Yes thats correct, the release script needs a bit of work and it's diverged
a bit from 3.0 as well. I'll follow up with some more PRs in addition to
the current one I have.
On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 10:08 PM Sean Owen wrote:
> I suspect there were some problems with the release script to fix.
>
>
+1 (binding), thanks!
On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 9:23 PM Wenchen Fan wrote:
> +1 (binding), although I don't know why we jump from RC 3 to RC 8...
>
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 7:47 AM Holden Karau wrote:
>
>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark
>> version 2.4.6.
>>
>>
I suspect there were some problems with the release script to fix.
+1 from me, same as last time. This still appears to be OK in licenses and
sigs, and source compiles and passes tests.
On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 11:23 PM Wenchen Fan wrote:
> +1 (binding), although I don't know why we jump from
+1 (binding), although I don't know why we jump from RC 3 to RC 8...
On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 7:47 AM Holden Karau wrote:
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark
> version 2.4.6.
>
> The vote is open until June 5th at 9AM PST and passes if a majority +1 PMC
> votes are
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark
version 2.4.6.
The vote is open until June 5th at 9AM PST and passes if a majority +1 PMC
votes are cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes.
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 2.4.6
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because
I've already cut a new RC so I'd rather save SPARK-29536 but I'll include
mention of that in the vote e-mail.
On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 4:09 PM Sean Owen wrote:
> Probably, though given the late stage of this release cycle, I'd say that
> should go into 2.4.7.
> I think we are good to for a
Probably, though given the late stage of this release cycle, I'd say that
should go into 2.4.7.
I think we are good to for a probably fine 2.4.6 RC4 ? the indylambda
change was merged a while ago.
On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 8:52 AM Ismaël Mejía wrote:
> I was wondering if there is any chance that