Regards,
Mo Sarwat
Is the release approved? Did we get the IPMC approval yet?
On Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 7:42 PM Kanchan Chowdhury
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> The vote closes now as 72hr have passed. The vote PASSES with
>
> +1 (binding): Jia Yu, Mo Sarwat, Adam Binford
> +0 (non-binding):
> No
+1
On Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 9:24 AM Kanchan Chowdhury
wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> We need more votes for Apache Sedona Release 1.2.1. Could you please look
> into the details in my voting email and vote accordingly? Thank you for
> your time.
>
> Best Regards,
> Kanchan Chowdhury
>
> On Fri, Aug 5,
+1
On Sat, Jun 18, 2022 at 6:05 PM Jia Yu wrote:
> Dear all in the community,
>
> I am starting a vote to graduate Apache Sedona (incubating) as a Top Level
> Project.
>
> After a community discussion [1], we gathered a lot of feedback that
> the community supported Sedona to graduate from the
Thanks Jia - I don’t mind getting the vote started.
On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 11:04 AM Jia Yu wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Our suitable name search ticket has been approved by ASF:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-200
>
> If you have no other comments, I will call for a vote to
+1
On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 12:42 PM Yitao Li wrote:
> +1
>
> I checked:
>
> 1. Download links are valid.
>
> 2. Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
>
> 3. DISCLAIMER and NOTICE included.
>
> 4. Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
>
> 5. The project can
+1
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 11:38 AM Jia Yu wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks,
> Jia
>
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 11:44 PM Paweł Kociński
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a call for vote on Apache Sedona 1.2.0-incubating-rc1. Please
> refer
> > to the changes listed at the
+1
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 9:38 PM Jia Yu wrote:
> CC several key members in the community
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 9:31 PM Jia Yu wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a call for vote on Apache Sedona 1.1.0-incubating-rc1. Please
> > refer to the changes listed at the bottom of this
+1
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 9:57 PM Jia Yu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for vote on Apache Sedona 1.0.1-incubating-rc1. Please refer
> to the changes listed at the bottom of this email.
>
> Release notes:
>
>
Shantanu,
It will be a great idea to include GeoTiff capability into Apache Sedona.
As for the other libraries mentioned by Jim. In case they plan on pushing
their code as part of the Apache Sedona source code, I believe it will not
be a good idea for you to push your code. However, in case the
I vote +1
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 1:26 AM Jia Yu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for vote on Apache Sedona (incubating) 1.0.0 rc1. Please
> refer to the changes listed at the bottom of this email.
>
> Release note:
>
>
+1
Mo Sarwat
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 9:30 PM wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> This is Jinxuan Wu, I am giving this release a +1 (approve)
>
> Did following checks:
> [x] Download links are valid.
> [x] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
> [x] DISCLAIMER is included.
>
Yes, I believe we still need to support Spark 2.4 since many Sedona users
are still using it
On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 11:21 PM Netanel Malka wrote:
> What do you mean by compile target?
>
> ?
>
> Iv'e found Apache Zeppelin handle multiple Spark versions here using
> profile for each Spark
Hi Jia,
I think it will be a good idea to have a single centralized location where
users submit their issues and bug reports. However, is there a way we make
this clear and easy to current and future users ?
THanks,
On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 11:00 AM Jia Yu wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
>
>
> I am
33 matches
Mail list logo
