+1
Xiao
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 9:32 AM Mridul Muralidharan
wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Thanks,
> Mridul
>
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 4:49 PM Holden Karau wrote:
>
>> Hi Spark Developers,
>>
>> After the discussion of the proposal to amend Spark committer guidelines,
>> it appears folks are generally in
+1
Thanks,
Mridul
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 4:49 PM Holden Karau wrote:
> Hi Spark Developers,
>
> After the discussion of the proposal to amend Spark committer guidelines,
> it appears folks are generally in agreement on policy clarifications. (See
>
+1
Thanks
Shivaram
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 11:56 PM Wenchen Fan wrote:
>
> +1, thanks for driving it, Holden!
>
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 10:24 AM Holden Karau wrote:
>>
>> +1 from myself :)
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 2:53 PM Jungtaek Lim
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1 (non-binding, I guess)
>>>
Hi German,
option 1 isn't about "deleting" the old files, as your input directory may
be accessed by multiple queries. Kafka centralizes the maintenance of input
data hence possible to apply retention without problem.
option 1 is more about "hiding" the old files being read, so that end users