That was it, thanks!
https://github.com/apache/spark-website/pull/183
Well, in my defense: PEP or IntelliJ made me do it, and I continue to
resent Python for this kind of nonsense. But my bad for not testing
this on a dummy commit, to be sure.
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 6:09 PM Marcelo Vanzin
BTW the main script has this that the website script does not:
if sys.version < '3':
input = raw_input # noqa
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 3:55 PM Sean Owen wrote:
>
> I'm seriously confused on this one. The spark-website merge script
> just stopped working for me. It fails on the call to
Goal is to provide ability to deny/allow access to given tables on a per user
basis (this is the user connecting via jdbc to spark thrift server. ie with
LDAP creds). ie user bob can see table A but not table B. user mary can see
table B but not table A.
What are folks thoughts on the approach?
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 4:03 PM Reynold Xin wrote:
> lol
>
> couldn't have said it better myself. ;)
shane
--
Shane Knapp
UC Berkeley EECS Research / RISELab Staff Technical Lead
https://rise.cs.berkeley.edu
Oh my. Thanks for that. Let me get to the bottom of the right thing to do
here. I still don't get why the main spark script works doing the same
thing!
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019, 6:02 PM Marcelo Vanzin You're talking about the spark-website script, right? The main repo's
> script has been working for
lol
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 4:02 PM, Marcelo Vanzin < van...@cloudera.com.invalid >
wrote:
>
>
>
> You're talking about the spark-website script, right? The main repo's
> script has been working for me, the website one is broken.
>
>
>
> I think it was caused by this dude changing
You're talking about the spark-website script, right? The main repo's
script has been working for me, the website one is broken.
I think it was caused by this dude changing raw_input to input recently:
commit 8b6e7dceaf5d73de3f92907ceeab8925a2586685
Author: Sean Owen
Date: Sat Jan 19 19:02:30
I'm seriously confused on this one. The spark-website merge script
just stopped working for me. It fails on the call to input() that
expects a y/n response, saying 'y' isn't defined.
Indeed, it seems like Python 2's input() tries to evaluate the input,
rather than return a string. Python 3
Hey Jacek,
You mean:
* @groupname udf_funcs UDF functions
* @groupname agg_funcs Aggregate functions
* @groupname datetime_funcs Date time functions
* @groupname sort_funcs Sorting functions
* @groupname normal_funcs Non-aggregate functions
* @groupname math_funcs Math functions
*
We normally do not follow MySQL. Check the commercial database [like
Oracle]? or the open source PostgreSQL?
Sean Owen 于2019年2月15日周五 上午5:34写道：
> year("1912") == 1912 makes sense; month("1912") == 1 is odd but not
> wrong. On the one hand, some answer might be better than none. But
> then, we
year("1912") == 1912 makes sense; month("1912") == 1 is odd but not
wrong. On the one hand, some answer might be better than none. But
then, we are trying to match Hive semantics where the SQL standard is
silent. Is this actually defined behavior in a SQL standard, or, what
does MySQL do?
On Fri,
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-26885 and
https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/71170e74df5c7ec657f61154212d1dc2ba7d0613/sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/DateTimeUtils.scala
stringToTimestamp, stringToDate support , as a result:
select
12 matches
Mail list logo
